DitClapper
Registered User
- May 15, 2014
- 7,896
- 348
It's actually interesting. The poll on the canucks' board was about 90% against signing Lucic while the poll on the Oiler's board is about 80% in favour.
Chia is in #yoloswag mode right now.
I'll support my team with whatever happens, ya never know how it can all play out.
Oh my...
Signing him until he's 35? He's a good player, and I think he'll play a top 6 level a bit longer than most seem to think but wow that could get ugly during the last 3 years.
Which makes perfect sense. Vancouver is a team on the decline barely holding on with it's old core, while Edmonton is a team that has all it's pieces in place and needs to step up.
You sign a player like Lucic when your team is ready to compete, giving you that top line forward now for free, and you don't have to wait for a prospect to develop or make a trade. If Edmonton can be in the playoffs the next 5 years, they won't worry too much how how bad Lucic's contract is at the end.
Vancouver on the other hand, we're going nowhere with or without Lucic. If we sign him now, it just prolongs the mediocrity, and the anchor portion of the contract kicks in at the worst time when we should have a fresh faced team.
Lucic is good for Edmonton, but bad for Vancouver.
Benning accidentally did something good!
But it appears Loui Eriksson is in Benning's sight. Per Sekeres.
You mean he's good for Edmonton from Vancouver's perspective.
For Vancouver's sake, hopefully all the big free-agents sign elsewhere so they can properly finish low enough for a good draft pick.
Which makes perfect sense. Vancouver is a team on the decline barely holding on with it's old core, while Edmonton is a team that has all it's pieces in place and needs to step up.
You sign a player like Lucic when your team is ready to compete, giving you that top line forward now for free, and you don't have to wait for a prospect to develop or make a trade. If Edmonton can be in the playoffs the next 5 years, they won't worry too much how how bad Lucic's contract is at the end.
Vancouver on the other hand, we're going nowhere with or without Lucic. If we sign him now, it just prolongs the mediocrity, and the anchor portion of the contract kicks in at the worst time when we should have a fresh faced team.
Lucic is good for Edmonton, but bad for Vancouver.
Lucic just turned 28. He's not 30-31. I don't think his deal will be Clarkson/Brown bad at all. I also don't think Nill would offer Lucic 7 years, either.
I think he'd be a great add for the Stars, just not for 7 years.
ive never seen the top UFA heading into July 1st being so not wanted by every fan from all teams haha... very odd
Don't cheer yet Nuck fans. Wait till Benning signs Vanek and Brouwer to huge contracts
Milan Lucic instead of Taylor Hall in 3-4 years will look like the worst management decision of all time next to the Subban -Weber deal,
Please Oilers, 7 yr deal . please.
I am guessing he still isn't happy with their fans after 2011 and money being equal he'd prefer a team like Edmonton.