LeafalCrusader
Registered User
The Empress sucks ass. Horrible cartoonish character. Star Trek deserves better.
Wait...Tilly was made first officer?
Ensign Tilly being the first officer would be like if Nog was promoted to first officer of DS9 in season 7 when Colonel Kira went to help the Cardassians, difference is Nog was actually shown to be competent.
Damn it, I really liked Empress Philippa. Perfect combination of a true asshole and a badass.
I think that is when he was a cadet still, funny conversation.What's funny is Nog talks with O'Brien about the CoC and how he be able to command the defiant. O'Brien goes onto explain that while he might he might be able to in certain circumstances, those circumstances involve literally everyone else being dead on the bridge.
What's funny is Nog talks with O'Brien about the CoC and how he be able to command the defiant. O'Brien goes onto explain that while he might he might be able to in certain circumstances, those circumstances involve literally everyone else being dead on the bridge.
The Empress sucks ass. Horrible cartoonish character. Star Trek deserves better.
I liked her last year, but it was clear this year that they were lost on her, instead they made her into a insult comic that looked like she was suffering from near fatal constipation. They pretty much could have run a laugh track whenever she flung an insult.
She had become a nothing burger in the end, and that episode was frankly about putting a bullet into a character that they had lost momentum on.
Even the wake scene at the end felt like a combination of a waste of time, and a victory lap by the writers over finding a clever way to get rid of a character that could have stolen time from Michael.
Did anyone find it disturbing that the Discovery crew actually celebrated Georgiou's departure?
As the Terran Empress she killed or ordered the deaths of thousands of Terrans including the previous Emperor / Empress.
She murdered, enslaved and occasionally ate millions of non-Terrans across the Terran Empire.
She was worse than, Khan, Mao, Stalin and Hitler.
And yet here is the Discovery crew toasting her and calling her a "badass" as if she was a cool person to be admired instead of a monster.
Even worse, Carl aka the Guardian of Forever seemed to be okay with all the blood on her hands because of her sudden change of heart in her remaining days and decided to spare her life.
It's almost like the writers are trying to tell us that dictators and dictatorships are cool and the preferred method of governance.
How do the writers think that a character that committed genocide and ate tons of sentient species is redeemable?
Blizzard did the same trash story line with Kerrigan in SC2. Reaped the galaxy and killed tens of millions (If not far more), but no, she's a misunderstood person who needs saving.
Oh yeah, she also betrayed and then murdered Raynor's best friend, along with countless others she manipulated in her grand scheme.
Burnham presumably trying to redeem herself with evil Georgiou for betraying the real Georgiou and getting her killed--and it just doesn't make nearly the sense that the writers seem to think that it does. Maybe it would've if evil Georgiou had softened up and grown close to Burnham, but that didn't happen until the final episode.
Something to think about: would the writers have done this if she were a he? If Georgiou were a brutally honest, vindictive and megalomaniac man (hmm), would the writers have made him into a sympathetic character who went through a redemption arc and whose loss was mourned? No, he'd be branded a monster, made the villain and defeated like Lorca was.
Georgiou's past crimes and recent demeanor were excused because she was a strong female character, IMO. That's seemingly more important than any of her awful traits. It's the same with Burnham. Each time that she stands up to authority and does her own thing, we're supposed to admire what a strong, independent woman she is. There's nothing admirable about either character, though. Both are irritating and full of themselves and have no business being on Starfleet ships (unless in the brig), yet the writers seem to have no sense of that or how to write a strong and independent female character without making her a rude rogue.
Wow, that's inexcusable. If Kerrigan really did all of that, I don't blame Tonya Harding one bit for trying to break her leg.
I think there was something interesting here if they go in a different direction. Have Burnham try to redeem herself by "saving" mirror Georgiou and constantly attempting to get close to her while looking for foregiveness for her actions. But in the end make it that mirror Georgiou plays her guilt like a fiddle and screws Burnham over to get something that she wants, with one last twist of the knife before her departure in the form of chastising Burnham for being dumb enough to think that she could get absolution for her sins through attempting to save a) a person who doesn't want that kind of saving, and b) someone who isn't even the same person as the one who was actually wronged (ie the prime Georgiou) and thus is in no position to offer that absolution even if she wanted to give it.
There. You've avoided turning Georgiou into a lazy fanfiction writer's "I can change the villain into a sympathetic character by remaking them in a distorted image" plot device and you've provided something approximating an actual growth opportunity for Burnham which would serve to humanize her rather than reaffirming her perfect-being-walking-mary-sue status.
"Blessing people she comes into contact with" is pretty accurate. Unlike previous Star Trek shows which were very character driven, almost every character story in Discovery has revolved around how the character interacts with the lead.Yeah, I didn't think of your alternative, but it did seem to me that the premise had some potential that the writers didn't explore. I still don't like the idea of a Starfleet officer mutinying against her Captain and getting her killed, but the show could've used and turned that into a better storyline. As you suggested, a tragic outcome probably would've been more realistic.
What we got is Burnham turning evil Georgiou into a better person just as she made Spock into the person that he would become. I believe that she also convinced Pike to not dwell on his fate, so we also have her to thank for the spinoff series and what Pike does in it. Basically, Burnham is just going around the universe(s) and time periods blessing people who come into contact with her as if she's the Pope.
I haven't watched the latest episode, I was waiting to see the reactions to it. From what I am reading, Georgiou dies and then the entire crew of Discovery ends up praising her. Are you effing kidding me?!? This is so stupid. She treated them all like $hit.
Remember the contrived fight scene in the corridor between the two Terran officers, black female and white male?
Before the fight started did anyone watching the show not know who the winner of the fight would be?
It's a shame everything went this way too. I like Michelle Yeoh a lot. She deserved better than to play a legitimately tragic character for 20 minutes followed by the world's laziest cardboard cutout "draco in leather pants" redemption-path villain for the next 2 seasons.
How do the writers think that a character that committed genocide and ate tons of sentient species is redeemable?