What is solid is that, from that bunch, Suzuki, Slafkovsky, Dach, Roy and, maybe, Farrell, have top-6 potential. Two are Cs (Suzuki and Dach) and three are wingers (Slafkovsky, Roy and Farrell).
IMO, as much as Farrell is talented, I'd rather Roy (as more of a sniper) on the top-6, beyond Slafkovsky and Caufield, along with anther power forward with more puck skills, overall, than Anderson.
Farrell and Anderson could well make good wingers for a 3rd line.
That's where this team becomes a monster team up front if we manage to draft a Big, talented C in 2023 and sign Dubois as an UFA in 2024.
Slafkovsky - Suzuki - Caufield
Dubois - Fantilli/Dvorsky - Roy
Farrell - Dach - Anderson
Heineman - Beck - Ylonen
Sure, none of the bolded players are established NHLers, but the talent is there and the potential is real. The fact that they aren't established players means that they could, along with a few higher priced Ds to go along with Guhle and Barron, maybe Harris, co-exist with a higher priced Suzuki, Caufield, Dubois and Anderson, at least for a few years!
Then, off a Cup run, hopefully, choices would need to be made. Dach and Anderson, of the third line above, would likely need to be moved and replaced by other players and the role of the third line might need to be changed?
Slafkovsky - Suzuki - Caufield
Dubois - Fantilli/Dvorsky - Roy
Farrell - Beck - Ylonen
Heineman - Kidney - Smilanic
*At this point, Kidney and Smilanic are purely instead as examples of the level of players since, by then, they will surely have moved on from the Hbas if they haven't already gotten their chance with the team.