I'm not sure how those rankings are weighted, but are they comparing Rutger at D+2 vs Yager at D+1?
If we were truly evaluating the two, we'd have to evaluate Yager now vs Rutger from a year ago
Rutger was PPG player in his D+1 year vs tougher competition that'll Yager, who was 1.66 PPG in his D+1 season
I think it's logical for Rutger to be rated a bit higher as he has an additional year of development under him. Imo both have tracked similarly at the same stages of development.