I think the post was in regards to someone not realizing that Ceci had been traded to San Jose . Another poster responded w something like “ if you don’t know that he’s been traded how can someone take your post seriously “
Savard wouldn't have moved the needle one bit. He would have been exposed like Vincent Desharnais was.
I get it. But the other guy tried to defend him and say his opinion was still valid by assigning the valuation, which was a 1st round pick. But he was still way off.
Hey now, that's not fair. Vinny can defend at the NHL level. The bottom absolutely fell out of Savard defensively.
That's true. Although the bottom kind of fell out from Vinnie in the latter stages of the playoffs too.
How's he blocking shots if behind the play?
Ya you guys are are correct and the insiders don't know dick about hockey.
insiders base their opinion on one game they saw four years ago.
That take is the most uninformed comment i have ever seen.
He’s blocking shots as he rarely has possession of the puck . Put it together …What are insiders saying about his play on the ice ? Who specifically is praising him ?
That's all of your main defencemen. Unless you're implying Montreals gaudy goals against number is the fault of the goalies, there has to be a reason that the Habs bleed goals against. My opinion is that the Habs defence is massively overrated by that fanbase. They have some good prospects coming, but as for the group they iced last year, it's a bunch of bottom pairing guys on a good team for the most part.
Habs reporters and insiders know their assignments. Kent Hughes uses them well to gas up whatever spare parts they're trying to offload at one point or another.
That’s why I was curious about the source …adds up
What insider has said anything about him in the last 5 months?
I expect he’s going to Ole his way out of this conversation. If he’s not well cooked yet he’s medium well at the very least .
You want to see it that badly search it yourself. There's enough of them so you shouldn't have any problem finding some.
Because he and his team can't clear the zone and have a hard time regaining puck possession when the other team has the puck in their zone.
You're the one making the claims that insiders are saying he is still good. You've put that claim out there, so the burden of proof is on you to supply the evidence. If you can't or won't, then the rest of us will just write your claim off as b.s. as you don't have any evidence to support it.
its a forum, you could just simply answer it or avoid replying
Otherwise known as I’ve got nothing to add to the conversation….^^
