Proposal: Rumours & Proposals Thread | Trade Cloned, Keep Soli | STAY AWAY CHIA

Which side?


  • Total voters
    88
Status
Not open for further replies.

Hemsky4pm2

Registered User
Dec 2, 2017
916
714
There was absolutely some concern about his playing ability as he got older. There's a reason guys his age generally don't get 7 year deals.

Chia: "That's the price you have to pay."
Logic and Reason: "Then don't pay the price!!!"
 

Little Fury

Registered User
Jun 21, 2006
18,137
7,442
I mean, it just is. You’re actually going to try and pretend like people say powerforwards just suddenly stop scoring for no particular reason as they age? Everyone says it’s because of the play style, which leads to injuries, and a decline. That simply didn’t happen with Lucic.

Everyone's scoring declines as they age. I expect players who are slow or less skilled see declines faster than those who don't rely on speed or physicality, but possess sound fundamental skills. Lucic isn't fast enough to keep up with the play and isn't skilled enough to work around those limitations the way a guy like Joe Thornton can.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aerrol

bertty

Registered User
Jun 6, 2017
453
118
It is not like all Chia trades are bad in terms of value or risk/reward possibility but they are bad in context. As an example I bring Reinhart trade. Yeah we give up a lot but he was potential top pair D-man but we have Klefbom Nurse Davidson Ference Nikitin Hunt and Oestrele on left side with singing Sekera that summer. There were definitly no need to bring another LHD.
 

Little Fury

Registered User
Jun 21, 2006
18,137
7,442
It is not like all Chia trades are bad in terms of value or risk/reward possibility but they are bad in context. As an example I bring Reinhart trade. Yeah we give up a lot but he was potential top pair D-man but we have Klefbom Nurse Davidson Ference Nikitin Hunt and Oestrele on left side with singing Sekera that summer. There were definitly no need to bring another LHD.

He wasn't though?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jamin

Paralyzer

Oilers Win Cup in 2025
Sep 29, 2006
15,984
8,428
Somewhere Up North
It is not like all Chia trades are bad in terms of value or risk/reward possibility but they are bad in context. As an example I bring Reinhart trade. Yeah we give up a lot but he was potential top pair D-man but we have Klefbom Nurse Davidson Ference Nikitin Hunt and Oestrele on left side with singing Sekera that summer. There were definitly no need to bring another LHD.

Yeah, that I can understand. I gotta say though, the last few trades he has done I'm scratching my head at. No idea what he has been thinking.
 

Jarvi

Registered User
Mar 22, 2012
554
372
It is not like all Chia trades are bad in terms of value or risk/reward possibility but they are bad in context. As an example I bring Reinhart trade. Yeah we give up a lot but he was potential top pair D-man but we have Klefbom Nurse Davidson Ference Nikitin Hunt and Oestrele on left side with singing Sekera that summer. There were definitly no need to bring another LHD.
Nearly all of his moves look bad in a vacuum, just looking at what was given/recieved. They look worse when you dig deeper, much like you said.

I just saw this last night, which may have been posted before but I wasn't aware of. Just shows that he doesn't have a clue whatsoever.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Aerrol

space321

Registered User
May 11, 2011
6,075
1,899
As much as people love to crap on him, he does some decent deals, even though people don't seem to understand it. I mean, I remember people were good with Kassian at 1.9M for 3 years and said that would be a steal, but because he hasn't played a whole lot, people crap on Chia for signing him to that. Majority of the time, these deals looked good at some point in time, but it's up to the players to play to it's potential. Personally, the WORST signing I've seen in the last 6 years would have to be the Nikitin signing. THAT one was ridiculous.

How in the world is the nikitin deal the worst?? It was only TWO YEARS.
 

Paralyzer

Oilers Win Cup in 2025
Sep 29, 2006
15,984
8,428
Somewhere Up North
How in the world is the nikitin deal the worst?? It was only TWO YEARS.

Because it made 0 sense and Nikitin was not a Top 4 Dman which we desperately needed back then. You can't tell me Lucic was not a Top 6 forward when we signed him. He was supposed to play Top 6 minutes. Nikitin from his past was a top 6-8 defenceman at best. In terms of money, Nikitin was worse.
 

Crude

Rafters 94
Jul 15, 2007
488
193
Edmonton
One thing that is driving me nuts about the Koskinen signing is the timing. It's a signal to the entire league that we HAVE to move Talbot now, or lose him for nothing, bringing down his already low value.
 
  • Like
Reactions: the mcdavid era

Sanchez

Registered User
Jan 18, 2006
18,053
28,177
Nearly all of his moves look bad in a vacuum, just looking at what was given/recieved. They look worse when you dig deeper, much like you said.

I just saw this last night, which may have been posted before but I wasn't aware of. Just shows that he doesn't have a clue whatsoever.



LOL just keeps getting better and better with Chia.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aerrol

Paralyzer

Oilers Win Cup in 2025
Sep 29, 2006
15,984
8,428
Somewhere Up North
One thing that is driving me nuts about the Koskinen signing is the timing. It's a signal to the entire league that we HAVE to move Talbot now, or lose him for nothing, bringing down his already low value.

Not necessarily true. I don't think we'd have got much for him regardless. There has been only 1 goalie trade I can think of where the team trading the goalie actually got something useful out of it, and that would be Vancouver with Schneider. Rest of them were just dumps anyways.
 

Aerrol

༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ
Sep 18, 2014
6,573
3,291
I mean, it just is. You’re actually going to try and pretend like people say powerforwards just suddenly stop scoring for no particular reason as they age? Everyone says it’s because of the play style, which leads to injuries, and a decline. That simply didn’t happen with Lucic.



No they weren’t. That’s just making things up with hindsight. And plenty of slow players are still effective

This whole argument is dumb semantics - who cares if people were concerned the later contract would be bad because of injuries, or just bad because he'd age and get bad, it's substantially the same point - but I just have to say that if you doubt that people here were upset about contract length at the time of the signing, you're wrong. They were clearly in the minority of posters at the time, but they absolutely were there:

Confirmed with Link: - LOOOOOOOOOOOCH (Oilers Sign Lucic, 7-years, $6M AAV, NMC)

"This really is an abhorrent contract. Hopeful it pays off in the short term.

Money. Term. and the NMC.

Did Chia bother to negotiate? Or did he just fold like he did with the Hall/Larsson deal."

""Ya those details made a suspect contract even worse IMO."

"I approved of the 6 million and term but A full nmc 1st 5 years hinders us if he falls of the cliff"

"Surprised you did not quote my 1st post on this. I guess you approve of a full nmc for 5 years . Is this a good thing? Chia is not a strong GM not going to stop being a fan because I think we have a moron Gm and because I am A Oiler fan does not mean I have to embrace every idiotic move he does like you do . "

"We'll get some good hockey out of Lucic, but ultimately we will regret this signing prior to his 7 year contract running out. Doesn't have the skill or hockey smarts to age gracefully, he relies very heavily on his physical attributes."

And finally, because this made me lol - @GreatKeith posted this:
"People wanted to get bigger, they got bigger.

Should we try to get smaller again?"

Suck on that, people who say all he ever did was bitch about the team's moves. He was there DEFENDING THE LUCIC SIGNING!
 
  • Like
Reactions: space321
Apr 12, 2010
74,890
34,296
Calgary
This whole argument is dumb semantics - who cares if people were concerned the later contract would be bad because of injuries, or just bad because he'd age and get bad, it's substantially the same point - but I just have to say that if you doubt that people here were upset about contract length at the time of the signing, you're wrong. They were clearly in the minority of posters at the time, but they absolutely were there:

Confirmed with Link: - LOOOOOOOOOOOCH (Oilers Sign Lucic, 7-years, $6M AAV, NMC)

"This really is an abhorrent contract. Hopeful it pays off in the short term.

Money. Term. and the NMC.

Did Chia bother to negotiate? Or did he just fold like he did with the Hall/Larsson deal."

""Ya those details made a suspect contract even worse IMO."

"I approved of the 6 million and term but A full nmc 1st 5 years hinders us if he falls of the cliff"

"Surprised you did not quote my 1st post on this. I guess you approve of a full nmc for 5 years . Is this a good thing? Chia is not a strong GM not going to stop being a fan because I think we have a moron Gm and because I am A Oiler fan does not mean I have to embrace every idiotic move he does like you do . "

"We'll get some good hockey out of Lucic, but ultimately we will regret this signing prior to his 7 year contract running out. Doesn't have the skill or hockey smarts to age gracefully, he relies very heavily on his physical attributes."

And finally, because this made me lol - @GreatKeith posted this:
"People wanted to get bigger, they got bigger.

Should we try to get smaller again?"

Suck on that, people who say all he ever did was ***** about the team's moves. He was there DEFENDING THE LUCIC SIGNING!
Mistakes were made. ;) I did like first year Lucic at least.
 
  • Like
Reactions: space321 and Aerrol

Aerrol

༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ
Sep 18, 2014
6,573
3,291
Mistakes were made. ;) I did like first year Lucic at least.

Haha, I didn't like the signing but I didn't think it'd be nearly this bad either. Most of this board was totally wrong about how positive the move was. Just included you because I think you take way too much crap for being 'the negative guy' and get no credit for the many times I've seen you be positive on here.
 
Apr 12, 2010
74,890
34,296
Calgary
Haha, I didn't like the signing but I didn't think it'd be nearly this bad either. Most of this board was totally wrong about how positive the move was. Just included you because I think you take way too much crap for being 'the negative guy' and get no credit for the many times I've seen you be positive on here.
I think that I was excited to get the big bruising Lucic that would ensure the Oilers wouldn't be pushed around.

...And then last year they got pushed around.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aerrol

space321

Registered User
May 11, 2011
6,075
1,899
Because it made 0 sense and Nikitin was not a Top 4 Dman which we desperately needed back then. You can't tell me Lucic was not a Top 6 forward when we signed him. He was supposed to play Top 6 minutes. Nikitin from his past was a top 6-8 defenceman at best. In terms of money, Nikitin was worse.

Just the fact it was only two years takes it out of contention for worst contract.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jamin

oXo Cube

Power Play Merchant
Nov 4, 2008
11,325
12,178
In your closet
The Nikitin trade/sign is comparable to the Manning trade in terms of how completely nonsensical it was.

Oilers management were the only group on planet earth who didn't think it was monumentally stupid the moment it happened.
 

justafan22

Registered User
Jun 22, 2014
11,629
6,252
The Nikitin trade/sign is comparable to the Manning trade in terms of how completely nonsensical it was.

Oilers management were the only group on planet earth who didn't think it was monumentally stupid the moment it happened.

they gave a pick for a pending UFA JFC
 
  • Like
Reactions: oXo Cube
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad