Post-Game Talk: Slip sliding away Jets lose 1-0

Status
Not open for further replies.

Royale With Cheese

----
Sponsor
Nov 24, 2006
8,462
15,718
Four point game against a key division rival, and a game at home.

No excuse for that lazy first period.

Slip sliding away is right. Without Helle, this game is 4-0.

I miss my 17/18 Jets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macmaroon and hn777

potroaster

Registered User
Jul 1, 2012
259
81
That was the most boring hockey I have seen in years. Uninspired. 6 games at home. All defeats. Even Wheeler said it, It takes a period to get back to business at home. Ouch!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: hn777

BoneDocUK

Recovering hockey fandoc
Oct 1, 2015
6,959
14,892
Andrew Copp for Captain and future Jets head coach.
That is one smart, and honest, hockey guy.
So refreshing to hear him speak.

Yeah he's a great interview.

He's one player they couldn't really afford to scrimp on. Brings a lot of value, despite the occasional stone hands.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hn777

LowLefty

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Dec 29, 2016
7,718
14,078
Since when is zone time the name of the game?

With our O talent, it should be an important stat -
Off night tonight for most of them - couldn't generate much despite the fact that they had Ozone minutes to support more scoring.
This is one problem I thought we would not have - scoring goals when in the zone.
There's more to it than that and I don't want to over simplify - but the major challenge I have seen, and expected, was zone exits.
A more important stat might be a breakdown of which lines made up that zone time -
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mortimer Snerd

surixon

Registered User
Jul 12, 2003
50,890
75,029
Winnipeg
With our O talent, it should be an important stat -
Off night tonight for most of them - couldn't generate much despite the fact that they had Ozone minutes to support more scoring.
This is one problem I thought we would not have - scoring goals when in the zone.
There's more to it than that and I don't want to over simplify - but the major challenge I have seen, and expected, was zone exits.
A more important stat might be a breakdown of which lines made up that zone time -

I think the biggest issue is that all too often the zone time was used to just generate a point shot. As our shot charts show a good many came from the point.

20192020-20703-5v5.png


Imo that isn't the best strategy for good defensive team like the Preds that did a good job blocking shots, and cleaning up loose pucks in front.

Our defense had half our shots on target tonight which isn't optimum.

The Lowry line had one shot on target tonight and that was Copp's shorthanded attempt. A line can't get those types of minutes and generate nothing.

Scheifele and Connor only one shot each, the fourth line with a goose egg on the shot column as well.

SImply put our we need the forwards to get into shooting positions and shoot. Having the offense come from the defense isn't a long term recipe for success.
 

LowLefty

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Dec 29, 2016
7,718
14,078
I think the biggest issue is that all too often the zone time was used to just generate a point shot. As our shot charts show a good many came from the point.

20192020-20703-5v5.png


Imo that isn't the best strategy for good defensive team like the Preds that did a good job blocking shots, and cleaning up loose pucks in front.

Our defense had half our shots on target tonight which isn't optimum.

The Lowry line had one shot on target tonight and that was Copp's shorthanded attempt. A line can't get those types of minutes and generate nothing.

Scheifele and Connor only one shot each, the fourth line with a goose egg on the shot column as well.

SImply put our we need the forwards to get into shooting positions and shoot. Having the offense come from the defense isn't a long term recipe for success.

Thanks for posting this - the eye test also supports the point shots.
Is that planned or are we simply not getting into position for more dangerous shots?
I don't think it's just today's game either - our point guys are getting lots of looks - maybe the opposition is giving us that lane knowing we don't have a lot of cannons back there and we are not that strong in front of the net. There have been a couple of deflections lately but we rarely see anything off the rebound.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlaskaJet

surixon

Registered User
Jul 12, 2003
50,890
75,029
Winnipeg
Thanks for posting this - the eye test also supports the point shots.
Is that planned or are we simply not getting into position for more dangerous shots?
I don't think it's just today's game either - our point guys are getting lots of looks - maybe the opposition is giving us that lane knowing we don't have a lot of cannons back there and we are not that strong in front of the net. There have been a couple of deflections lately but we rarely see anything off the rebound.

Maurice has stated in an interview that he wants a lot of offense from the points so one of the chief offensive strategies is the point shot. Its substantiated by Copp's interview today where he talks about there being more opportunities where they should have gotten the puck back to the points.

The one draw back from this strategy is that we often don't have enough traffic in front of the net to maximize the chances of a tip in or a screened shot getting through.

We need to augment the point shot strategy with opening up plays down low and into the slot. More movement and rotations are needed by our forwards to get open in the slot. The second and third line don't do near a good enough job of this. I think switching Connor and Ehlers helps as it spreads out our good and smart slot shooter to two lines.

Our third line needs some speed so maybe move Roslovic down to help that line gain more controlled entries.

Get Perrault with Wheeler Connor
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jimby and LowLefty

johnnyonthspot

Registered User
Apr 1, 2012
2,825
3,975
Yeah, we should have taken Matthews. CHEVY, YOU IDIOT, WHY DIDN'T YOU TAKE MATTHEWS? Oh yeah, he was already taken. :( :sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm:

Seriously, why are you comparing him to Matthews? What does that have to do with Laine? Are you a closet Leafs fan?

Goals win games. Assists produce goals. Why do you think players are given points for them?

Easy there Morty,
I hate the Leafs.
I reference him because they were picked 1 and 2 overall with some saying Laine is better. Have Crosby and Ovechkin not been compared to each other?
I think if the Jets are going to keep Laine long term it is because he can score goals not get assists but that is just me.
I am not saying he is a bad player but he is certainly not living up to the goal scoring pace of past years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hn777

johnnyonthspot

Registered User
Apr 1, 2012
2,825
3,975
Read the first couple of pages... “RAWR...FIRE THE COACH!!”. Such an idiotic thing to burp up after every loss only for them to shut their pie hole after a win.

Maybe I should be equally vapid and demand an extension for Maurice after every win.

I was one who posted that based on losing 6 straight at home.
If you look at the standings teams with below .500 home records are out of playoff contention.
The factbis this team has been super inconsistent and it may be the right time for a coaching change.
They havev2 more at home if they lose both I would bet on that move being made.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rkp and Heldig

FonRiesen

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
3,338
6,889
Vancouver Island
I was one who posted that based on losing 6 straight at home.
If you look at the standings teams with below .500 home records are out of playoff contention.
The factbis this team has been super inconsistent and it may be the right time for a coaching change.
They havev2 more at home if they lose both I would bet on that move being made.
What's most damning about this is that at home Mau controls the line matchups. So coaching strategy (at least that slice of it) theoretically plays a bigger role at home than on the road (relative to other factors contributing to wins). I don't know the size of this factor, but whatever they're doing isn't helping, and we need every tiny advantage we can get.
 

Farmboy Patty

Senior Hockey Analyst
Nov 2, 2017
1,757
2,878
I would say his lack of goals comes from the way PoMo wants him to play. While our coach has him playing a more rounded game. He has killed the kids goal scoring.
This. It was noticeable many times yesterday that Laine put's way more emphasis on defense than his linemates, and he broke at least 2 dangerous plays with his backchecking. He is doing it to stay on the top line, and having so much focus on it will inevitably lead to less goals scored by him. Defense should never be a top priority for a sniper of his pedigree.
 

Farmboy Patty

Senior Hockey Analyst
Nov 2, 2017
1,757
2,878
Thanks for posting this - the eye test also supports the point shots.
Is that planned or are we simply not getting into position for more dangerous shots?
I don't think it's just today's game either - our point guys are getting lots of looks - maybe the opposition is giving us that lane knowing we don't have a lot of cannons back there and we are not that strong in front of the net. There have been a couple of deflections lately but we rarely see anything off the rebound.
It seems to be a coaching strategy that is built around low risk hockey, where the objective is to avoid any risky plays across the ice that could cause a turnover and expose our weak D. The F3 is way too high to give proper support down low, but instead we have 3 players backing up once we lose possession.

Here is a typical play:
1. Clear the red line, dump puck in
2. 1 or 2 forwards try to retrieve it
3. Battle along the boards or cycle until the puck is played back to the point
4. D-man now takes a harmless unscreened shot with little chance of going in, since our forwards are outmanned in the crease with the F3 giving support to the D.
5. Retreat
 

PhilJets

Winnipeg is Good
Jun 24, 2012
10,473
8,319
Somewhere nice
Maurice has stated in an interview that he wants a lot of offense from the points so one of the chief offensive strategies is the point shot.

Get Perrault with Wheeler Connor


Is that the equivalent of asking the Golden States Warriors to play post up offense?

I know Jets are not as vaunted offensively but i can't think of a better example right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Howard Chuck

PaulPooley

Registered User
Nov 18, 2018
2,808
3,870
Laine has broken up more 2 on 1s than scored in the last few games so he’s earning his money that way. First he was a sniper, then a playmaker, now he seems to be a defensive forward. Weird.
Patrik “Zelig” Laine
 

Farmboy Patty

Senior Hockey Analyst
Nov 2, 2017
1,757
2,878
Is that the equivalent of asking the Golden States Warriors to play post up offense?

I know Jets are not as vaunted offensively but i can't think of a better example right now.
Whatever it is, it’s stifling our offensive output when we have our forwards either playing along the boards or carrying our defenders, and our defensemen shooting from the periphery.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PhilJets

BoneDocUK

Recovering hockey fandoc
Oct 1, 2015
6,959
14,892
Whatever it is, it’s stifling our offensive output when we have our forwards either playing along the boards or carrying our defenders, and our defensemen shooting from the periphery.

It isn’t coaching/playing to win so much as playing not to lose. Makes some sense for a team like MIN that is defensively sound-ish with limited offence to play this way, but for a team like the Jets, with high-powered offence and thin D it means that we’re stuck playing from behind a lot while at the same time struggling through a system geared to team weakness, not strength.

Watching KC and 55 waft around the ozone while Laine plays 3rd D is maddening. And for what? We still give up odd-man rushes and cross/lead passes aplenty, while blowing our own simple passes, dumping and not quite chasing and playing negative hockey a fair bit of the tine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad