They're more valuable if you have the whole set.Elias Pettersson for the Canucks.... don't they have one of those?
I'll let you know when we pick him, but I love him already.Who do we like in this slot?
I thought you meant just guys we drafted, and Perunovich has not proven anything yet.Krug has looked good, Perunovich was a good pick. Mike Weaver was fun
My knowledge is very limited at this point if the draft if I’m honest. If they’re BPA I’m all for itLindgren, Buchinger?
At this point, I’m not even sure what a BPA would look like.My knowledge is very limited at this point if the draft if I’m honest. If they’re BPA I’m all for it
I was unclear, that's fair. My point was more that we've been willing to go after those guys and develop them. Certainly Perunovich hasn't proven anything at the NHL level, but it looks like we expect him to have a role next year and he's thought of as a pretty solid prospect.I thought you meant just guys we drafted, and Perunovich has not proven anything yet.
95. Michael Buchinger — LHD, Guelph Storm, six-feet
Buchinger is a smooth-skating, smooth-passing two-way defenceman who adeptly breaks pucks out with a consistent first pass on outlets but also loves to jump into the rush to create offence with his feet as a trailer. He’s also got a harder shot than his six goals this season suggest. Defensively, he’s got a good stick that he leads with to disrupt carriers, and a physical edge that he’s comfortable falling back on as a backup to close out. He surprised scouts with his vision inside the offensive zone and overall defensive polish as a rookie. I’m not settled on an NHL projection, but he’s the kind of player who feels like he’ll be solid AHL depth at minimum.