RW Matvei Michkov (2023, 7th, PHI) Part 4
- Thread starter GermanSpitfire
- Start date
- Status
Fair enough. I can't argue with the pick. He's a great foundation piece to build with.
tnfrs
Registered User
- Jul 19, 2023
- 1,191
- 1,010
is this your voice cracking
Of course, I am defeated
Ps A reminder that my beef was not with Michkov but with his groupies who said ridiculous things like "Michkov is the best player in KHL", "best season ever", "best player on SKA" etc
Michkov himself us a talented young man with long road ahead
Gregor Samsa
Registered User
- Sep 5, 2020
- 4,274
- 4,866
Yeah, I think 3 years actually works out best for the Flyers as it gives them a chance to trawl the bottom for 2-3 years. When Michkov comes over, the Flyers should have a decent amount of talent (or at least potential) on paper. They should be bad for the 2-3 years with high draft picks. If the Flyers don’t get Celebrini or Eiserman in the upcoming draft, I’d love to draft a potential bonafide 1D. Michkov should hit the ground running in the NHL, and by that time the Flyers should be on the upswing and looking to make noise. I’m optimistic about the team in 4-5 years
Zephyr666
Registered User
- Apr 17, 2013
- 294
- 7
The guy at the end of his KHL Contract will have to decide to either :
1) Sign a 3 year NHL ELC
2) Sign a 1 year KHL contract (at bigger money than the ELC) and be eligible next year to sign a 2 year ELC
3) Sign another 3 year KHL contract (at bigger money than the ELC) and be eligible to sign a 1 year ELC
I think he choose number 2) and come here after 4 years. I hope for Flyers fan he does not go 3)
1) Sign a 3 year NHL ELC
2) Sign a 1 year KHL contract (at bigger money than the ELC) and be eligible next year to sign a 2 year ELC
3) Sign another 3 year KHL contract (at bigger money than the ELC) and be eligible to sign a 1 year ELC
I think he choose number 2) and come here after 4 years. I hope for Flyers fan he does not go 3)
AhosDatsyukian
Registered User
- Sep 25, 2020
- 11,510
- 33,697
lol good luck with that, not gonna happen especially with the Fedotov situation
Mrb1p
PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
I mean, he sure does look like the best player on SkA hes 5th in ppg right now in the Khl.
Fedotov situation makes it more likely. NHL doesn't have to agree to handshake agreement with KHL now.
AhosDatsyukian
Registered User
- Sep 25, 2020
- 11,510
- 33,697
KHL may be willing to go against IIHF with their current ban anyways but NHL won't, not to mention the uglier this gets the more likely Russia plays dirty with a kid like Michkov/his family like they did with Fedotov and Panarin even.
Mrb1p
PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
He has 1.25 ppg, hes literally 5th and he is definitely the best player with Nikishin. Who are you Roman himself?
He has 5 pts in 6 games, talk about ppg is meaningless this early but you are factually wrong here
And he has to prove he is better than established vets, otherwise, would have been on the team
I am Roman lmao, you sure got me
Czechboy
Češi do toho!
- Apr 15, 2018
- 27,501
- 24,749
This happened last year on the thread too. Posters remove games he didn't get points and only count the ones he does get points in. His SKA games last year were also not used by some because 'coach is an idiot' or 'he didn't play enough'. So even .ppg is up for debate on HFboards.hahaHe has 5 pts in 6 games, talk about ppg is meaningless this early but you are factually wrong here
And he has to prove he is better than established vets, otherwise, would have been on the team
I am Roman lmao, you sure got me
Ftr.. he's doing awesome and if he does get a .ppg this year it would be exceptional.
Mrb1p
PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Disingenuously counting the game where he played 6 minutes? Sounds like you have absolutely nothing against Michkov lol.He has 5 pts in 6 games, talk about ppg is meaningless this early but you are factually wrong here
And he has to prove he is better than established vets, otherwise, would have been on the team
I am Roman lmao, you sure got me
I am just stating a fact, if you dont want to use that game state your specific time period, or stay away from the "hes got that great PPG" line. Still only 1,0 btw
Ps had he scored in that game you would be using it right? Lol
Given that the poster is ranking vs other players, you’d have to back out every game other players also play a given amount and then rank. Which they didn’t do.
Beukeboom Fan
Registered User
There is obviously context required when the coach is a political appointee who should not be in charge of a Mite team, With that said - I think it's more disengenous to exclude a game where he actually played than count a game when he did actually play 6 minutes. If he scored in a game getting 6 minutes of icetime would you also exclude the game from the analysis?
If you have a weird situation like this, you can you P/60 or a similar metric to take into account the icetime. That's a lot more relevent than to arbitrarily cherry pick data to build a case around.
The best way to do it would be to do something like basketball-reference does with their per 36 and normalizes all stats based on 36 minutes of play.
What a play! Tyanulin to Michkov to Rasskazov to goal!
Last edited:
montreal
Go Habs Go
Mixed it up after the whistle, thought he was going to drop the gloves there.
LeafChief
Matthew Knies Enthusiast
Genuinely strange to see so many people cheering against this kid in this thread. Looks like now that he's getting playing time with Sochi, he's showing why he should have been picked in the top 5.
- Status
