Circulartheory
Registered User
I hear you but the only reason that they were able to get away with this is they came up in a time when combine results weren't public knowledge. Briere is absolutely tiny, it is plain as day that he is under 5'10"........
P.S. the arguement is already won.......he just doesn't know it yet. To call Grimaldi a longshot is nothing short of asinine. If he said that Grimaldi isn't a sure bet I could accept that but a longshot???
I am quite open minded and will accept anyone that says Grimaldi is a longshot, but with the proper reasoning. Making an argument based on JUST height, is not a legitimate argument IMO.
However, if one said that his lack of size causes him to be weak along the boards, unable to create plays, and to make constant giveaways to bigger opponents, that I will accept 100%.
I have however not seen any argument of the sort. All I have read so far is "5-5? No way!"
Because I tell you, even a 6-5 guy can be weak along the boards and unable to create plays. Being 5-5 makes it harder to do those things, but players like Marchand and Tootoo have proven that height does not mean one cannot train to be physical and agitating. This is the reason I keep asking him for a scouting report from his own eyes. I want to know what this poster seems to know.