Confirmed Signing with Link: [STL] F Dylan Holloway (2 years, $2.290457M AAV) and D Philip Broberg (2 years, $4.580917M AAV) sign offer sheets with the Blues (not matched)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Xerloris

reckless optimism
Jun 9, 2015
7,662
8,272
St.Louis
He doesn't have a cap hit like the others, his percentage is the lowest, by several points in every instance. It's disingenuous to compare them when they were signed in different eras, the only way you can compare them is by cap hit percentages, and Pettersson's is far and away the lowest.

Hate to break it to you but 13% is not far and way from 15%
 

Rowlet

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 13, 2018
4,465
5,255
Hate to break it to you but 13% is not far and way from 15%

The difference between 13% and 15/16% is nearly 3 million dollars per year in the case of McDavid, nearly 2 million per year for the others, if their deals were signed today.

11.4 per for EP, 13.2 for the others, 14.1 for McDavid
 
  • Like
Reactions: andora

BlueSeal

Believe In The Note
Dec 1, 2013
7,626
6,862
Out West
The difference between 13% and 15/16% is nearly 3 million dollars per year in the case of McDavid, nearly 2 million per year for the others, if their deals were signed today.

11.4 per for EP, 13.2 for the others, 14.1 for McDavid
It's not in money, it's in scale.
 

Rowlet

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 13, 2018
4,465
5,255
It's not in money, it's in scale.

13% is a 15% drop from 15%.

Does Pettersson deserve 85% as much as any of those other guys in their contract years? I'd find it hard to come up with that many reasons why not, a lot of people are going to be very surprised at what 100pt 25 year old C's sign for going forward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: andora

bringbacktheskate604

Registered User
Jul 20, 2022
1,472
1,664
Getting paid like McDavid, Matthews, and MacKinnon. He is in fact not a McDavid, Matthews, or MacKinnon.

At 10 million, he'd be fine. At 10.5, he'd be fair value. At 11.6, overpaid.
Well he makes far less than two of them and #97 will be far ahead pretty soon.


He's also put up similar points to AM and Nate before this season had similar production, especially if you go by age.

But again, shouldn't this contract be judged once it starts?
 

HenrikW

Registered User
Feb 21, 2018
669
528
As an Oiler fan, seeing all this go down is just thoroughly disappointing. Once more, Oilers management has every opportunity to succeed but end up cucking themselves. Their young players didn't ask for much really. To low ball them and not sign them when they should is just so disappointing. Mismanaging youth seems like Oilers bread and butter
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andrei79

GOilers88

#FreeMoustacheRides
Dec 24, 2016
15,185
22,718
All of this talk of attaching picks to players like Ceci and Kulak, just to keep Bro and Holly is alarming. If all they have to attach is a 2026 2nd and 2025 & 26 3rds, then they are going to need to add for a team to accept Ceci or Kulak.

It must be tough for Oilers fans to accept that their FO is this inept at managing a roster.

The 4M to Arvidsson (31 y/o) was plenty to extend both Bro and Holly.

The other 3M to J. Skinner (32 y/o) could have been better spent.

Also, we've all been reading since Tuesday how much Oilers fans really don't like either of Broberg or Holloway, so why would they want to keep either?
Plenty of Oiler fans like both players, and regardless of that why would a fans like or dislike of players have any bearing on what the organization does and does not do?
 

TheBeastCoast

Registered User
Mar 23, 2011
32,555
33,789
Dartmouth,NS
Signing Skinner was a getting high on your own supply signing. Like in a vacuum 3 million for Skinner seems like a good deal...but go beneath the base layer and it makes no sense. First of all, it was purely a luxury signing, didn't fill a need at all and you are bringing in the biggest loser in the entire league to boot.....then at the same time you aren't able to take care of your young homegrown players looking for contracts. Arvidsson still a really good signing...if he can stay healthy!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andrei79 and Rubi

nturn06

Registered User
Nov 9, 2017
3,907
3,298
Oilers do not have the cap room to match.they are at the cap already
In the offseason a team can exceed the cap by 10%, and by matching both they will be under that. Even if they match they have about a month and half to either trade away someone or get a player or two to get a Kucherov type "injury".
 

yianik

Registered User
Jun 30, 2009
11,149
6,715
I don't see how Oilers turn the other cheek and walk away from 2 young players with some apparent upside for a 2nd and 3rd. The compensation is garbage. But I guess they need to look at the cost of creating Cap space as well.
 

archangel2

Registered User
May 19, 2019
2,804
1,740
Oilers are screwed

I don't see how Oilers turn the other cheek and walk away from 2 young players with some apparent upside for a 2nd and 3rd. The compensation is garbage. But I guess they need to look at the cost of creating Cap space as well.
How can the afford them?
 

bucks_oil

Registered User
Aug 25, 2005
8,763
5,147
Assuming Kane is on LTIR until the playoffs seems unlikely given his injury. I think in that scenario they need to trade him. And attach assets to do so.
They aren’t attaching assets to trade Kane. He’s been a model citizen in Edmonton and it was reported just last week that there was a trade market for him.
 

bucks_oil

Registered User
Aug 25, 2005
8,763
5,147
If you got Doug Armstrong interested, these guys have something going for them. Army finds diamonds in the rough with sorcery and magic boards. He'll occasionally take a risk just for the hell of it, but this one seems very calculated. I'm curious what he sees that others don't.

Their upward potential is of much less value to Edmonton if their cap hit is out of whack…. That’s the point. They have value to a contender when as value contracts, not if they have inflated contracts.

StLouis has the luxury of waiting and paying in advance for that future value… that’s the acquisition cost. Edmonton has to dismantle the team to keep them… very different value proposition

They may well exceed $7M in cap value this year, but it still has a real additional cost to Edmonton because of how it negatively impacts the rest of the roster.
 

bucks_oil

Registered User
Aug 25, 2005
8,763
5,147
Signing Skinner was a getting high on your own supply signing. Like in a vacuum 3 million for Skinner seems like a good deal...but go beneath the base layer and it makes no sense. First of all, it was purely a luxury signing, didn't fill a need at all and you are bringing in the biggest loser in the entire league to boot.....then at the same time you aren't able to take care of your young homegrown players looking for contracts. Arvidsson still a really good signing...if he can stay healthy!

Broberg was asking for $1.8, Holloway for 1.2… Friedman reported that… these numbers came from out of the blue(s).

Nobody was expecting they’d shown enough for this to be a real threat. To that extent, t’s very well played by Armstrong… you can’t really blame Jackson or Skinner for this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WetcoastOrca
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad