Confirmed Trade: [SJS/DET] Jake Walman and 2024 2nd round pick for future considerations

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
85,668
86,257
Redmond, WA


Pagnotta, so probably not right, but could be


I am going to absolutely cry laughing if they traded a 2nd to clear out Walman's deal just to then trade assets for Gibson. Holy cow I'd piss myself laughing.

I've been pretty vocal on here about how I think Gibson is awful and is just riding a decade old reputation. But to see the GM that many consider one of the top GMs in hockey falling for that decade old reputation? That would be hilarious.

The dude is f'in awful at this point:

23-24: -9.6 GSAx in 46 games
22-23: -11.5 GSAx in 53 games
21-22: -14.3 GSAx in 56 games
20-21: -7.4 GSAx in 35 games
19-20: -18.0 GSAx in 52 games

He's probably the worst regular starting goalie statistically over the last 5 years.
 

Roshi

Registered User
Feb 7, 2013
2,079
2,099
Finland
another idea could be that the future considerations is one unhappy Goodrow @50%, but they’ll have to wait until a retention slot opens up…! Isnt he an Yzerman guy?

Doesnt explain why they wouldnt just wait for that though, so unlikely :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: AirGut

Tatar Shots

Registered User
Feb 2, 2014
5,862
1,931
I can't think of any future consideration that wouldn't have made sense to just happen now besides an agreement to claim a player Detroit places on waivers after signing someone in free agency. I think it is more likely that the relationship here just really soured toward the end of the season.
 

crazychimp

Registered User
Jun 24, 2014
3,266
1,523
Vancouver
Don’t follow the Wings much but Walman from what I’ve seen has been one of those clutch players how does a guy like this just receive “future considerations”? I feel his value is a bit higher than that.
 

Holden Caufield

Registered User
Oct 9, 2020
1,581
2,170
Ontario
I didn’t mind Walman. He was playing too far up the lineup. But he was pretty steady and had decent offensive instincts/abilities.

I don’t think a team in San Jose’s position is going to regret 3M per for 2 years. The 2nd rounder is just icing.
 

The Red Line

Registered User
Oct 11, 2010
8,600
5,083
I am going to absolutely cry laughing if they traded a 2nd to clear out Walman's deal just to then trade assets for Gibson. Holy cow I'd piss myself laughing.

I've been pretty vocal on here about how I think Gibson is awful and is just riding a decade old reputation. But to see the GM that many consider one of the top GMs in hockey falling for that decade old reputation? That would be hilarious.

The dude is f'in awful at this point:

23-24: -9.6 GSAx in 46 games
22-23: -11.5 GSAx in 53 games
21-22: -14.3 GSAx in 56 games
20-21: -7.4 GSAx in 35 games
19-20: -18.0 GSAx in 52 games

He's probably the worst regular starting goalie statistically over the last 5 years.
A media guy saying “I wonder if a team like detroit…” has you criticizing the GM of team for something that hasn’t even happened yet is a reach.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: redbeardtx

DuckDuckGetz

Registered User
Nov 20, 2017
2,742
4,445
I am going to absolutely cry laughing if they traded a 2nd to clear out Walman's deal just to then trade assets for Gibson. Holy cow I'd piss myself laughing.

I've been pretty vocal on here about how I think Gibson is awful and is just riding a decade old reputation. But to see the GM that many consider one of the top GMs in hockey falling for that decade old reputation? That would be hilarious.

The dude is f'in awful at this point:

23-24: -9.6 GSAx in 46 games
22-23: -11.5 GSAx in 53 games
21-22: -14.3 GSAx in 56 games
20-21: -7.4 GSAx in 35 games
19-20: -18.0 GSAx in 52 games

He's probably the worst regular starting goalie statistically over the last 5 years.
I mean, he has played behind some of the statistically worst defenses in the last 5 years so it's hardly surprising.

Gibson is a head case but the talent is very much there. He will be somewhere between fine to great on a better team.
 

norrisnick

The best...
Apr 14, 2005
31,223
16,565
Ghost is a better version of Walman that can play both sides. I just don't want to pay him, but for the people saying Walman was a our second best defender, for a little while yes. Then his game fell off a cliff, that did happen it seems a lot of people missed the version of him that wasn't trying from February on. I get that he got nicked, but he missed on a lot of effort plays in March, it appears they have moved on from him as a result.
He plays both sides, but he really can't. He's useless on the left, because it's not advantageous to him offensively and defensively he sucks on either side. I would 1000% prefer Walman for 2 years at $3.whatever over Ghost at whatever the f*** he's signing for this summer.
 

Pavels Dog

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
20,801
16,578
Sweden
I am going to absolutely cry laughing if they traded a 2nd to clear out Walman's deal just to then trade assets for Gibson. Holy cow I'd piss myself laughing.

