RW Brock Boeser - North Dakota, NCAA (2015, 23rd, VAN) II

I'm surprised people talk about Linden, Luongo, Bure or even Burrows getting their number retired.

* Linden had a very solid career, but nothing exceptional. He didn't play his whole career in Vancouver also.
* Bure spent 428 games as a Canucks, barely more than half of his career. That's equivalent to only 5 full seasons.
* More or less the same for Luongo, who actually spent more time as a Panther than as a Canuck already.
* Burrows has no argument to be in this discussion.

To be retired, you should have both a very high level and longevity *with the team* IMO. Having only one of those should not be enough.

Under those criteria, only the Sedins really deserve to have their number retired.
 
I'm surprised people talk about Linden, Luongo, Bure or even Burrows getting their number retired.

* Linden had a very solid career, but nothing exceptional. He didn't play his whole career in Vancouver also.
* Bure spent 428 games as a Canucks, barely more than half of his career. That's equivalent to only 5 full seasons.
* More or less the same for Luongo, who actually spent more time as a Panther than as a Canuck already.
* Burrows has no argument to be in this discussion.

To be retired, you should have both a very high level and longevity *with the team* IMO. Having only one of those should not be enough.

Under those criteria, only the Sedins really deserve to have their number retired.
Pavel Bure had an overnight effect on the fanbase, as it saw exponential growth during his time with the team. He changed the entire culture of hockey in Vancouver and was as significant a hockey icon as any in the city.

The impact that he had was that of a rock star. Canucks sweaters were flying off of shelves in other markets because of this player; people waited hours for his autograph.

His on-ice achievements far surpassed any that had ever been witnessed before from a player in a Canucks sweater. He made the games worth watching a la Connor McDavid, but to an even greater degree due to his fearlessness and thus his flair for making dazzling plays and scoring highlight-reel goals without any regard for the context of the game -- there was a chance that he could score any time he touched the puck from any zone, whether it was coming out of his own end with it or taking it to the net from the deep corners of the offensive zone.

He is the most culturally-significant player in team history, and he still is the best individual on-ice performer in its history, with all due respect to the Sedin brothers.

There was only one Pavel Bure, and his linemates were always substandard after his rookie campaign. After returning from a groin injury at the start of 1993-94, for example, he scored scored 49 goals, 78 points in the final 51 games on a line with a rotation of Gino Odjick, Murray Craven, Jimmy Carson, Greg Adams, etc. He scored 30% of the team's goals and contributed to 46% of the team's offense during that period to lift them into that year's playoffs, where he went on to score 16 goals in 24 games, including 13 goals over a stretch of 12 games between the Flames, Stars, and Leafs series. The next season, he dominated the first-round series against St. Louis with 7 goals, 12 points in 7 games. He is a Hockey Hall of Fame inductee, with the majority of his NHL career having been spent in Vancouver.

He wasn't a Canuck for very long, but those years were special for the team and its fans. Part of the reason why the Canucks fanbase is its current size is because of Pavel Bure. He expedited the popularization of the team in a market where a lot of hockey fans were once Leafs or Canadiens fans. Hockey was a niche sport in Vancouver until Pavel Bure came along.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pavel Bure had an overnight effect on the fanbase, as it saw exponential growth during his time with the team. He changed the entire culture of hockey in Vancouver and was as significant a hockey icon as any in the city.

I can see an argument for Bure, so fine.

It was a different time though. Hard to compare past performances with the one the Sedins are pulling for instance, but whatever. To me the lack of longevity make this case to be very arguable, but it's true that Bure had a strong influence in Vancouver, so I can see where you're coming from.
 
Toe Blake wore 6. Won a hart, led the league in points
Ralph Backstrom wore 6; 6 all star games
Russ Courtnall wore 6 with the Habs
 
I'm surprised people talk about Linden, Luongo, Bure or even Burrows getting their number retired.

* Linden had a very solid career, but nothing exceptional. He didn't play his whole career in Vancouver also.
* Bure spent 428 games as a Canucks, barely more than half of his career. That's equivalent to only 5 full seasons.
* More or less the same for Luongo, who actually spent more time as a Panther than as a Canuck already.
* Burrows has no argument to be in this discussion.

To be retired, you should have both a very high level and longevity *with the team* IMO. Having only one of those should not be enough.

Under those criteria, only the Sedins really deserve to have their number retired.

I agree with this post 100%!!!! The bar has been set way too low in Vancouver in regards to retired numbers!! The Sedins should be the ONLY players with their numbers retired in Vancouver!!

BACK TO BROCK BOESER

I am very happy to see him take number 6!:)
In my opinion, it be nice if other players like Stecher, Tryamkin and Goldobin would follow Brock Boeser's lead and trade in those goofy football numbers for some real hockey numbers like 2, 3, 7, 11 or 13 at the beginning of next year.
 
Boeser shouldn't wear #6.


It reminds me of Yannick Weber...

It reminds me of Dennis Kearns. Yes, I'm aging myself but he still holds the record for assists in a season by a Canucks defencemen so better to think of Kearns than Weber.
 
I like what the Canucks did. Yeah, they may have burnt a year off of his ELC, but on the other hand, they now have a fantastic relationship with one of their supposed future star-in-the-making. Hopefully, Brock will be a loyal Canuck when he makes his future decisions.
 
I like what the Canucks did. Yeah, they may have burnt a year off of his ELC, but on the other hand, they now have a fantastic relationship with one of their supposed future star-in-the-making. Hopefully, Brock will be a loyal Canuck when he makes his future decisions.

It was also important to Boeser to help his family out financially as his dad can't work anymore due to Parkinson's disease.
 
So what do we see this guy ending up as? What's his ceiling?

Will he be better than Horvat?

Blake Wheeler is a fair comparison for upside IMO. Maybe Pacioretty.

I think he'll score more goals than Horvat, but Horvat will be the more complete player and probably put up more points.
 
Blake Wheeler is a fair comparison for upside IMO. Maybe Pacioretty.

I think he'll score more goals than Horvat, but Horvat will be the more complete player and probably put up more points.
I don't see Wheeler at all. Wheeler is much bigger and a way better skater.

His upside is a 1st line sniping winger with physicality but not the greatest skating. Out of current NHLers, James Neal is probably closer than either Patches or Wheeler. Maybe he blows it out of the water and hits Perry like ceiling, but out of physical but not great skaters sniping wingers, I'd say it is more likely in Neal territory than Perry.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad