Jimmi McJenkins
Sometimes miracles
We could then acquire Brodin and re-unite two pairings!
Sekera-Faulk
Klefbom-Brodin
As long as Brodin only costs you a 2nd.
We could then acquire Brodin and re-unite two pairings!
Sekera-Faulk
Klefbom-Brodin
I think we are going to acquire Faulk and it's going to cost us RNH + 4OA.
This will make us a way better team.
I think we are going to acquire Faulk and it's going to cost us RNH + 4OA.
This will make us a way better team.
I think we are going to acquire Faulk and it's going to cost us RNH + 4OA.
This will make us a way better team.
I'm a big fan of RNH but I'd definitely do this.
Yup I am happy too. That'd be a MacT move TBH.
Adding a 26 year old top4 RHD is a MacT move? When did he do that and where is that player now? The only 26 year old top4 RHD MacT had anything to do with was a guy who is now playing for the Montreal Canadiens. Adding Bogosian would the opposite of a MacT move.
I think he meant giving up the 4th overall pick in a deal for Bogosian is a Mac-T move. I think I mostly agree.
I'm reminded of last year when I think about the pink panty panic over value, Remember when Cam Talbot was going to cost a 1st +? Exactly.
If it's 4th overall for 8th overall + Bogo that's a very good move. 4th overall straight across for Bogo? Hell no.
Adding a 26 year old top4 RHD is a MacT move? When did he do that and where is that player now? The only 26 year old top4 RHD MacT had anything to do with was a guy who is now playing for the Montreal Canadiens. Adding Bogosian would the opposite of a MacT move.
Adding a 26 year old top4 RHD is a MacT move? When did he do that and where is that player now? The only 26 year old top4 RHD MacT had anything to do with was a guy who is now playing for the Montreal Canadiens. Adding Bogosian would the opposite of a MacT move.
If it's 4th overall for 8th overall + Bogo that's a very good move. 4th overall straight across for Bogo? Hell no.
As Jimmi said, it's the fact we went for a guy who hasn't tracked very well for a Top 2 dman and looks to be just a good Top 4 Dman. That's what I mean as a MacT move. Only going for the lowest option and overpay while doing it.
Moving down 4 spots in a draft for a top4 d-man is an overpayment? Okay.
Moving down 4 spots in a draft for a top4 d-man is an overpayment? Okay.
Don't go near Bogosian.
We need Faulk. Play him with a defensively sound player like Davidson and they will handle everything thrown at them.
Let Klefbom be creative and give him a defensive minded partner like Fayne.
I think people are wary of Bogo due to his less than stellar health record. I'd be down with acquiring 8th+Bogo if the 4th isn't Jesse P.
Don't go near Bogosian.
We need Faulk. Play him with a defensively sound player like Davidson and they will handle everything thrown at them.
Let Klefbom be creative and give him a defensive minded partner like Fayne.
Moving down 4 spots in a draft for a top4 d-man is an overpayment? Okay.
I think people are wary of Bogo due to his less than stellar health record. I'd be down with acquiring 8th+Bogo if the 4th isn't Jesse P.
Your view of Bogosian is a lot different than a lot of people here on HF. He's not worth the risk. I've been hearing the same thing about him having the toolbox but no tools. He's not smart with the puck. I'd rather have Petry than Bogosian TBH.
Don't go near Faulk.
We need Doughty.
Faulk would be great, and probably good to move on from Fayne
Don't go near Faulk.
We need Doughty.