MilkofthePoppy
Registered User
- Oct 27, 2022
- 1,102
- 1,918
Random stuff relevant to winning a cup. Oh I don't know like playoff performances? Yeah sure stuff matters. Show me some stuff where Marner got us to rd3. Oh that's right we never made it past rd2 one time.You seem to be factoring in whatever random stuff you want in whatever way you want to get to the conclusion you want.
Nylander doesn't have any hardware anyway, and neither him or Matthews have been better in the playoffs.
Hardware isn't relevant to winning a cup, and Nylander doesn't have any hardware either. Endorsements aren't relevant to winning a cup, and it's no different for Matthews and Nylander. Past playoff production isn't very relevant to winning a future cup, and Marner is the best on the team at that anyway. You don't get paid for team outcomes, and you especially don't get paid less than your teammates for team outcomes they were also there for.Random stuff relevant to winning a cup.
Hardware isn't relevant to winning a cup, and Nylander doesn't have any hardware either. Endorsements aren't relevant to winning a cup, and it's no different for Matthews and Nylander. Past playoff production isn't very relevant to winning a future cup, and Marner is the best on the team at that anyway. You don't get paid for team outcomes, and you especially don't get paid less than your teammates for team outcomes they were also there for.
Winning regular season hardware has nothing to do with winning a cup. At best, it's a player quality indicator, but you're already ignoring better quality indicators.Hardware is absolutely.
Winning regular season hardware has nothing to do with winning a cup. At best, it's a player quality indicator, but you're already ignoring better quality indicators to avoid acknowledging that Marner is one of the best players in the world.
It's almost never a real discussion with him anyway.You missed the its an indicator part. Not surprising because you almost never enter discussions in good faith.
I am waiting for a response like... Crosby Mackinnon and Kucherov won empty calorie hardware the years around them winning the cup.
No, I didn't. In fact, I specifically talked about indicators:You missed the its an indicator part.
The issue is, you're trying to randomly claim a poor and limited indicator of quality that barely anybody has as crucial, because Marner doesn't have it, while simultaneously trying to ignore much better and more accurate indicators and evaluations of player quality that show Marner to be a top tier player in the league. You're also being inconsistent in how you apply this to Marner and Nylander. Seems as if you're the one not entering the discussion in good faith.At best, it's a player quality indicator, but you're already ignoring better quality indicators.
I would do what Yzerman did with Stamkos and make each a take it or leave it contract offer. If they leave, you move on. Rather take a step back than running it back for a 10th year, assuming they do not get past round 2 this year.I actually factor in hardware and playoff performances. Marner doesn't have any good games 5 6 7. Hardly comes through in clutch situations. He is paid quite a bit by local endorsements. His brand is nothing in other markets. I would let him test the market no matter what. Same with JT.
Show me don't tell. Let's get to the conference finals on two of the biggest bs contracts ever signed. No results. Time to put up or shut up.
Seems like the smart/logical/right move if they do not cave because they think/believe he might walk for nothing. Not sure why the Marner camp wants to wait if the Leafs are willing to sign him in the regular season unless the Leafs are lowballing them. Whatever that means when Leafs are probably willing to pay him 50% more than Reinhart and make him one of the top 5 paid players in the league (as per Mirtle).
It's almost never a real discussion with him anyway.
Beyond the fact that some of his pronouncements are so outrageous that they virtually demand rebuttal, I don't see why anyone engages him.
7 million is a fair deal for JT as long as the contract is 3 years or less. 112 players made 7 million or more last season, JT was 67th in Scoring on top of being top 10in face offs won and number 1 in board battles won, as was stated during last nights game.Tavares wants 7M? pfft. Let him walk.
You can easily find better value on the open market for 7 mil.
I'd take him for a home town discount of about 3. He owes us that for sure.
The statement that there are better indicators of player quality than hardware like Hart Trophies is pretty special. Not sure it cracks the top 10 in terms of outrageousness, though.It's almost never a real discussion with him anyway.
Beyond the fact that some of his pronouncements are so outrageous that they virtually demand rebuttal, I don't see why anyone engages him.