The obvious point that they were consistent until they weren't is laughable.
The end result isn't being disputed. Rolling out the regular season doesn't matter argument misses the forest for the trees. Taking note of regular season inconsistencies gets you so far and then the testing ground begins. That's precisely how Detroit refined their club until once thought of core pieces were traded in favour of pieces that would define them in the playoffs. But it took time.
Jake Muzzin, TJ Brodie, Jack Campbell, Nick Foligno are all those types of (championship) depth adds. They certainly didn't detract from the team. They didn't play less than advertised. We give Foligno a mulligan for injury I'd think, but the rest -- correct me if I'm wrong -- played above expectation. And they're all Dubas adds. And they're all acquisitions with the playoffs in mind.
Game 5 was a fair win. The OT goal should be noted as a two on none, but ok, it was a game they probably should have won in regulation. Game 6 was a job. Non-call on the goaltender interference nets the first goal. A 5 on 3 for the second goal, and a deflection ten feet out in overtime. Game 7 was a fair win. Our club didn't show up. Pieces did. The club didn't.
So it's another year and it's another exit and this time in the worst way conceivable. Against a team we should beat. Happened to be Montreal to pour salt in the wound. We were up 3-1. And on and on...
But, but...It wasn't championship level Boston. It wasn't championship level Washington. And although our result is the same, our opponent and our road there wasn't.
There's a common denominator of two major pieces not showing up and redefining the series. It's not down to Nylander, who seems the more consistent playoffs player of "the big three". Tavares was injured. If Matthews and Marner can't take hold of this series, something they and they alone are expected to do, because their compensation screams it, and specifically in a series like this, then the hard decision, like Detroit had to make, comes down to moving one of them. It's not going to be a Rocket winner and a 6'3 number one center at that. At least not this round. But it sure looks like it might be Marner who under Babcock or Keefe doesn't seem to be able to engage the playoffs like the regular season at this point in his young career.
More importantly -- and Doughty was right when he was asked about the Tavares acquisition -- management didn't address this club's most glaring positional need and one EVERY championship team has: A true, stud, number one defenceman that will lead from the back.
It's entirely reasonable to ask the question, what does the club do with a healthy Tavares let alone a club with a healthy Tavares and a number one defenceman. Because we're simply not in a position to tear what's been imprecisely built down. Too many good young pieces and too much investment in pieces like Nylander and Tavares.
So you make the move, watch the development in the regular season and tinker for the playoffs with the same types of moves Dubas has made and hope for a healthy return.
I mean it all matters when building a championship team. I get the frustration. I'm a Leafs fan first, but I've always closely followed Detroit and I've had to witness what responsible team building looks like and what mismanagement looks like just as much as the next Leafs fan. But if you don't think the regular season matters and that there's some maxim hockey people have to trot out in order to champion one and not the other because there's only two choices then we disagree. Because it all matters.