RW Matvei Michkov (2023, 7th, PHI) Part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.

ello

Registered User
Jun 12, 2018
1,113
1,417
I find it so funny that the new "crosby and ovechkin" russian/canadian superstars in Bedard and Michkov and both undersized around 5'10 and not particularly fast.

A lot of the concerns that people had about Bedard seem to apply to Michkov and likewise I think Michkov's talent will supersede the physical limitations.

Personally I do still think Bedard is half a tier above Michkov as of right now, putting a slightly better PPG in a much better league. Michkov could certainly close that gap in a couple of years tho. Cant wait to watch him play in the NHL
 

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
59,844
26,542
New York
I find it so funny that the new "crosby and ovechkin" russian/canadian superstars in Bedard and Michkov and both undersized around 5'10 and not particularly fast.

A lot of the concerns that people had about Bedard seem to apply to Michkov and likewise I think Michkov's talent will supersede the physical limitations.

Personally I do still think Bedard is half a tier above Michkov as of right now, putting a slightly better PPG in a much better league. Michkov could certainly close that gap in a couple of years tho. Cant wait to watch him play in the NHL
Keep in mind the NHL is a lot higher scoring of a league. Michkov is a lot higher up the league charts in scoring per game.
 

FlyguyOX

Registered User
Jun 29, 2018
4,304
4,282
I find it so funny that the new "crosby and ovechkin" russian/canadian superstars in Bedard and Michkov and both undersized around 5'10 and not particularly fast.

A lot of the concerns that people had about Bedard seem to apply to Michkov and likewise I think Michkov's talent will supersede the physical limitations.

Personally I do still think Bedard is half a tier above Michkov as of right now, putting a slightly better PPG in a much better league. Michkov could certainly close that gap in a couple of years tho. Cant wait to watch him play in the NHL
Different positions, so size concern is bigger for a center than wing
 

Nabrules

Registered User
Nov 5, 2018
1,598
1,668
KHL season is over for Michkov.

41 points in 48 games (one being a write off with SKA) and a PPG of 0.85. Nice progression from his 0.67 PPG last year.

Had pneumonia and it’s correlating symptoms for the last 3 months of the year too. All in all really good season for MM.

Expect him to break the PPG barrier next season and continue to improve in all other aspects of the game!
 

Redpath

Registered User
Sep 30, 2011
3,425
5,302
KHL season is over for Michkov.

41 points in 48 games (one being a write off with SKA) and a PPG of 0.85. Nice progression from his 0.67 PPG last year.

Had pneumonia and it’s correlating symptoms for the last 3 months of the year too. All in all really good season for MM.

Expect him to break the PPG barrier next season and continue to improve in all other aspects of the game!

Hopefully Rotenberg tries him at center again, too.

A PPG season at center on a top KHL team will send his stock sky high.
 

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
59,844
26,542
New York
Is SKA going to bring him back and let him be one of their most important players?

I would think beating their whole team in PPG would cause them to realize he has more than earned that chance.

I think by the end of next season he can be the best player in the KHL. This year, he didn't get there, but became one of the best players in the league. Next year I think he can be the best.
 

Boonk

Registered User
Oct 10, 2017
2,927
3,957
Really good D+1 year. I expect that he becomes a top line player on SKA next season if they know whats good for them over there.
 

LetsGoFlyers12

Registered User
Jan 19, 2017
109
111
Best PPG for a Russian prospects in professional hockey history during a D+1 season. 41 pts in 48 games (0.85 ppg). Unequivocally a big success and positive development. Next stop is getting top 6 and PP time with SKA next season.

Considering he only played 17 mins a game and PP2 with Sochi, I don't see why his chances would be much less with SKA next season. If placed on SKA this season, he would rank 1 in points per game, goals per game and shots per game, while playing 4th most among forwards.
 
Nov 9, 2022
235
407
Saw Grant McCagg on Twitter earlier this weekend discrediting Michkov's season because of the 'lack of talent' in the KHL. It's incredible that people actually pay money for his prospect analysis.

Michkov looks unreal.
These lower tier analyst gas bags love the "mUh rUssiA bAd!" take for clicks and views for some reason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FlyguyOX

Kshahdoo

Registered User
Mar 23, 2008
20,353
10,054
Moscow, Russia
Couldn't beat Kuznetsov for the best ever U20 KHL season, both stay with 41 points. Michkov played one fewer game, though (actually two fewer games), and he did it in his D+1 season not D+2 one. Or if you you don't like this D+ shit, he is 6 months younger than Kuz was.
 

