A 2017 trade?Wow, really?
Ever heard of cast offs Lehkonen 22 cup winner or Sergachev 21 cup winner, on & on.
Hockeys not your game sport
A 2017 trade?Wow, really?
Ever heard of cast offs Lehkonen 22 cup winner or Sergachev 21 cup winner, on & on.
Hockeys not your game sport
not really, I would suggest editing him out of your post as he doesn't fit the argument you're trying to make.Okay 19-20 cup winner?
Better for ya?
Ceci might very well have value again come TDL. Even more likely if the Sharks are willing to retain. Teams are aiming high during the summer and most of the contenders are cap strap after signing their top guns. Which makes depth guys like Ceci very unattractive to them. It's another story come TDL. They then use all the remaining cap they have to acquire depth guys.
until reinbacher, mailloux and hutson are ready to form a GOOD d-unit (on the nhl level), savard might no longer is.Habs likely re-sign Savard. Long-term gives them Reinbacher, Mailloux, Savard on right side. Left side be Guhle, Hutson, Wifi. Struble 7th d-man. That should be good defense
Habs likely re-sign Savard. Long-term gives them Reinbacher, Mailloux, Savard on right side. Left side be Guhle, Hutson, Wifi. Struble 7th d-man. That should be good defense
Savard 34, no doubt it be short term contract. If he wants more, usually quality bottom pairing UFA availableI think they decide this sometime in Jan/Feb (right before the TDL). If the Habs are in the playoff bubble, Savard stays for the rest of the season. If we are not in the mix, Savard will be traded.
Savard extending? I'm sure the Habs are interested but term/AAV will have to line up for both the Habs and Savard. If Savard wants to stay and be part of something special, there is room for him. If Savard wants to get the most term/AAV he can get, we let him do that with another team.
Keep that hope aliveLarsson signing Savard value probably gone up. One less vet available at deadline
Big heavy right shot d-men usually in high demand thenKeep that hope alive
Ceci to Habs for a 1stBig heavy right shot d-men usually in high demand then
Habs aren't in cup contention. But yeah, if they were it be good tradeCeci to Habs for a 1st
Cody Ceci is also big heavy and right shot. I’d rather take him back than give up anything of consequence for SavardBig heavy right shot d-men usually in high demand then
Wait Ceci for a 1 st Is a good trade ? Now I’m starting to see the problem …Habs aren't in cup contention. But yeah, if they were it be good trade
We got more for Chiarot.Wait Ceci for a 1 st Is a good trade ? Now I’m starting to see the problem …
Was that a good idea on Floridas part ? Also you doubling down on your Ceci for a 1 st being a good trade stance ? Or we gonna walk that back ?We got more for Chiarot.
We got more for Chiarot.
If you had traded for Savard last year you would win the cup. Low cost really if he's difference in a cup.Was that a good idea on Floridas part ? Also you doubling down on your Ceci for a 1 st being a good trade stance ? Or we gonna walk that back ?
He wasn’t a difference maker for Tampa 4 years ago ( won despite him being very meh - that’s flattering his play ) so why would he be one now ? Hes gotten worse not better . Are you suggesting Savard on the Leafs equals cup last year ? Is that what I’m reading ? That along with the Ceci claim is well … something.If you had traded for Savard last year you would win the cup. Low cost really if he's difference in a cup.
We got unprotected first and a 4th for Chiarot. Savard types have sky high value at deadline.
Difference being Monahan can actually still play. The Chariot deal is one of the worst in recent memory so hardly a templateChariot, Monahan, Savard.
Dont argue, just accept that it will happen.