Its bad in my eyes for purely selfish reasons. As a Leaf fan I need the cap to rise and the revenue from gambling is essential, so naturally I am against anything that puts that revenue in jeopardy.Bad in what sense? The bookies literally set their lines using insider info. As a hockey fan I'm all for someone using insider info against the bookies.
Now if he were out there sandbagging and making money off the Sens losing, that would be bad. Really bad.
The insider info is only bad in the eyes of the bookies, who will complain to the NHL, and the NHL will jump through whatever hoops needed because of how much money the bookies spend on NHL advertising
It would help if we knew what the rule Pinto is being punished for breaking. Fans care about why players are suspended half a season.
If it wasn’t betting on NHL games, then what was it? What else isn’t allowed?
A three sentence explanation and then saying “the matter is closed, no more comments” isn’t going to work here. All this will lead to is endless speculation and rumors.
View attachment 758195
And the hypocrisy of endlessly shilling for sports books during games doesn’t help here.
A legal investigation for what? Where do you see that info?They can’t say why because theres a legal investigation on going. Also the “hypocrisy” argument is hilarious to me. Is my workplace hypocritical because they serve alcohol but don’t allow employees to drink on the job? People throwing everything they can out there regardless if it makes sense or not to absolve a grown man of having to take any accountability is super cringeworthy
I think 41 games is punishment enough.Terrible guy!
Send him to Winnipeg![]()
naa send him to Toronto, we LOVE our reclamation projectsI think 41 games is punishment enough.
Poor choice of words on my part but certainly seems to be a component hereA legal investigation for what? Where do you see that info?
Check the fine print on the statement;I don’t see how this matters outside of betting on NHL games but maybe in his ignorant… can someone rationalize the logic?
I mean if he were really doing that, wouldn't the league come down on him harder than just 41 games? 41 games seems way too lenient if his activities involved NHL games at all even if he wasn't the one making the actual bets. Plus didn't one of the betting sites/apps flag his account? Sounds like he was placing bets himself.I am thinking Pinto was passing inside info related to the sens to a 3rd party who would then make the bets and Shane would get a cut.
Poor choice of words on my part but certainly seems to be a component here
I thought the 41 games was the entire punishment though??welcome to the oilers
The investigation began in the summer, meaning his bad decisions were last season.Are you sure that the environment will help him heal and learn from this mistake. I think the way the team has treated him likely drove him to being distressed and then making bad decisions. Poor guy would be best off in Vancouver. But we can be paying too much for a distressed asset and he needs time to work on himself and self reflect.
I would put a wager on Pinto appealing this.
As per previous comments,I would put a wager on Pinto appealing this.
Considering Pinto and the NHLPA negotiated the settlement for punishment, and nobody will be appealing, it’s fair to scrap that logic.The timing of this is incredibly shady. The only unsigned RFA gets hit with a gambling suspension while his team is in cap hell unable to sign him? Now he gets suspended and they can get him for his QO?
One helluva lucky coincidence for the Sens
oof, this aint budThe NHL is an embarrassment. The hypocrisy here is incredible.
If the NHL were hiding something then Pinto, the Senators, and NHLPA are absolutely free to scream from the rooftops what really happened and that they are being treated unfairly.LOL. Right. The league really are fools. They think they are going to make a statement like that and now it's all going to just blow over? What a bunch of clowns. This doesn't go away until the public knows what exactly happened.