Oilhawks
Over Old Hills
- Nov 24, 2011
- 28,774
- 52,184
A question to many posters I've seen now:
How do you expect to sign Alex Pietrangelo?
Sounds pretty impossible to me.
Why does Minnesota do that trade? And if they do why wouldnt we pair Brodin with Klefbom? Beaulieu would be a 3rd pairing guy IMO.
5. Looking at those Toronto wingers, I wondered if Edmonton is a fit. Leon Draisaitl and Connor McDavid need help. The Maple Leafs and Oilers have been close on some things before. Connor Brown, before he went to Ottawa. Matt Benning and Jujhar Khaira, although that one fell apart when the forward got hurt. But Oilers GM Ken Holland is determined to avoid previous mistakes and not give up on young players too soon. So I’m not sure it works. I do think it is unlikely Edmonton qualifies Andreas Athanasiou, because the tighter cap and his arbitration possibilities make it difficult.
6. On Jesse Puljujarvi, it sounds like the Oilers thought a signing was close, the player not so much. We will see where this goes. A trade is still possible.
Woah! that sounds pretty crazy, we gave up 2* 2nd round picks for him on top of a 4th rd pick for 2 games of Green.Interesting stuff from 31 Thoughts. Kind of affirms what some of us are discussing.
Suter-Spurgeon
Nurse-Dumba
Looks pretty good.
Why does Klfa need to pair with Brodin? They can be roomies off the ice if they want.
As for Beaulieu, i couldnt find another LD with a B.
He would just be a placeholder til Broberg and Berglund are.ready.
Don’t think we lost our 4th mate.Woah! that sounds pretty crazy, we gave up 2* 2nd round picks for him on top of a 4th rd pick for 2 games of Green.
I can't say I'm highly confident AA would earn his $3M QO, but most GM's would just commit from a face saving perspective, the possibility does exist to not give him his QO and re-sign him for cheaper, but it doesn't seem to occur all that often.
From an ice the best team possible perspective re-signing Ennis at just short of $1M seems like a much better use of our limited cap space than AA at $3M.
Woah! that sounds pretty crazy, we gave up 2* 2nd round picks for him on top of a 4th rd pick for 2 games of Green.
I can't say I'm highly confident AA would earn his $3M QO, but most GM's would just commit from a face saving perspective, the possibility does exist to not give him his QO and re-sign him for cheaper, but it doesn't seem to occur all that often.
From an ice the best team possible perspective re-signing Ennis at just short of $1M seems like a much better use of our limited cap space than AA at $3M.
Per CapfriendlyDon’t think we lost our 4th mate.
Feb 24, 2020 | |
---|---|
Detroit Red Wings Acquire: Kyle Brodziak 2020 conditional 4th round pick* (EDM) *Conditions: The 2020 4th round pick upgrades to a 2021 3rd round pick if Edmonton advances to the Conference Final, and Green plays in 50% of the games. Result: Condition not met. Detroit receives the 2020 4th round pick. | Edmonton Oilers Acquire: Mike Green ($2,687,500 retained - 50%) |
Because they played together in Sweden?
They had a fairly substantial overlap in the Farjestad program in the U16, J18, and mens team on top of multiple international teams. It's always a fair point that chemistry might not carry forth to the NHL, but a lot of people want to reunite junior teammates who spent less time playing together than Klef and Brodin did and against weaker competition than the SHL provides.They played for the same team 9 years ago for ten games when they were teenagers and that's why they should be paired together as NHL veterans.
Agreed on all points.If we let AA walk that would be terrible asset management from Holland unless he gets a crazy arbitration ruling. AA showed his best in the play in and is young enough to rebound as a player.
AA didn't click here but over the last 4 years he has 75 goals in 266 games. That's a 23 goal in 82 game pace. At the very least qualify him and trade him. Letting him simply walk would be a massive mistake.
If we let AA walk that would be terrible asset management from Holland unless he gets a crazy arbitration ruling. AA showed his best in the play in and is young enough to rebound as a player.
Not qualifying him would be a mistake. That's literally throwing away 2 seconds. If Holland hates him at least trade him for whatever you can get to recoup some assets. Throwing him away based on a small sample size is absolutely Chiarelli level asset management.His best was still trash that's why there's discussion of him not even being qualified.
You know what's worse than making a mistake? Making an additional mistake because you're trying to justify your original mistake.
Bjugstad has had very little recent success as a center. Russell is probably much easier to move. After his signing bonus he has a real salary of $1.5M vs $5.25M for Bjugstad.Based on things we are gearing about how clearing capspace will be hard it not impossible and most trades will just be player swaps possibly. What about a Russell Bjugstad swap.
Clears space for Jones in the bottom pairing and gets us an actual 3c. Only signed for one more year so if the experiment doesn't work, we aren't tied to him.
I think they are both serviceable but bottom pairing. Larrson with his back injury is a bit concerning. We have some young defenseman that I would like to see get a shot and maybe we can mitigate some of the risk by bringing say green on a cheap contract.It really is time to move on from Russell and Larsson. Sunk cost fallacy with both at this point.
I know people commend Russell as some sort of warrior but he's extremely one dimensional and even that dimension really isn't that good. He deflects a lot of pucks into our net.I think they are both serviceable but bottom pairing. Larrson with his back injury is a bit concerning. We have some young defenseman that I would like to see get a shot and maybe we can mitigate some of the risk by bringing say green on a cheap contract.
Trade Russell to Florida, who are looking to cut costs significantly, for the rights to Haula. He's currently signed for $2.75M/season. Signing Haula at approx. $3M season over a 3-4 year term shouldn't be a problem as he's 29.What kind of coin could we sign both for? I assume that we would have to dump Larssons salary to make it work. Who do we move on from to sign Haula?
I think they are both serviceable but bottom pairing. Larrson with his back injury is a bit concerning. We have some young defenseman that I would like to see get a shot and maybe we can mitigate some of the risk by bringing say green on a cheap contract.