Sidney Crosby Top 5 player of all time

Status
Not open for further replies.
Seriously you guys heard of Sakic, Yzerman, Rocket Richard, Esposito the list is long Crosby is not even in top ten not even close. Crosby wins sure but he does not dominate like others have before and won also. Just because he's one of the best now doesn't make him an all time great.

Yikes. He's better than everyone you listed.

Stop living in the past.
 
Those careers are over, Crosby's isn't. He has two to three years of quality hockey still in him. He will be up there in cups, PPG and playoff multiple points to cement his legacy. To me he is the most complete center and maybe player ever.
 
They dominated when they played compared to Crosby and still won. Crosby is a great player but he doesn't outshine other players by large enough margins to be considered all time great.Those guys played alot longer as well and honestly I think they were more skilled. Everyone today wants to say this player is better then so and so but really just because your the best now doesn't make you the best ever. Iv'e read people claiming whose better Mario or Crosby? To even ask that is a joke Mario was twice the player Crosby ever was. People love to pump current players and thats fine but in my opinion Sakic and Yzerman were better players. I watched those two and they just dominated like Crosby to me has never done.

I don't know what to tell you, but you're wrong. Very very wrong.
 
He could maybe slip into the 10 spot on a top 10 list but he's definitely not in the top 5.

Sorry, but he is in the top 5 now.

19226052.png
 
I don't know if he is top 5. I'm a huge fan, but there is still some time to play it out. It's funny, though, the mental gymnastics people are performing to claim he isn't.

On the one hand Beliveau has 10 cups, so he's better than Crosby. The next post, cups are team achievements so you can't really count those for Crosby. The "debatable" Smythes come up, because "stats in the final", yet these are probably the same people who have thought Toews was on Crosby's level the past several years. It's insane.

What you do have is this: 12th fastest to reach 1000 points, in a very low scoring era. In fewer than 800 games is already 77th all time in scoring. In a career with possibly the greatest goal scorer in the history of the game, he has 2 goal scoring titles and is the second highest goal scorer for his time in the league(even with all the missed games). He is 19th all time in playoff points. He has 3 Cups, 2 Smythes, 2 Harts and Pearsons.

What I do know is that when you need to parse and nitpick and frame things certain ways in order to discredit him as top 5, it suggests to me the case is a lot stronger than some would like to admit.
 
Always love lists that forget goalies and defenseman not named Orr

1 gold medal
4 Stanley Cups
1 Comm Smythe
7 Norris Trophies

Crosby is amazing but let's not pretend other amazing players don't get their due. The person list above typically isn't even in people's Top 5 for Dmen, let alone all time. And yet he was widely regarded as the best dman in the league in the last 30 years.
 
Everyone forgetting about Jagr. Gretz, Lemeuix, Jagr, Howe, Orr. Don't think he's passed any of those guys yet

Jagr does tend to get overlooked. Peak Jagr was right up there with the greats. I think the knock on him though is he could never get it done in the playoffs (without Lemieux).
 
Both Conn Smythe trophies were questionable

Questionable is the wrong word. "Close" would be the right one.

Could have given this year's to Crosby or Malkin - it was basically a toss up. Could have given last year's to Crosby, Kessel, or Murray - and the voting was close because it was truly debatable. And 2009 you could have given it to either Malkin or Crosby - could make a good case for either.
 
Because both men faced 10x better teams & opposition during their careers compared to today. Can you see Crosby surviving the 90's with the likes of Scott Stevens & Chris Pronger in their prime? Doubtful.

Yes very easily.

You do know that Crosby and Sakic had overlapping careers, yes?

Sakic was a very well conditioned athlete and was still very much a dominant player at 35-36, but he was vastly overshadowed by Crosby.
 
I have him in the top 5, hope he can make his way into the top 3 by some miracle one day. One of the most committed hockey players I have ever witnessed, one of a kind.
 
the best in the toughest era
You must not have been watching the sport in the 80's & 90's.

Yes very easily.

You do know that Crosby and Sakic had overlapping careers, yes?

Sakic was a very well conditioned athlete and was still very much a dominant player at 35-36, but he was vastly overshadowed by Crosby.
Not sure how someone in their 17th NHL season can be "overshadowed" by Crosby during that time in his career. Sakic was on the way out, and the likes of Crosby & Ovi were on the way in, pretty much sums it up.
 
Because both men faced 10x better teams & opposition during their careers compared to today. Can you see Crosby surviving the 90's with the likes of Scott Stevens & Chris Pronger in their prime? Doubtful.

This isn't a great argument for a lot of reasons. One obvious one being that Crosby beat Nick Lidstrom in the finals in '09.
 
This isn't a great argument for a lot of reasons. One obvious one being that Crosby beat Nick Lidstrom in the finals in '09.

think he was implying the much rougher era he would have had to survive in. Stevens and Prongers hits would be assault charges in todays pansy NHL
 
think he was implying the much rougher era he would have had to survive in. Stevens and Prongers hits would be assault charges in todays pansy NHL

Same exact thing was said about Gretzky and he seemed to do okay.

Not to mention that Pronger and Crosby did overlap...
 
This isn't a great argument for a lot of reasons. One obvious one being that Crosby beat Nick Lidstrom in the finals in '09.
Right, because Lidstrom being speared in the testicles in the previous round that caused him having to have surgery before the finals, nor Rafalski's herniated disc at the same time, had nothing to do with that success.

Especially seeing as you saw what they both did to Crosby the previous year when they were both healthy, even at 38 & 35.
 
Last edited:
think he was implying the much rougher era he would have had to survive in. Stevens and Prongers hits would be assault charges in todays pansy NHL
Exactly. The level of hard hitting/shutdown defensemen during that era is night & day compared to today.

Also, he would have to go up against the likes of Hasek, Brodeur, Roy, Joseph, Belfour, Richter, Vernon, among many others, in their prime.
 
Can't compare era's. No question in their time Gretzky, Mario, and many others were great. Crosby is great now. But there is one difference that today's players are superior to those other times. Howe is a great player but he certainly wouldn't have the physical edge he enjoyed then. Mario was a monster but is he today with the size and strength of the players today? Goalies are so much better in today's game. Get past a couple big names of prior era's and that about it. In short, Crosby is a great player of this time. I don't take anything away from others accomplishments, but Crosby is the very best as he is now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad