BusQuets
Registered User
- Jul 16, 2010
- 12,059
- 3,033
An upgrade of Jack Skille.
This. I think it was Button who made this comparison first. Jack Skille with better sense of humor if i remember correctly.
An upgrade of Jack Skille.
One thing to consider is how dynamic Pulju is, more than Laine. His shot doesn't have to be as good.
I hear this term tossed around here or there describing players but I am not certain of what it means in terms of a hockey player. I know what the word dynamic means but not sure how it applies to say Pulju, does he progress the game of hockey in a way? I mean McDavid is a player I'd label as dynamic, he truly pushes the boundaries of what a hockey player can do. Are you maybe just using the word to say that Pulju's game has more facets to it? If so I don't believe his game more faceted than Laine's, just a different style of play.
Keep dreaming
or Marcel Hossa
Pulju's style of play is different, by dynamic I mean skating power, versatility. He is better at generating assists. I don't think Pulju is better, just different. Now many seem to think that you need an A+ shot to be a top prospect.I hear this term tossed around here or there describing players but I am not certain of what it means in terms of a hockey player. I know what the word dynamic means but not sure how it applies to say Pulju, does he progress the game of hockey in a way? I mean McDavid is a player I'd label as dynamic, he truly pushes the boundaries of what a hockey player can do. Are you maybe just using the word to say that Pulju's game has more facets to it? If so I don't believe his game more faceted than Laine's, just a different style of play.
Pulju's style of play is different, by dynamic I mean skating power, versatility. He is better at generating assists. I don't think Pulju is better, just different. Now many seem to think that you need an A+ shot to be a top prospect.
Laine being so phenomenally good and having adapted surprisingly fast for a European raised player is what kind of makes Pulju seem less good because they're compared so directly and Pulju has more to figure out.
Oilers got lucky in getting him. He just needs a little seasoning like Draisaitl did.
Any video of his goal?
AHL or NHL at this point of time doesn't matter that much. But if he isn't on the starting line up when the Oilers play the first game next season, I'm going to worry.
That shot is filthy. I see a bit of Ovechkin in his game
His goal at 2:50 (saw this in his thread in the oilers forum)
Would you trade pulju for josi ?
Another goal, 2+3 in 5 games.
1 timer from the left side.
Has drawn 2-3 penalties tonight, looks tough to stop near boards.
Best player on the team, he can take over shifts.
Keep in mind that guys who make those comments have probably watched those games where he was dominant. I don't see how much more effectively he could play without being a clear choice for NHL. He has his weaknesses still but I think yesterday alone there were like 3 breakaway chances for him, countless takeaways and did he draw like 2 or 3 penalties?So I certainly didn't see the entire game but the replay shows that he scores a meaningless power play goal in a 6-3 loss and somehow he's taking over shifts. He's also been a minus player in 3 of the games he has played. I believe he's going to be a good player but the hype over this guy is beyond amazing.
So I certainly didn't see the entire game but the replay shows that he scores a meaningless power play goal in a 6-3 loss and somehow he's taking over shifts. He's also been a minus player in 3 of the games he has played. I believe he's going to be a good player but the hype over this guy is beyond amazing.