GAGLine
Registered User
- Sep 17, 2007
- 23,295
- 23,605
Oops this guy after tonight lmaoOMG. Did you really just hit enter on an emoji? I'm literally shaking RN! I can't take you seriously anymore.
Care to elaborate? Since we're in this topic, I assume you mean a Carolina fan being concerned that one of our players was injured? Which is nothing to celebrate, and if you do that with any player, you need to take a hard look in the mirror. Or that our season ended? I can't say I'm surprised because as I've said on HF, there have been concerns/problems with my team this year. At the end of the day, this is just a sport though.Oops this guy after tonight lmao
I think people are just coming around to the idea that head trauma is not an exciting part of the sport now that we have seen the repercussions of it. This hit was clean but it really shouldn't be and I don't see it being so in 5-10 years time. Any contact with the head, incidental or not, should be penalized in the same way an accidental high stick is still a penalty. There is no need to be blowing players up to separate them from the puck.Hope Jarvis is alright after the Trouba hit. Feel fine player especially on the PP.
The hit looked clean to me, just as all his other hits/collisions. Hockey fans under 30 don't appreciate what Trouba brings to the table.
He never elbowed Crosby which drew the most controversy (because it was Sid) no matter what word salad @frisco spews, as well what Pens fans/Crosby fanboys will try & "reveal" in this thread.
Myself and a few other Rangers fans literally proved the elbow screenshot was just an optical illusion, and Pens fans suddenly didn't care enough to argue it I guess. Then the thread got closed after 65 f***ing pages.
I understand the sentiment, but it's impossible to take all potential head injuries out of the game without eliminating hitting entirely. The game is just too fast and the players too big.I think people are just coming around to the idea that head trauma is not an exciting part of the sport now that we have seen the repercussions of it. This hit was clean but it really shouldn't be and I don't see it being so in 5-10 years time. Any contact with the head, incidental or not, should be penalized in the same way an accidental high stick is still a penalty. There is no need to be blowing players up to separate them from the puck.
Stop making it about the Leafs.Dubas traded a 1st round pick just to dodge 1 year of 6.5 mil only to still lose in the first round (PO qualifier). That pick ended up being 13 OA.
He then traded another 1st round pick for an injured foligno and we lost again in the first round. That pick was 26th.
Has to be one of the worst gms in the league.
Who else could inherit such a promising team and have exactly zero series wins after four years?
Thought Jarvis saw Truckba coming.
The necessary play? He created nothing, got rocked, and left the game. Rangers ended up with a powerplay and scored.He did. He took the hit to make the necessary play.
Bumping this thread to do victory laps over the injury is gross behavior.
The necessary play? He created nothing, got rocked, and left the game. Rangers ended up with a powerplay and scored.
Hitting would have to cease to exist under these parameters.I think people are just coming around to the idea that head trauma is not an exciting part of the sport now that we have seen the repercussions of it. This hit was clean but it really shouldn't be and I don't see it being so in 5-10 years time. Any contact with the head, incidental or not, should be penalized in the same way an accidental high stick is still a penalty. There is no need to be blowing players up to separate them from the puck.
I understand the sentiment, but it's impossible to take all potential head injuries out of the game without eliminating hitting entirely. The game is just too fast and the players too big.
I think it’s a really bad idea. at that point you should just remove hitting. the game is too fast and there are a lot of shorter players in the game where it becomes very tough to hit them without making any head contact just due to the size difference.I think people are just coming around to the idea that head trauma is not an exciting part of the sport now that we have seen the repercussions of it. This hit was clean but it really shouldn't be and I don't see it being so in 5-10 years time. Any contact with the head, incidental or not, should be penalized in the same way an accidental high stick is still a penalty. There is no need to be blowing players up to separate them from the puck.
I think people are just coming around to the idea that head trauma is not an exciting part of the sport now that we have seen the repercussions of it. This hit was clean but it really shouldn't be and I don't see it being so in 5-10 years time. Any contact with the head, incidental or not, should be penalized in the same way an accidental high stick is still a penalty. There is no need to be blowing players up to separate them from the puck.