Prospect Info: Sean Farrell, C/LW, 124th Overall

HuGo Sham

MR. CLEAN-up ©Runner77
Apr 7, 2010
28,633
20,962
Montreal
he's tailored made for the big ice in europe. he thrived there during the worlds and i could see him in the Swiss league sooner than later. Big ice and 0 physical play to worry about
 
  • Like
Reactions: Levard

Estimated_Prophet

Registered User
Mar 28, 2003
11,140
12,320

so now we are going to act like being 2nd best in the NCAA isn't going to get you a lot of hype around here?

It definitely got him hype around here but that is not the same as the statement that he was a "big time" prospect. These are very different statements with only the former being true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MasterD

JianYang

Registered User
Sep 29, 2017
19,497
18,840
Hype on this forum doesn't mean you're a big time prospect

"Big time prospect" can be interpreted many ways but he was clearly one of monteal's top prospects at one time.

I don't recall anyone saying he was a slam dunk but he had some impressive accomplishments for his resume at a young age
 
  • Like
Reactions: Harry Kakalovich

Ezpz

No mad pls
Apr 16, 2013
15,312
11,809
I mean I don't know what the surprise is. He swapped places in the lineup with Davidson and kidney and with their minutes from last year he's producing the same way they did. It's clear the new coach isn't a fan the same way Leblanc got pushed down in Hamilton before.

It's up to Farrell to prove he deserves a chair. More likely he is traded in a prospect swap but if he can't handle AHL diversity he's not going to be an NHLer.

Leblanc retired rather than put in the work.

Davidson has a better motor so it's hard to say he should lose his spot now. Farrell kind of has to learn the defensive side and improve his skating and wait for an injury.
 

Natey

GOATS
Sponsor
Aug 2, 2005
62,837
9,375
Hype on this forum doesn't mean you're a big time prospect
True, but being a top NCAA player most definitely does qualify as top prospect. He would have got a contract from every team in the league if he wasn't drafted.
 

MasterD

Giggidy Giggidy Goo
Jul 1, 2004
5,950
5,417
True, but being a top NCAA player most definitely does qualify as top prospect. He would have got a contract from every team in the league if he wasn't drafted.
Again though, top NCAA player by what criterias? Simply point production?

Someone brought up Corey Locke, great comparison. Charles Hudon produced a lot in junior and AHL, was he a top NHL prospect? Matheson produces a lot of points as a dman, is he a top NHLer?

Stats don't tell the whole story. Most people here, myself include, don't watch tons of junior/college games, and we don't know much about these guys.

As far as I'm concerned, Farrell never had what it takes in terms of physical ability to be considered a top NHL prospect. Weak, slow, weak shot. He is extremely smart, though, which allowed him to make it in college against similar-level players.

He can probably make a nice career for himself in Europe, but I doubt many NHL teams would trade for him right now. Except if they need AHL help.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad