JrFischer54
Registered User
- Apr 4, 2017
- 10,911
- 4,520
fitz might have wanted that guy the rangers took one spot ahead but muk was next on the list. when you realistically think about it there are only so many teams behind that pick so his option of trade partners is little then you run the risk of someone taking "your guy" what were the devils really going to pick up in a trade back of 4-5 spots? granted fitz might have come out and said he explored a trade back (not sure if he did) even if so i still think thats just lip service to us fans as a "see I tried to trade back but couldn't" an extra 3rd round pick? big deal i rather get the guy that was next up on the list even if it was a "reach" the kid has the tools if he can put it together its a great pick. taking a timeout there only further lessens your trade leverage and makes you look like a fool for getting "snaked" and not having a back up pick ready to go.