sandysan
Registered User
- Dec 7, 2011
- 24,834
- 6,388
Especially with what Kane said after their loss.This is such a stupid post.
Especially with what Kane said after their loss.This is such a stupid post.
Didnt they just win over finland who won over usa and canada
Sweden is the only consistant team, but whc is always big here in sweden ever since the 70s.
a disturbing post from a disturbing poster.This is such a stupid post.
Never knew canadians and finns are such sore losers when they complain at a free gold for sweden against the team that just knocked them out.If it so free why didnt you win?
Not a lot of killer instinct from Canada all tournament long.
I'm used to a lot more passion from Canadian teams.
As easy a gold as Sweden will ever get.
USA should easily take the bronze too.
The argument in the 'free gold' discussions are the final matchup, always.
A team wins a 'free gold' no matter how the game went if the heavy underdog loses as expected.
Or lucky, you guys have a guaranteed (or free if you like) gold medal, everybody knows the cinderella team always loses in the final.
what specifically did peters do that was bad?That was some of the absolute worst coaching I have ever seen. Hopefully he brings this same coaching to Calgary.
Sure it is. It was said by several posters.Yeah, I don't think this is the case at all.
I should dig out some of your old posts.
Sure it is. It was said by several posters.
It's his haircut.what specifically did peters do that was bad?
The way Sweden plays is always difficult to oppose for Switzerland, this year as well. The match against Sweden was the only one were I felt the team was kinda helpless, only the fact that the swedes decided to circle around instead of shooting was the only thing that kept the match kinda close."Underdog" obliterated Teams
1. Finland
2. Canada
It won't be easy game for Team Sweden. At least it won't be if Swedes take it as "free Gold".
Both above games versus Switzerland should make that clear - in a Team Sweden's video-replay session.
One player makes a whole team?
Any nation in any sport will complain about 'easy golds' if their team isn't in said final and/or the final isn't a 'fair' affair, as if there is an underdog which loses as expected.Never knew canadians and finns are such sore losers when they complain at a free gold for sweden against the team that just knocked them out. If it so free why didnt you win?
Obliterated?
Really?
I don't think he ran the bench well at all.what specifically did peters do that was bad?
Maybe little too strong choice of word, but the fact remains: Neither Canada nor Finland, but Switzerland is going to play in the Final.
So, in this context "you can erase both of those teams from the books concerning Teams competing in The Final" = 'obliterate'
Canada's goaltending was no where near good enough. There were not a lot of good goaltenders to choose from. Price turned them down after a tough year and I guess Smith, Dubnyk and Jones turned them down or weren't asked.only concern is with Canadian goal tending.
He has $50 million after taxes. He'll be fine.Hopefully the USA wins tomorrow because this trash team deserves to go home empty handed. I feel bad for McDavid though
Never knew canadians and finns are such sore losers when they complain at a free gold for sweden against the team that just knocked them out. If it so free why didnt you win?
Never knew canadians and finns are such sore losers when they complain at a free gold for sweden against the team that just knocked them out. If it so free why didnt you win?
At least one of our stars will win the gold, hoping for Josi![]()
So what does that mean? He didn't shorten it enough? Shortened it too much?I don't think he ran the bench well at all.