Garl

Registered User
Oct 7, 2006
8,144
1,085
He has inarguably been the best teenager in the KHL era, and possibly the best in the RSL era as well. Next year will be a big test for him
No. Why do some people need to add this unnecessary and undeserved titles to Michkov's season?
How is this season better than Kuznetsov in 2011-12? How is it better than Malkin in 2005-06?
 

Garl

Registered User
Oct 7, 2006
8,144
1,085
Couldn't beat Kuznetsov for the best ever U20 KHL season, both stay with 41 points. Michkov played one fewer game, though (actually two fewer games), and he did it in his D+1 season not D+2 one. Or if you you don't like this D+ shit, he is 6 months younger than Kuz was
Best ever is Kaprizov with 42
 

Garl

Registered User
Oct 7, 2006
8,144
1,085
Best PPG for a Russian prospects in professional hockey history during a D+1 season. 41 pts in 48 games (0.85 ppg). Unequivocally a big success and positive development. Next stop is getting top 6 and PP time with SKA next season.

Considering he only played 17 mins a game and PP2 with Sochi, I don't see why his chances would be much less with SKA next season. If placed on SKA this season, he would rank 1 in points per game, goals per game and shots per game, while playing 4th most among forwards.
This is at least correct, even though this D+1 or D+2 business heavily favours late birth players.

The "if placed" thing is meaningless though, this doesnt work like that in KHL

Is SKA going to bring him back and let him be one of their most important players?

I would think beating their whole team in PPG would cause them to realize he has more than earned that chance.

I think by the end of next season he can be the best player in the KHL. This year, he didn't get there, but became one of the best players in the league. Next year I think he can be the best.
Should they bring back Gusev and Tkachyov ASAP? Look at PPG!
 

Garl

Registered User
Oct 7, 2006
8,144
1,085
My overall rank of his season:

SKA- failed to make the team, despite the designated junior status.

Sochi-0,85 PPG and 19 goals in 41 game is very good for a player if his age. For the level of hype that he has it is underwhelming though

Asa player, whenever I saw him, he was invisible. However, he has really good stats. Unique player, unique hockey IQ.
But is not very good in other aspects of game aside from goalscoring/offense creating. I think, I can understand, why he did not make SKA roster. I also don't think Rotenberg knows what to do with this type of player, he prefers run and shoot types.

Overall rank, B+ for the season. Not an A, because expectations are "new Ovechkin/Malkin"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Musampa

Kshahdoo

Registered User
Mar 23, 2008
20,353
10,054
Moscow, Russia
He is not a center, forget about it

We shall see...

My overall rank of his season:

SKA- failed to make the team, despite the designated junior status.

Sochi-0,85 PPG and 19 goals in 41 game is very good for a player if his age. For the level of hype that he has it is underwhelming though

Asa player, whenever I saw him, he was invisible. However, he has really good stats. Unique player, unique hockey IQ.
But is not very good in other aspects of game aside from goalscoring/offense creating. I think, I can understand, why he did not make SKA roster. I also don't think Rotenberg knows what to do with this type of player, he prefers run and shoot types.

Overall rank, B+ for the season. Not an A, because expectations are "new Ovechkin/Malkin"

Btw how is Carlsson doing? To me he doesn't look that great, 0 goals in the last 22 games sucks...
 

Garl

Registered User
Oct 7, 2006
8,144
1,085
KHL season is over for Michkov.

41 points in 48 games (one being a write off with SKA) and a PPG of 0.85. Nice progression from his 0.67 PPG last year.

Had pneumonia and it’s correlating symptoms for the last 3 months of the year too. All in all really good season for MM.

Expect him to break the PPG barrier next season and continue to improve in all other aspects of the game!
PPG heavily depends on where he plays.

Btw how is Carlsson doing? To me he doesn't look that great, 0 goals in the last 22 games sucks...
There is a thread about Carlsson, or you can create one on the main board

We shall see...
LoL
 

Draft

Registered User
Jan 23, 2013
8,589
5,427
Saw Grant McCagg on Twitter earlier this weekend discrediting Michkov's season because of the 'lack of talent' in the KHL. It's incredible that people actually pay money for his prospect analysis.

Michkov looks unreal.
I’m far from a fan of Grant, but he’s not wrong in this instance. The quality of the league is a long ways from what it was even five years ago and that does play a factor in contextualizing Michkov’s stats. It’s one thing to be talking about his PPG rate being similar to guys like Jagr/Radulov/Morozov/Moyzyakin/Yashin/etc. in a given year - it’s another to be trailing top KHL players like Leivo and Weal that are nowhere near NHL quality at this stage of their careers and would be second rate KHL players in previous years.

Michkov’s an elite, exciting prospect and I still like following him after investing a lot of time in his draft year… but there’s no sense in ignoring important and fairly objective/measurable context just because Grant was the person that said it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad