hockey20000
Registered User
- Dec 23, 2018
- 4,897
- 2,913
And only like 90 slots too highThe man was drafted like 90 days ago people.
I see Ottawa fans are very insecure about their team's selections .
Stanley cup finalists also tend to pick Kotkaniemi’s at 3rd overall when Tkachuk’s are the obvious pickStanley Cup finalists don't tend to have strong young cores while teams who finish bottom 3 in 3 out of 4 seasons tend to. Has nothing to do with drafting or management. I agree with you that the Sens are great drafters outside the 1st round, but in the 1st round they're pretty average if not below average. I don't think they've drafted an elite player yet unless Sanderson turns into one. So in my book the Sens and the Habs aren't that far from each other yet.
Do you really wanna talk about insecurities? Who's the player the Habs drafted? You got nothing to comment about.I see Ottawa fans are very insecure about their team's selections .
Do you really wanna talk about insecurities? Who's the player the Habs drafted? You got nothing to comment about.
lmao Mailloux is a much better prospect than Boucher and you know it.
Yikes! I know you are a Habs fan and you have to say good things about their players. But Yikes! I guess you fully support what he did to that women. Let's cheer on shitty men and support them!!!!lmao Mailloux is a much better prospect than Boucher and you know it.
You can do this excursive with basically any team in the league5 years of reconstruction is starting to do a lot.
By wasting Byram, Heinola and Sillinger, Ottawa has lost 2-3 years of reconstruction.
Huh? The Sens are one of the best drafting teams in the league in past years while Montreal is one of the worst. You should be more concerned about your own teamI see Ottawa fans are very insecure about their team's selections .
The troll is Melnyk and his gang. They are the ones making stupid decisions like giving Matt Duchene an unprotected 1st round and not signing Duchene 1 year later or selecting players who have had injury issues and haven't played competitively.
A stingy owner who spends as little money as possible and a badly placed arena which explains the very low attendance, one of the worst in the league.
I am sorry to see Ottawa in such a situation. Truly.
But to show my respect, I will never criticize anything about Ottawa again and when the right choices are made, I will say so.
Anyway I have made the tour of my current opinion. Many share it.
its still really earlyBoucher: 6’1”, 205, 2P in 12 NCAA GP
Sillinger: 6’0”, 190, 8P in 13 NHL GP
Just a classic case of a team outsmarting itself.
Boucher: 6’1”, 205, 2P in 12 NCAA GP
Sillinger: 6’0”, 190, 8P in 13 NHL GP
Just a classic case of a team outsmarting itself.
I don’t know, man. He was a surprise top-10 pick and it seems pretty relevant to compare his poor performance so far (again, he was a top-10 pick, not some mid-rounder you could be happy with working hard in a team’s bottom-6 and “impacting the game in more ways than scoring”) to that of the consensus guy.No reason to dump on Boucher to compliment Sillinger.
Boucher played very little last season after being injured for most of the season, so there’s an adjustment period with that.
And then there’s also that the team sucks, but has a lot of older forwards that are good enough that they demand playing time. Boucher is not a fixture in the top six. I’m pretty sure he’s been mostly in the bottom six, and probably very little PP time.
He’s also a player that impacts the game in more ways than scoring, so only using raw totals is a bad way to measure his impact.
He’s probably not going to justify being the 10th pick, but I think he’ll still have a good career eventually. He wasn’t ever likely to be much less than a two year player and more likely a three year player. Check back at the end of the season to see if he starts elevating himself into next season. Most freshman struggle early on in college hockey. It’s a higher level of hockey than they’ve ever played. This is nothing new.
Can everyone please keep this thread about Boucher? If people want to talk about the Senators drafting strategies, there are other places to talk about that.
I don’t know, man. He was a surprise top-10 pick and it seems pretty relevant to compare his poor performance so far (again, he was a top-10 pick, not some mid-rounder you could be happy with working hard in a team’s bottom-6 and “impacting the game in more ways than scoring”) to that of the consensus guy.
I mean the good thing is that the Sens don’t really need him to be a top-6 winger with how young and promising their current forward corps is. But on the other hand…you still want full value out of a top-10 pick, and with Pinto’s unfortunate injury I am just imagining:For once, I agree with you.
It's still very early but had the Senators drafted Sillinger, he'd be on their roster right now. Boucher is a stretch to be on the roster in 3 years, let alone now.
No reason to dump on Boucher to compliment Sillinger.
Boucher played very little last season after being injured for most of the season, so there’s an adjustment period with that.
And then there’s also that the team sucks, but has a lot of older forwards that are good enough that they demand playing time. Boucher is not a fixture in the top six. I’m pretty sure he’s been mostly in the bottom six, and probably very little PP time.
He’s also a player that impacts the game in more ways than scoring, so only using raw totals is a bad way to measure his impact.
He’s probably not going to justify being the 10th pick, but I think he’ll still have a good career eventually. He wasn’t ever likely to be much less than a two year player and more likely a three year player. Check back at the end of the season to see if he starts elevating himself into next season. Most freshman struggle early on in college hockey. It’s a higher level of hockey than they’ve ever played. This is nothing new.
Can everyone please keep this thread about Boucher? If people want to talk about the Senators drafting strategies, there are other places to talk about that.
I don’t know, man. He was a surprise top-10 pick and it seems pretty relevant to compare his poor performance so far (again, he was a top-10 pick, not some mid-rounder you could be happy with working hard in a team’s bottom-6 and “impacting the game in more ways than scoring”) to that of the consensus guy.