The state of the Habs Rebuild - The Next step

What note you give to Kent Hughes' Rebuild? ?

  • A

    Votes: 209 49.8%
  • B

    Votes: 154 36.7%
  • C

    Votes: 43 10.2%
  • D

    Votes: 5 1.2%
  • E

    Votes: 2 0.5%
  • F

    Votes: 11 2.6%

  • Total voters
    420

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
78,637
50,047
empty or heavily biased criticism is useless regardless of rebuild status... There's a big difference between critique and mindless emotional ranting.

That's apparently hard for some to understand no matter how many times their hot takes prove baseless or refuted over time... As the Slaf thread last season "should" have taught some.
The reality is that some players won’t pan out. It’s unfortunate but true.

Dach was pretty blue chip before his injury but now has struggled to come back. And… maybe he never will. I don’t think that’s the case but it’s possible. Likewise Newhook looked good last year but had injury problems.

This year the whole club is off. I’d attribute it to the system but who knows? It doesn’t change the big picture though. The team is still well positioned for the future. We may have some holes we didn’t expect- 2nd line center for example - but our Laval players are killing it, Demidov, Hage and RB are on the way… still a great place to be.

We’re not even a quarter into the season yet. Let’s see where it goes. Still lots of time for guys like Dach and Newhook to find their game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: themilosh

teamfirst

Registered User
Oct 28, 2016
3,884
2,553
empty or heavily biased criticism is useless regardless of rebuild status... There's a big difference between critique and mindless emotional ranting.

That's apparently hard for some to understand no matter how many times their hot takes prove baseless or refuted over time... As the Slaf thread last season "should" have taught some.

That's the thing tho with opinions no matter how much YOU think that they're baseless or that you refuted them doesn't mean that you're right......it still just your opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1909

LaP

Registered User
Jun 27, 2012
26,224
20,506
Quebec City, Canada
That's the thing tho with opinions no matter how much YOU think that they're baseless or that you refuted them doesn't mean that you're right......it still just your opinion.
I'm lost. So basically if you successfully refute an "opinion" with facts that "opinion" might still be right? Are you a flat earth believer?

An opinion is saying i dislike The Tree of Life or i like Avengers: Endgame. Or i prefer the color blue. Those are opinions. They usually can't be refuted because well they are opinions.

It's okay to not like Slaf as a player. But he is a good prospect. There's only 66 players in NHL history who did 50+ points as a 19 years old and easily half of them became very good players and that's not an opinion that's quantifiable.
 

HuGo Sham

MR. CLEAN-up ©Runner77
Apr 7, 2010
28,638
20,973
Montreal
I'm lost. So basically if you successfully refute an "opinion" with facts that "opinion" might still be right? Are you a flat earth believer?

An opinion is saying i dislike The Tree of Life or i like Avengers: Endgame. Or i prefer the color blue. Those are opinions. They usually can't be refuted because well they are opinions.

It's okay to not like Slaf as a player. But he is a good prospect. There's only 66 players in NHL history who did 50+ points as a 19 years old and easily half of them became very good players and that's not an opinion that's quantifiable.
random Terrence Malick shoutout
 
  • Like
Reactions: Miller Time

habamillions

Registered User
Jul 9, 2009
4,687
1,494
Ottawa
I give it a B+. He was put in a really tough spot with terrible contracts like gally,andy and armia. Like his drafting for the most part especially last year. Only thing i havent liked is the picks of reinbacher and mesar. Hope they work out in the future but right now looks like a miss, but still early in there careers
 

themilosh

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2015
3,192
2,682
Oakville, ON
I give it a B+. He was put in a really tough spot with terrible contracts like gally,andy and armia. Like his drafting for the most part especially last year. Only thing i havent liked is the picks of reinbacher and mesar. Hope they work out in the future but right now looks like a miss, but still early in there careers
Imo the only big mistake Hugo made was drafting Mesar, what a complete whiff that was.. lol

While i (too) wanted Michkov i completely understood (and accepted) the Reinbacher selection, and am prepared to give him another 2 years (this year and next) to establish himself.. it makes sense to acquire a RHD.. a badly needed position for every NHL team: scarcity = value.

I'd love to use CC acquire a legit 2RD.. i know this is unpopular, but im simply not a fan of his game.. it's clear hugo knew if they selected Michkov then CC had to go, you cannot have two small wingers in your top 6.
 

HuGo Sham

MR. CLEAN-up ©Runner77
Apr 7, 2010
28,638
20,973
Montreal
I actually like the tree of life but i watched it while high so that probably helped. I said dislike because i did not want to get involved in a discussion with an anti-tree of lifer those guys are passionate to a religious level about their disdain for the movie.
it's a great film ...the haters ..dont @ me
 
  • Like
Reactions: Miller Time

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
78,637
50,047
I'm lost. So basically if you successfully refute an "opinion" with facts that "opinion" might still be right? Are you a flat earth believer?

An opinion is saying i dislike The Tree of Life or i like Avengers: Endgame. Or i prefer the color blue. Those are opinions. They usually can't be refuted because well they are opinions.

It's okay to not like Slaf as a player. But he is a good prospect. There's only 66 players in NHL history who did 50+ points as a 19 years old and easily half of them became very good players and that's not an opinion that's quantifiable.
Similarly, it’s fine to argue that you don’t want a rebuild. But when you say that rebuilds don’t work, it’s just factually wrong.

Rebuilding isn’t a guarantee- but nothing is. The vast majority of cup winners are rebuilds. That doesn’t mean that if you rebuild you’ll win a cup though.
 
Last edited:

teamfirst

Registered User
Oct 28, 2016
3,884
2,553
I'm lost. So basically if you successfully refute an "opinion" with facts that "opinion" might still be right? Are you a flat earth believer?

An opinion is saying i dislike The Tree of Life or i like Avengers: Endgame. Or i prefer the color blue. Those are opinions. They usually can't be refuted because well they are opinions.

It's okay to not like Slaf as a player. But he is a good prospect. There's only 66 players in NHL history who did 50+ points as a 19 years old and easily half of them became very good players and that's not an opinion that's quantifiable.

Was not talking about Slaf, where did you take that, i,m one of the few around here who wanted Hugo to draft him 1st overall and still think he will be a great player, reading or comprehension problem maybe
 

Miller Time

Registered User
Sep 16, 2004
24,315
17,191
That's the thing tho with opinions no matter how much YOU think that they're baseless or that you refuted them doesn't mean that you're right......it still just your opinion.

Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
- Jeff Lebowski
 
  • Haha
Reactions: LaP

HuGort

Registered User
Jun 15, 2012
21,662
10,647
Nova Scotia
Barron hasn't even played 100 games... nothing is stalled there. Injuries have sucked, no question about it. Newhook I don't see as a core player. He's a guy who provides depth scoring.

Dach's a different story. He looked awesome and set up to be our number 2 (maybe even number one) but injuries have totally disrupted things. This is a make or break in terms of relying on him for that role and we're using him on the wing. It sucks but 2nd line center could well be an open question by the time this year's over. Still early, still lots of time for Dach to find his game but...
I've seen Dach mail it in at times. Could be not fully over injuries I don't know. If he doesn't make it as #2 center going to push rebuild back.

Newhook should be better. He had good college career and has speed and hands. Barron has good raw skills but lacks decision making. Tries to do too much at times and gets into trouble.

Matheson played his best game this season against Colombus. He probably should been traded last deadline or in summer coming off career year. Likely lost value since. Likewise Anderson couple years back. Regardless of return, I just want the 5 million caphit back. Caproom could be tight next summer if Hughes fixes his defense. Habs need size yes, but tough fourth liner shouldn't be hard to replace him with.
 

ReHabs

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2022
8,137
12,494
Imo the only big mistake Hugo made was drafting Mesar, what a complete whiff that was.. lol
He's made other mistakes. I think betting on a skill player with a first round pick is generally fine tbh.
While i (too) wanted Michkov i completely understood (and accepted) the Reinbacher selection, and am prepared to give him another 2 years (this year and next) to establish himself.. it makes sense to acquire a RHD.. a badly needed position for every NHL team: scarcity = value.
Fully agree. I was sanguine about the Reinbacher pick because it seemed the organization was completely convinced of it.
I'd love to use CC acquire a legit 2RD.. i know this is unpopular, but im simply not a fan of his game.. it's clear hugo knew if they selected Michkov then CC had to go, you cannot have two small wingers in your top 6.
They bet on the bird in hand (CC + Reinbacher) over the one in bush (MM). It makes sense from a team building POV even if it is extremely frustrating to think about Michkov getting better and better. He's already outproducing Cooley and Slafkovsky ffs.
 

Bouboumaster

Registered User
Jul 4, 2014
10,789
9,276
Still can't believe we're still looking for a motherf***ing center after all those years

At least we already have Suzuki, so truly we're looking for a 1B/2 Center, but still, wtf
 
  • Like
Reactions: ReHabs

Ad

Upcoming events

  • HV 71 @ Lulea Hockey
    HV 71 @ Lulea Hockey
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $85.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Croatia vs Portugal
    Croatia vs Portugal
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $50,050.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Poland vs Scotland
    Poland vs Scotland
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Serbia vs Denmark
    Serbia vs Denmark
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad