Often times, you read only half the post so you don't understand what was being said. I quoted an ESPN documentary in which a number of guys from the Soviet era were interviewed on camera, including Tretiak, Petrov, Mikhailov, Yakushev, Fetisov, Kasatonov, Makarov, Larionov, and several Soviet era journalists, including Vsevolod Kukushkin. All of them spoke negatively about Tikhonov as a human being, and painted a negative contrast with Tarasov. At the same time, they praised Tikhonov as an innovator who used advanced techniques to improve Soviet hockey. I thought Tikhonov was one of the greatest coaches of all time in hockey, but over time, his players became exhausted with his methods and stop trying to excel and basically quit on him. That is a coach's fault. The coach is supposed to find ways to motivate the team. If he cannot, then he must be replaced!
Chernyshev was truly a great coach and deserves credit for helping to create Soviet hockey, but I completely reject the claim that he was the "REAL" founder of Soviet hockey. He was a quiet guy who sat in the background in his knit cap while the forceful personality of Tarasov built a great machine!