ValJamesDuex
Registered User
- Nov 4, 2021
- 10,041
- 5,639
Just like me dekeing out all the kids on Christmas with the statue of liberty
Lot of weird components of this mock, a few to note:usatoday mock has 8 receivers at the bottom of the first through the top of the 2nd. I'm not too familiar with the NC man they have to the Bill's, anyone here a acc guy ?
Quarterbacks crowd the top of this new 2-round NFL mock draft
How many quarterbacks go in the first round of this new mock draft?draftwire.usatoday.com
Good analysis. I don’t do any analysis of a position until draft year +3 years so I haven’t looked at most of the year you did.My analysis of what all of this means:
Contrary to some opinion, where you draft receivers really matters.
-Use a first round pick and you've got an over 50% chance at WR1 or better and a 90% chance of at least a startable player.
-Day 2 you've got a decent chance at a starter or better (nearly 50%), but if you need a bonafide WR1 or home run, you're really sledding up hill (15% chance).
-Day three you're pretty much throwing darts. ARSB aside, you've got a 15% chance at a starter and virtually zero chance at anything more. 85% chance of a bust.
-Want a superstar WR1? Almost absolutely needs to come in the first
Wha does it mean for the Bills? If you're hoping they'll eventually find a Diggs replacement by taking day 2 and day 3 shots, it's unlikely. They can probably get a Davis replacement on day 2, or on day 3 if they take enough shots. But if you're concerned about a longterm WR1 guy to someday supplant Diggs, look to the first and the first only.
I think both of those positions should be in play in the first, depending on where the highest potential talent sits.Good analysis. I don’t do any analysis of a position until draft year +3 years so I haven’t looked at most of the year you did.
Here’s the question: why are we looking for a Diggs replacement?
Shouldn’t Beane be looking for a Dawkins or Miller replacement in the 1st round?
My argument about not taking a receiver in the first round has never been about replacing Diggs. Why spend that pick now when Diggs is still a legit #1 receiver.
Use a 2nd on Brendan Rice to replace Davis and call it a day.
Replace Diggs when he needs replacement.
Diggs is signed and Dawkins is a free agent after next season. I’d rather grab the OT and get the cost controlled seasons rather than overpay for an aging player.I think both of those positions should be in play in the first, depending on where the highest potential talent sits.
FWIW, Dawkins is a year younger than Diggs and plays the position that tends to age more gracefully.
Why Nix not in top 50?Lot of weird components of this mock, a few to note:
-I don't think Bo Nix goes top 50, much less top half of the first round (there's many QBs that should go before him)
-Fashanu is considered a generational LT prospect, he's in contention with MHJ for first non-QB taken. Not falling to 9.
-Odunze falling to 16 would shock me. He's going to challenge Nablers for WR2 and should go 5-10 range.
-That WR pick doesn't super excite me, but I don't know the player super well. Mims a few picks later would excite me a lot more
Is the analysis flawed or do you just not like the results? The hit rate at WR is significantly higher in the first than in the rest of the draft. Sorry that doesn’t confirm to your priors that it’s easy to find a receiver later in the draft.Why Nix not in top 50?
as for your “ analysis”. I think it’s flawed. I prefer to look at your top 4 WR by team and assess them that way by draft
there is bias analysis there where you are judging player X not being able to break through a team vs re rivers doing well because of team need/ open spots/ system.
drafting depends greatly in what this team does. If the win the Super Bowl expect many vets to be sent off and they look at next 1-2 as a change over/ youth movement .
Why Nix not in top 50?
as for your “ analysis”. I think it’s flawed. I prefer to look at your top 4 WR by team and assess them that way by draft
there is bias analysis there where you are judging player X not being able to break through a team vs re rivers doing well because of team need/ open spots/ system.
drafting depends greatly in what this team does. If the win the Super Bowl expect many vets to be sent off and they look at next 1-2 as a change over/ youth movement .
The just released Ifedi to make room for Jones, so I imagine they’re looking for a vet OT for the PS in case one of our starters goes down.Veteran experience for p/s down the stretch or they really want to run it in Miami and beyond ?
That's not necessarily the worst thing for Chicago though. Imagine Fields throwing to Harrison Jr, Moore and Kmet. If Chicago's O-line could hold up.....that could be very, very dangerous.Bears fans must be pulling their hair out, lol. It's not worth the discussion of what-ifs however there is a realistic scenario where Carolina wins their final two games and the Bears no longer possess the top draft pick. (Carolina traded their 2024 first round pick to Chicago so they could draft Bryce Young)
likely means Ifedi is not interested in the practice squad and or is signing elsewhere then ?The just released Ifedi to make room for Jones, so I imagine they’re looking for a vet OT for the PS in case one of our starters goes down.
I think either is possible, or perhaps even they just want to see what's out there.likely means Ifedi is not interested in the practice squad and or is signing elsewhere then ?