Samsonov hurt ?

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
It would serve little purpose if Samsonov is out for a long time to sign a prospect goalie at this time.

It was warned that the GM was gambling running the past few weeks with only 2 healthy goalies under contract.
 
Wouldn’t Petruzelli be waiver exempt if he signed an ELC? Considering he’s on an AHL contract and no team gave him an NHL deal, anything could happen if he was waived, but can we sign him and play him first before we agonize about losing him on waivers?
 
With Keefe saying Samsonov is not traveling with the team they must have some plan on who the back up is for tomorrow.
 
Dubas didn’t trade a 1st, he traded 13 draft spots

The hyperbole isn’t necessary

He did trade a first then. I mean you did trade for a 2nd rounder that's trading a first

If that's the case, nobody ever really traded the first. They just moved down 40, 50 or 60 spots down

When you trade a 1st rounder, you traded a 1st. maybe not first over, but you traded the first
 
He did trade a first then. I mean you did trade for a 2nd rounder that's trading a first

If that's the case, nobody ever really traded the first. They just moved down 40, 50 or 60 spots down

When you trade a 1st rounder, you traded a 1st. maybe not first over, but you traded the first

My favorite Dubas trade is when he traded a 2nd for a 2nd + 3rd two years ago. Silly Ottawa, giving us a free 3rd round pick.
 
He did trade a first then. I mean you did trade for a 2nd rounder that's trading a first

If that's the case, nobody ever really traded the first. They just moved down 40, 50 or 60 spots down

When you trade a 1st rounder, you traded a 1st. maybe not first over, but you traded the first

Traded 13 spots in the draft, if you want to word it traded a low 1st for a high second that would also suffice. Saying “traded a 1st” is disingenuous and suggests he traded the full value of the 1st for no return.
 
Traded 13 spots in the draft, if you want to word it traded a low 1st for a high second that would also suffice. Saying “traded a 1st” is disingenuous and suggests he traded the full value of the 1st for no return.

Your argument was that he didn't trade a 1st. Which he did
What the return is yet to be determined in few years
But he did trade his 1st

Low or high, he traded his first

I guess leafs didnt' trade their first when they picked Dermott and Bracco instead of Konency
They just traded down. I guess 13 spots doesn't mean much

Gotcha
 
  • Like
Reactions: 57 Years No Cup
So, the Oilers love affair with ex Leafs is over?
I'm thrilled it was the oilers who ended up being the ones to pick up that grenade

You can’t say no when it literally was 13 draft spots
I can when he should have traded up and we didn't need Murray.
True. NAK? I guess then they are right back at the 50 limit.
Gets better NAK had 6 games but then was a mistake? Probably lands a 2nd at TD.
 
Your argument was that he didn't trade a 1st. Which he did
What the return is yet to be determined in few years
But he did trade his 1st

Low or high, he traded his first

I guess leafs didnt' trade their first when they picked Dermott and Bracco instead of Konency
They just traded down. I guess 13 spots doesn't mean much

Gotcha

If you bought something that cost $13 and gave the cashier $100, with $87 in change, and that product turned out to be faulty, do you say “what a waste of $100!”?

The Leafs also traded Rakell and Gibson for Tyler Biggs… I guess 13 spots doesn’t mean much
 
He did trade a first then. I mean you did trade for a 2nd rounder that's trading a first

If that's the case, nobody ever really traded the first. They just moved down 40, 50 or 60 spots down

When you trade a 1st rounder, you traded a 1st. maybe not first over, but you traded the first
Dubas said the guy we wanted got taken. Meaning 1 or 2 spots before he pulled the trigger. A good GM trades up if it's a star. I simply don't agree with Dubas throwing away picks. How is Mrazek playing cause now we could use him. If we lose first round again I want 3 firings and bringing in proven management. This has been one long experiment. How many of Dubas picks will have impact? Will he trade another first to get out of his own mess..again?
 
  • Like
Reactions: fahad203
Dubas said the guy we wanted got taken. Meaning 1 or 2 spots before he pulled the trigger. A good GM trades up if it's a star. I simply don't agree with Dubas throwing away picks. How is Mrazek playing cause now we could use him. If we lose first round again I want 3 firings and bringing in proven management. This has been one long experiment. How many of Dubas picks will have impact? Will he trade another first to get out of his own mess..again?

Don’t look now but Minten is at 2 pts/GP while being a defensive beast!
 
I have a relative who has a history of claiming to be unlucky yet would always take unnecessary risks like foregoing regular automotive maintenance, buying the cheapest model of a daily use appliance, paying bills on the last possible date, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fahad203

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad