blahblah
Registered User
- Nov 24, 2005
- 21,327
- 972
Here's my take on the bridge deal. I know they are looking at Stepan and Duchene. Ultimately Duchene had a sub-par year going into his bridge deal and Stepan isn't a goal scorer. Low 20's is really where he'll seem to be most years as a peak. He couldn't sustain that 16.7% rate.
Assuming Johansen can keep up 3 shots a game he's a 25-35 goal scorer, depending on where he can sustain his shot percentage.
From what I can see here Stepan is the best comparable based on that lock out shortened season. Johansen didn't have the career that Stepan had to that point and, pro-rated, Stepan had a similar season going into the bridge deal. With Stepan taking a step back on the goal scoring front; I can see the arguments on both sides.
Frankly, I think Johansen has earned more than what is considered the current ceiling on bridge deals. However, I don't think it's anywhere near the dollars that they are seeking. Personally I think we are in that 4-4.5 range. The precedent would be a 30 goal breakout season. I don't think that would make an immediate impact on future bridge deals as most teams just give those players 6 year deals anyway.
The issue here is that his agent want to get him payed like a veteran. He's said that more than one time. He's looking for the dollars that are standard in a UFA deal where the player has more history and is in a bidding war with other teams. That is a bit of an irrational stance on the agents side.
Assuming Johansen can keep up 3 shots a game he's a 25-35 goal scorer, depending on where he can sustain his shot percentage.
From what I can see here Stepan is the best comparable based on that lock out shortened season. Johansen didn't have the career that Stepan had to that point and, pro-rated, Stepan had a similar season going into the bridge deal. With Stepan taking a step back on the goal scoring front; I can see the arguments on both sides.
Frankly, I think Johansen has earned more than what is considered the current ceiling on bridge deals. However, I don't think it's anywhere near the dollars that they are seeking. Personally I think we are in that 4-4.5 range. The precedent would be a 30 goal breakout season. I don't think that would make an immediate impact on future bridge deals as most teams just give those players 6 year deals anyway.
The issue here is that his agent want to get him payed like a veteran. He's said that more than one time. He's looking for the dollars that are standard in a UFA deal where the player has more history and is in a bidding war with other teams. That is a bit of an irrational stance on the agents side.