Prospect Info: Sean Farrell, C/LW, 124th Overall

HuGo Sham

MR. CLEAN-up ©Runner77
Apr 7, 2010
28,638
20,973
Montreal
he's tailored made for the big ice in europe. he thrived there during the worlds and i could see him in the Swiss league sooner than later. Big ice and 0 physical play to worry about
 
  • Like
Reactions: Levard

Estimated_Prophet

Registered User
Mar 28, 2003
11,141
12,323

so now we are going to act like being 2nd best in the NCAA isn't going to get you a lot of hype around here?

It definitely got him hype around here but that is not the same as the statement that he was a "big time" prospect. These are very different statements with only the former being true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MasterD

Ezpz

No mad pls
Apr 16, 2013
15,314
11,812
I mean I don't know what the surprise is. He swapped places in the lineup with Davidson and kidney and with their minutes from last year he's producing the same way they did. It's clear the new coach isn't a fan the same way Leblanc got pushed down in Hamilton before.

It's up to Farrell to prove he deserves a chair. More likely he is traded in a prospect swap but if he can't handle AHL diversity he's not going to be an NHLer.

Leblanc retired rather than put in the work.

Davidson has a better motor so it's hard to say he should lose his spot now. Farrell kind of has to learn the defensive side and improve his skating and wait for an injury.
 

MasterD

Giggidy Giggidy Goo
Jul 1, 2004
5,950
5,417
True, but being a top NCAA player most definitely does qualify as top prospect. He would have got a contract from every team in the league if he wasn't drafted.
Again though, top NCAA player by what criterias? Simply point production?

Someone brought up Corey Locke, great comparison. Charles Hudon produced a lot in junior and AHL, was he a top NHL prospect? Matheson produces a lot of points as a dman, is he a top NHLer?

Stats don't tell the whole story. Most people here, myself include, don't watch tons of junior/college games, and we don't know much about these guys.

As far as I'm concerned, Farrell never had what it takes in terms of physical ability to be considered a top NHL prospect. Weak, slow, weak shot. He is extremely smart, though, which allowed him to make it in college against similar-level players.

He can probably make a nice career for himself in Europe, but I doubt many NHL teams would trade for him right now. Except if they need AHL help.
 

Estimated_Prophet

Registered User
Mar 28, 2003
11,141
12,323
True, but being a top NCAA player most definitely does qualify as top prospect. He would have got a contract from every team in the league if he wasn't drafted.
That is an egregiously incorrect assertion.

Being a top NCAA scorer has been irrelevant in so many cases over the years with respect to being a top NHL prospect. Getting a contract and being a top prospect are two entirely different things.

Farrell was exclusively over hyped on this board and was not a big deal anywhere else. That is not to say that he was not an interesting prospect but no team would have at any point traded anything significant to acquire him from us. He was and is a dart toss who was never likely to be an impactful NHLer.

His brain has always been intriguing but he is tiny and a below average skater and was always a longshot. I am not entirely writing him off as a future NHLer but I do not see a future in Montreal for Farrell
 
  • Like
Reactions: themilosh

Ad

Upcoming events

  • HV 71 @ Lulea Hockey
    HV 71 @ Lulea Hockey
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $85.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Croatia vs Portugal
    Croatia vs Portugal
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $50,050.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Poland vs Scotland
    Poland vs Scotland
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Serbia vs Denmark
    Serbia vs Denmark
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad