itwasaforwardpass
I'll be the hyena
- Mar 4, 2017
- 5,358
- 5,209
Waivers in meaning another team grabs him
Like I said. He's playing like garbage and he has two years at 3.3 million on his contract. No one is doing the Stars a favor for free.
Waivers in meaning another team grabs him
Like I said. He's playing like garbage and he has two years at 3.3 million on his contract. No one is doing the Stars a favor for free.
I think a team would
Unfortunately the only one the Oilers would want is Otter
I bet Dallas gets some value here. He is a bit off this year but he did backstop Dallas to a cup finals. He can be streaky. When he is on he is great.Like I said. He's playing like garbage and he has two years at 3.3 million on his contract. No one is doing the Stars a favor for free.
This is the exact situation he said he was hoping for . “We want otter to come in and force us to make some tough decisions” I believe is what nill said . Time to make some tough decisions Jim .Jim Nill had to have seen this coming when he signed Holtby in the first place.
It'll be interesting to see how he digs his team out of this nice little hole he's created for them.
I could see khudobin doing well in Pittsburgh. Why ? I don’t know .As a pens fan I hope Sleepy makes some calls. CDS as a backup ain't helping.
Well let's see what "ready as i can be" means exactly.
Edmonton should for sure be on the phone lines working a deal for Bishop. Just make sure to have insurance for him. Mike Smith could be that insurance.
The only Dallas goalie that would help Edmonton is the one Dallas wouldn't trade. Unless Bishop had a full body repair.Don't give Edmonton goalies.
For Bishop? Nothing. Cap has to even out and there isn't really any way to do that. Bishop is such a gamble.This is possibly something that could convince Bishop to waive his MNTC/NMC clauses. What does Edmonton have to offer?
Sure and Dallas would like McDavid. But back to reality here.Unfortunately the only one the Oilers would want is Otter
Why would Dallas take the same cap back as a cap dump for the sake of just moving bishop? I get he is a gamble but moving him for a cap dump is a bit over the top.For Bishop? Nothing. Cap has to even out and there isn't really any way to do that. Bishop is such a gamble.
They wouldn't. But Edmonton is maxed out, so for Edmonton to be in on Bishop, money would need to be going out. Bishop is a gamble because he is hurt all the time. Even before his most recent injury and time off. I hope he is better now, but until we know for sure, he's a few moments away from being on the shelf again. Plus we already have a goalie that is hurt alot (although Bishop's track record is significantly better). Honestly, Dallas' best option is running with Oettinger and Bishop if it doesn't put them over the cap to do it. The issues there being of course that they need to find someone to take Khudobin and Holtby. Holtby should be movable, I'm not so sure on Khudobin.Why would Dallas take the same cap back as a cap dump for the sake of just moving bishop? I get he is a gamble but moving him for a cap dump is a bit over the top.
Well that’s the only g that is worth more than waiversSure and Dallas would like McDavid. But back to reality here.
Why? Edmonton doesn't need a backup. We need a starter.Colorado or Edmonton would be stupid not to make an offer for Holtby
This is possibly something that could convince Bishop to waive his MNTC/NMC clauses. What does Edmonton have to offer?
Does a team want Bishop Or Khudobin at even 50 off ?