Speculation: Sabres Roster Speculation - Pre-season 2023 Edition

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
for decades, eklund has had a reputation for blowing smoke and casting a wide net with loose generalizations. You said earlier i should ignore your eklund posts and i will moving forward, but you should be aware that any mention of eklund on HFboards is going to be met with this kind of a response. Almost always. HIs rumors can be fun to talk about, but not worth putting any stock into.

I've been posting his stuff here since 2013 and been getting the exact same responses as yours -- I'm sure you've said the same thing to me before.

Even when he just reports that teams are talking about a player, which can never be disproven, people go bonkers and can't help posting about how much they think he sucks, like anyone hasn't heard that a million times.

I'll say this about Eklund:

Bob McKenzie has given him credit for breaking a couple trades, and the two seemed to have a good relationship when Bob was more active. Eklund blows a ton of smoke, but I do think he gets wind of legit information from time to time. The problem is that it's nearly impossible to tell what's real from what's nonsense.

What evidence do you have that he's doing nothing more than making hundreds of claims until something sticks?

Because in my view, the way you get credibility as an insider is by making claims and being correct about them. And his rate is atrocious, so you must be using some other metric.
Ty Anderson (currently at 98.5 The Sports Hub in Boston, formerly at HockeyBuzz from 2010-2018) is a former student of mine. We played in the same fantasy league for a couple years while he was at HockeyBuzz, and based on what Ty has said, Eklund had zero insider sources with teams at that time. It was a big coup for Ty just to be recognized by the Bruins as a legitimate journalist and given press credentials.

Eklund's business model was to read *everything* he could find about team needs, transaction rumors, etc., and make predictions that, while not based on any hard information, were well-educated guesses. So he was completely wrong a lot, but he was right (or at least partially right) often enough that people would read his website.

I think Eklund's mistake is how he presents his predictions with too much certainty; that generates backlash when he's wrong. Tim Dierkes over at MLBTradeRumors.com had the same strategy, but he'd always couch things as "I'm hearing rumors", or "an anonymous source tells us", etc., and that generated enough traffic - without destroying his credibility - that MLBTradeRumors has become a fairly legitimate baseball news website.

Tl;dr: Eklund's just like any HFBoards power user: he reads a shitload of hockey news and makes predictions based on what he's read.
 
Last edited:
He's still on vacation. Patience.
1689388299614.png
 
Last edited:
for decades, eklund has had a reputation for blowing smoke and casting a wide net with loose generalizations. You said earlier i should ignore your eklund posts and i will moving forward, but you should be aware that any mention of eklund on HFboards is going to be met with this kind of a response. Almost always. HIs rumors can be fun to talk about, but not worth putting any stock into.
The first thing I learned posting here is that no one respects an Eklund rumor it’s not even worth discussing them.
 
He definitely got played by Adams & Co in a likely attempt to push the Vegas deal over the finish line.

‘Played’ lol.

All that rumor did was burn bridges with Calgary. It was so transparently obvious what was happening. Buffalo was desperate to get the deal done before Eichels tell all interview with Lebrun the next day.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BuffaloGooner
Given the volume of good depth UFAs still out there:


(Jones/Bear/Nemeth/Pysyk, not even including Dumba)

If Adams is hoping to extract some kind of value out of one of Lybushkin/Bryson/Joker...I'm not sure the market is there. Joker might get some play because of his age...but its not going to be a good return.
 
Hello friends, not sure this is the correct spot or not. But curious, what is the projection for Krebs next season and how do you see his usage?
It will depend on how Granato sees the lineup. I think it will happen in two ways.

Granato has the option of starting Krebs on a secondary scoring line with Cozens and Peterka adding a further quality role player for that line as that line will be missing Quinn (due to injury/surgery). I think this would be my preferred option, as I fear the other option of Oloffson playing in this spot could happen.

Or, Krebs will be kept on a line he played on for a good portion of the year as he will run with Okposo and Girgensons.

With Buffalo running back the same forward core, I can see Krebs having the same usage and role to begin the year. Then, if things don’t work out I can see tweaks.
 
He's called plenty over the years -- if you don't read him, how do you even know? He's wrong a lot, but so is Kevin Weekes.

He just reports on which teams are talking but he usually doesn't have many details. He's been consistently reporting on Calgary and Buffalo talking for a while now, and others have too.
In the past eklund seemed to have some connections in Philadelphia and a few other places.

given his accuracy rate a broken clock is more accurate.

I understand Hanifin went through USA development but he doesn’t fit what Buffalo needs and he is going to ask fir too much as a UFA.

a RD just makes more sense if they are targeting something.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad