I tried to read more than your response to me, but even that was painful.
The only power the Rangers have in a potential deal is to not do it. Miller will be coveted by every buyer this year and will garner a large return. Your idea of "take this player or we won't deal with you"doesnt exist in a world where team A calls about player for team B. Canucks set the terms of what we want, and Rangers either walk away or pay up. As a fan it is easy to say they will walk away, but if they are serious they will pay.
Trouba makes 8m, has a NMC 2 seasons after this and then M-NTC after. Do you really think that teams will
A) Want to acquire Trouba at 8m a season, when he isn't really worth it now
Or
B) the teams he is willing to go to either wanting him, or having the cap to get him
You guys are stuck with him for 4 more years after this.
we agree and disagree
like I said, Rangers control the offer, Canucks control the accept.
Either they agree or meet in the middle or no deal.
What someone else may offer may be higher or lower overall, or better or worse specific pieces.
Whatever they are, they are. What they are not, they are not.
If you are not familiar with the concept, there is something called an opportunity cost, and it applies differently whether you undertake a specific action or not.
Acquiring Miller by NY should not be undertaken at all, EXCEPT and unless if it is as I described for value, not overpayment AND with Lindgren included and JT at half retained. This is solely to give NY a chance to keep Miller without consequences of trying to remain cap compliant.
If that does not work for VAN, fine,