All good. I respect the opinion for sure because I don’t disagree he is a great player. My thought is only that if you need a winger (or two), maybe there is more value in looking at wingers. Or a winger and an impactful D-Man.
Odds are pretty good there will be impactful players at all positions available and some with varying skill sets that may complement the roster better.
I’m not saying Stonehouse is available out of Ottawa but he is a more unique winger that crashes the net, yaps in everyone’s faces, pisses off the opposition, draws penalties, scores 30+ goals and is an undrafted free agent signing for Edmonton which is a rare feat. Maybe looking to add an element like that would be more important depending on whether the team has enough of that type of player.
Maybe it is more of a shut down big body winger or D-Man?
It is easy to simply target the best available player and suggest that’s the guy you need but I am trying to understand what your true needs are. Hockey elements, not specific players. IMO, you are really good down the middle. Any additions down the middle would make a marginal impact. Even moving Haight to the wing is an option but would Haight be a better winger than another player available? Who knows? Maybe.
I think Beck is a waste of assets for Saginaw Because of the roster construction on Saginaw. Would he make the team better? Yes. Without a doubt. Are there other players that could make the team jsut as good at a cheaper price? Maybe. Who would those guys potentially be? Who else interests you for this roster?
It is a discussion forum. Discuss. Don’t just shut it down like the one and only option is “X” player. That’s is far too boring!