Rumor: Rumors & Proposals Thread | Where's the Beef?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cerebral

Registered User
Aug 4, 2003
23,339
635
Calgary, Alberta
This seems like such a no brainer if he gets to the Oilers. Use LTIR if you need time to figure out how to make the cap work
At the same time, it seems unlikely that Nashville wouldn’t have at least offered him around the league before going with the waivers option. Given the Oilers’ well-known issues on defence, I’d be shocked if the Predators didn’t at least call Bowman up and make an offer.

Fabbro only makes $2.5M but we don’t really have much wiggle room without a contract going out. The tough part is we don’t really have any obvious contracts around that number to move outside of Kulak (and it makes zero sense to love him unless we are getting an upgrade).

Fabbro would definitely be an upgrade on Dermott but can we afford him?

The obvious play is to call up a team near the bottom of the standings and promise them an asset if they’ll claim Fabbro and trade him with 50% retained.
 

Pip

Registered User
Feb 2, 2012
69,662
9,335
Granduland
If you were targeting a RHD that may be available at the deadline, Fabbro would have been near the top of your list.

Now you can get him without sending out any assets? This is why Bowman makes 5 million a year. Figure it out Stan.

Keep your assets to add goaltending at the deadline.
Yep. I don’t think there is an Ekholm deal to be made this year. Really don’t think Andersson is realistic. Fabbro is going to be similar to the rental D that you’ll have to expend assets for at the deadline.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Heavy Dee
Apr 12, 2010
76,191
35,342
Calgary
If you were targeting a RHD that may be available at the deadline, Fabbro would have been near the top of your list.

Now you can get him without sending out any assets? This is why Bowman makes 5 million a year. Figure it out Stan.

Keep your assets to add goaltending at the deadline.
Bowman really makes that much? Gross.
 

McHelpus

Registered User
Jan 16, 2021
2,676
3,805
I can see NSH calling EDM and Bowman just feeling like the D is great lol.
Yup. Also, it's Stan Bowman I doubt teams want to make him look good. Wouldn't be surprised if trotz asked for a 1st for 50% seeing our defensive group. Oh well, least they can accure cap until they acquire Connor Murphy for a 1st lol.
 

Sethual

Registered User
Oct 9, 2024
281
187
Yes he is trying to do things he shouldn't be and needs to limited to what he can do well but wow your response is tooo oo emotional. Maybe you should consider your preferred stress reliever.
Or is it that im not emotional enough?
Emotions are what make us human. Unless you are a bot set up to defend the Oilers and Nurse specifically then touche
 

5 Mins 4 Ftg

Life is better with no expectations.
Sponsor
Apr 3, 2016
52,497
91,642
Edmonton
Changes to current standings as of November 1st, so there’s 9 teams plus Nashville ahead of the Oilers in the claim priority order.

Thank you. I think that he is claimed before we can take him, if nothing else than for a trade chip by a lower team. Strange Nashville didn’t just trade him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDoused

Oilhawks

Like Some Snow-White Marble Eyes
Nov 24, 2011
29,207
53,204
26 years old.
RHD
2.5M cap hit
UFA next year.

Why is Nash waiving him? This is odd.

A good player but a bit overrated by some, likely a message being sent as some have suggested.

Not the same player, but a decent Ceci replacement (unspectacular right shot 5D with warts).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Faelko

BarDownBobo

Registered User
Oct 19, 2012
6,615
3,524
City of Champions
Thank you. I think that he is claimed before we can take him, if nothing else than for a trade chip by a lower team. Strange Nashville didn’t just trade him.
If all teams were offering was like a 4th/5th round pick I could see them feeling like it’s more valuable to try and sneak him through so they retain his rights. I doubt it’ll happen thought and I’ll be very disappointed if Bowman doesn’t put a claim in here.
 

McDNicks17

Moderator
Jul 1, 2010
42,956
33,629
Ontario
I can't see there being a claim just because the only realistic way for them to clear cap after Kane gets back is moving Arvidsson or Henrique because they don't have NTC/NMCs and I wouldn't say trading either of them after giving them two year deals is all that realistic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oilhawks

McDNicks17

Moderator
Jul 1, 2010
42,956
33,629
Ontario
Ohh. We might get a chance to complain about not claiming two players.

I saw a post from a Sharks fan that says they'd likely waive Kostin if they claimed Fabbro.
 

VeteranPresence

Registered User
Aug 13, 2024
735
1,180
Really unhappy that Bowman couldn’t find a way to get this player at 50%, even with a third team playing broker. The only asset we seemingly would have needed to give up is a pick for retention.

Now though Fabbro easily gets claimed, plays actual minutes on another team, and sees his value improve. Not very smart work at all by our GM.
 

North

Registered User
Jun 25, 2009
16,335
14,676
Really unhappy that Bowman couldn’t find a way to get this player at 50%, even with a third team playing broker. The only asset we seemingly would have needed to give up is a pick for retention.

Now though Fabbro easily gets claimed, plays actual minutes on another team, and sees his value improve. Not very smart work at all by our GM.
Did you just create a whole narrative to get upset about?
 

Fourier

Registered User
Dec 29, 2006
26,910
22,835
Waterloo Ontario
Waivers claim order starts from current standings as of when? Or are we still going from last years standings?

Either way I doubt Fabbro will be around by the time we can claim him.
As of November 1 it flips to this year's standings. I believe the Oilers would be 10th in line to claim him.

LTIR Kane. Figure it out from there.
Kane is already on LTIR.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 Mins 4 Ftg

Fourier

Registered User
Dec 29, 2006
26,910
22,835
Waterloo Ontario
At the same time, it seems unlikely that Nashville wouldn’t have at least offered him around the league before going with the waivers option. Given the Oilers’ well-known issues on defence, I’d be shocked if the Predators didn’t at least call Bowman up and make an offer.

Fabbro only makes $2.5M but we don’t really have much wiggle room without a contract going out. The tough part is we don’t really have any obvious contracts around that number to move outside of Kulak (and it makes zero sense to love him unless we are getting an upgrade).

Fabbro would definitely be an upgrade on Dermott but can we afford him?

The obvious play is to call up a team near the bottom of the standings and promise them an asset if they’ll claim Fabbro and trade him with 50% retained.
If they picked up Fabbro the risk is that he might have to be the big move to fix the second pairing RHD. As you say there is no other contract aside from Kulak that they could move out to recoup the cap space they would need for a deadline move. And they would pretty much eliminate the chance to accrue space until Kane comes back. So while on the surface it seems an easy gamble it is somewhat more complicated than one might think.

The problem with your trade scenario is that a team cannot trade a player they picked up on waivers without first offering the player to any other team who put in a claim. So while your scenario would be ideal and should not cost much it is a bit of a long shot since Fabbro with likely be claimed by more than one team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TopShelfGloveSide
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad