I’ll do “letting the cat out of the bag”, though…Now do "one fell swoop"
“Transport billionaire Michael Andlauer is the early favourite to be the next owner of the NHL’s Ottawa Senators, as the former beer-league goalie goes up against some of Canada’s wealthiest entrepreneurs in a battle for membership in hockey’s most exclusive club.”
Billionaire Michael Andlauer early favourite in the battle to buy NHL’s Ottawa Senators
Actor Ryan Reynolds confirms in a Tonight Show interview with Jimmy Fallon he is interested in being the face of a consortium that buys the team: ‘a fancy way of saying I need a sugar mommy or a sugar daddy’www.theglobeandmail.com
I’d take these articles with a grain of salt tbh. These are legit billionaires out there competing to buy this team, and my guess is they’re willing to play hardball to make it happen. Who knows who’s leaking what and for what reason“Transport billionaire Michael Andlauer is the early favourite to be the next owner of the NHL’s Ottawa Senators, as the former beer-league goalie goes up against some of Canada’s wealthiest entrepreneurs in a battle for membership in hockey’s most exclusive club.”
Billionaire Michael Andlauer early favourite in the battle to buy NHL’s Ottawa Senators
Actor Ryan Reynolds confirms in a Tonight Show interview with Jimmy Fallon he is interested in being the face of a consortium that buys the team: ‘a fancy way of saying I need a sugar mommy or a sugar daddy’www.theglobeandmail.com
Chomping
I’ll go with Merriam-Webster Webster, you can go your way.Champing or chomping, as Paul Giamatti made clear in Billions.
If Reynolds is flying into Ottawa for the game you have to think he's coming to have some talks with various people.
Looks like he's serious as hell.
Bruce said he was sitting with bankers that have overseen many NHL team transactionsDoubt he was in town to “talk turkey”…but did see him in conversation with Chris Phillips?
Far as I know, he’s the first to have direct talks with a team representative (Phillips” and they say the “early bird catches the worm” BUT the “second mouse get the cheese”!
Let’s see if anyone ”puts their money where their mouth is”.Bruce said he was sitting with bankers that have overseen many NHL team transactions
In the Ryan Reynolds movie "Waiting" they say "chomping at the bit" as part of a line. So I'm with our future hockey ruler and the script he approved nearly 20 years ago.NO, it’s actually Champing
Definition of CHAMPING AT THE BIT
waiting in an impatient way to do something… See the full definitionwww.merriam-webster.com
JeeeyyyaaaaahhhhSorry guys there's been a mixup, it's actually Ryan Lochte who wants to buy the Senators.
Nice for Reynolds to show up to the game.I wasn't sure he was serious but after last night and then being in Ottawa next day shows legit seriousness. He knows he would be minority stake holder but star power is always good for the Sens and NHL.
Thanks for sharing. I had a feeling Bettman might have a favorite that he's likely been dealing with for awhile. Andlauer's worth is only $1.1 B though & that was a little lower than I thought for a NHL team owner. Interesting stuff all-in-all nonetheless.“Transport billionaire Michael Andlauer is the early favourite to be the next owner of the NHL’s Ottawa Senators, as the former beer-league goalie goes up against some of Canada’s wealthiest entrepreneurs in a battle for membership in hockey’s most exclusive club.”
Billionaire Michael Andlauer early favourite in the battle to buy NHL’s Ottawa Senators
Actor Ryan Reynolds confirms in a Tonight Show interview with Jimmy Fallon he is interested in being the face of a consortium that buys the team: ‘a fancy way of saying I need a sugar mommy or a sugar daddy’www.theglobeandmail.com
The article says he would sell his stake in the Habs.Andlauer owns 20% of the Habs. Would he not need to give up his stake or does that not apply to minority ownership?
plz someone with f u money
In the Ryan Reynolds movie "Waiting" they say "chomping at the bit" as part of a line. So I'm with our future hockey ruler and the script he approved nearly 20 years ago.
Champing is technically correct, but chomping is widely accepted. This isn't like a then/than situation.And that was wrong, so you can be wrong too.
Some people hear “ there’s a bathroom on the right” and that is incorrect, and others hear “there’s a Bad Moon on the rise”…. And they would be correct
So when A mistake is repeated often enough, it becomes “accepted” but those who don’t know the correct phrase?Champing is technically correct, but chomping is widely accepted. This isn't like a then/than situation.
You're wrong, man. Language evolves. You may not like it — I understand being stuck in your ways, much as I am with the word 'literally' also meaning 'not literally' — but culture causes shifts in the way language is used all the time.So when A mistake is repeated often enough, it becomes “accepted” but those who don’t know the correct phrase?
you know who does that? Low knowledge people, who also use then instead of than, and people who use there instead of their or they’re.
“A nod’s as good as a wink to a blind horse.”
Yes Monty Python got that wrong…