I've been pretty vocal on here about how I think Gibson is awful and is just riding a decade old reputation. But to see the GM that many consider one of the top GMs in hockey falling for that decade old reputation? That would be hilarious.

The dude is f'in awful at this point:

23-24: -9.6 GSAx in 46 games
22-23: -11.5 GSAx in 53 games
21-22: -14.3 GSAx in 56 games
20-21: -7.4 GSAx in 35 games
19-20: -18.0 GSAx in 52 games

He's probably the worst regular starting goalie statistically over the last 5 years.
Imagine thinking GSAx stats are a reliable measure of how good a goalie is.

I'm wondering who @Petes2424 knows in the Wings org. He was talking about Walman being shipped out since March.
It was a fairly predictable outcome, it's just fact he was traded like a cap dump that is the surprising part.
 

bobbythebrain

Registered User
Jul 30, 2016
14,092
13,926
Yzerman watching Walman do his 15th griddy.....
0039f261-7e07-4b0a-ab08-cb8b7eb01ba3-YzermanCover.jpg
 

Kaners PPGs

Registered User
Jun 2, 2012
2,267
1,153
Chicagoland (Tinley Park)
I am going to absolutely cry laughing if they traded a 2nd to clear out Walman's deal just to then trade assets for Gibson. Holy cow I'd piss myself laughing.

I've been pretty vocal on here about how I think Gibson is awful and is just riding a decade old reputation. But to see the GM that many consider one of the top GMs in hockey falling for that decade old reputation? That would be hilarious.

The dude is f'in awful at this point:

23-24: -9.6 GSAx in 46 games
22-23: -11.5 GSAx in 53 games
21-22: -14.3 GSAx in 56 games
20-21: -7.4 GSAx in 35 games
19-20: -18.0 GSAx in 52 games

He's probably the worst regular starting goalie statistically over the last 5 years.

I agree 100%. Gibson hasn't been good for 5 seasons. All those negative GSAA stats mean he was worse than average. And the stat takes into account the bad defense in front of him. Dostal has been better than Gibson the last two seasons. Then you hear talk of Verbeek not wanting to retain and having a high price on Gibson. What? Even if Anaheim retains the maximum, Gibson is not returning much. I know Duck fans will defend him but the stats don't lie.

Imagine thinking GSAx stats are a reliable measure of how good a goalie is.


It was a fairly predictable outcome, it's just fact he was traded like a cap dump that is the surprising part.
What stat do you prefer for goalies?
 

Shaman464

No u
May 1, 2009
10,474
4,593
Boston, MA
Imagine thinking GSAx stats are a reliable measure of how good a goalie is.


It was a fairly predictable outcome, it's just fact he was traded like a cap dump that is the surprising part.
How about how the 23 year old goalie that he split duties with putting up a 0.902 sv% compared to Gibsons 0.888. Gibson is worse than a goalie barely breaking into the league.
 

Pavels Dog

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
20,801
16,578
Sweden
What stat do you prefer for goalies?
Sv% is right there. Dig into advanced stats if you want to but it's extremely naive (and demonstrably false) to think they manage to account for extremes or have enough data points (at least the public models) to take the numbers at face value.

How about how the 23 year old goalie that he split duties with putting up a 0.902 sv% compared to Gibsons 0.888. Gibson is worse than a goalie barely breaking into the league.
I'm sure most GMs would rather trade for Dostal. Is he available?
 

Roomba With a Bauer

Registered User
Sep 11, 2007
4,511
3,135
It was a fairly predictable outcome, it's just fact he was traded like a cap dump that is the surprising part.
The future considerations return paired with the additional second makes me think SJ is going to be retaining salary in a trade, possibly to move out Husso in a Saros trade. There is nothing to indicate that Walman needed to be a cap dump. Without additional trades this is just a really bad, unnecessary, dumb move.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedHawkDown

Shaman464

No u
May 1, 2009
10,474
4,593
Boston, MA
Sv% is right there. Dig into advanced stats if you want to but it's extremely naive (and demonstrably false) to think they manage to account for extremes or have enough data points (at least the public models) to take the numbers at face value.


I'm sure most GMs would rather trade for Dostal. Is he available?
I have a bag of trash that’s available you want it? Just because someone else’s trash is available doesn’t mean you need to acquire it.
 

Pavels Dog

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
20,801
16,578
Sweden
A used diaper is a used diaper. Detroit shouldn’t be in the business of bailing out teams from their shit contracts.
And at 6.4 million a year he’s a sun baked diaper.
Let's wait and see. If a deal comes into fruition and there's no retention involved I would be surprised.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad