Exactly, our system is built for lunch pail hockey but we continually draft for high skill players who don't score/play that way. There is some disconnect somewhere in the org.
It's like they got hoodwinked by those early pack of Wolves teams but those teams had completely different roster configurations and completely different player types as the key drivers.
I don't think the lunch pail hockey was the plan from the beginning - the org knows what they have and what they are capable of.
But when a team is struggling with execution (for an extended period), coaching to a simple system makes sense.
Our players have the skill to be able to adapt or shift in how they play - I don't think anyone is asking KC, Ehlers or Scheif to play power forward roles, but they are asking them to do pretty basic hockey that might include going to the net or work to the open ice for better opportunities.
How may rebounds did Fleury leave laying around all night that our guys had no desire jump on - that takes a lot more work and a desire to go to the hard areas of the ice - there is no reason why our skill can't do that. The problem is, they don't appear to want to.
When you are playing sloppy hockey and struggling to even complete a pass, you need to reset and that usually begins with fundamentals - and your team needs to be willing to shift to that sort of game until they sort things out. I do not believe for a minute, that they are not capable of doing that. It looks more like they either don't want to or are struggling with the idea of keeping it simple.
Greasy goals count too - and Fleury left a ton of opportunity for this team to score a bunch of them last night. Is our core too elite for that task or are they not interested in getting to the hard areas of the ice. We are a perimeter team at this point - 5v5 and on the PP. That is the basic issue right now.