By my twisted logic that's still more than Schief so I expect him to be a better player and I'd bet he will be.
Therefore more criticized when they play equal.
I don't understand why people keep bringing up Scheifele's deal and comparing him to our other young players.... Do you not think Scheifele wouldn't have signed for more if he had a resume that supported it?
Scheifele's first three years:
34 points, 49 points and 61 points.
Laine's
64 points and 70 points and has 36 so far this year. He is also going to have three straight years of over 30 goals.
Laine's performance before his second contract kicks the crap out of Scheifele's. Laine also did it at younger age. Had we actually bridged Scheifele because he hadn't proven over a significant amount of time he was an elite player we would be paying him 10 million a year right now. Mark wasn't signed to an elite player deal as he had only showed about half a season of elite play. Laine has shown about 2 and a quarter year of it. He will and deserves to get more as his resume is pretty darn amazing for his age. There are very few who have accomplished as much as he has at this stage of their careers.