I'd be like, Hey Jarmo, just pass on Puljujarvi at #3 and we won't offersheet Jones.
The problem in this scenario is that Jones has to actually want out of Columbus and sign the offer sheet. The odds of a team having all the pieces and money plus being a team he wants to go to AND the CBJ not matching are highly unlikely. I doubt he wants to leave a good young team which he has already been given the top spot and has good chemistry with a partner for the unknown. It's not happening.
I think Barrie could be an OS target, if the Avs are willing to take him to arbitration then its likely you could OS him to a long term deal they wouldn't be willing to match. The price paid for Seth Jones makes it nearly impossible for them not to match.
Draisaitl + 4th OVR for Jones + 3rd OVR?
Draisaitl + 4th OVR for Jones + 3rd OVR?
Hamonic provides more offense at 5v5 than Vatanen does. Vatanen shines on the PP. But when it comes to even strength production, Hamonic wins out.I'd rather just keep Vatanen. Hamonic doesn't provide any offense, and what the Oilers need most are puck moving dmen.
Almost all RFAs sign an offer sheet if given one.
Vanek signed his here so did Penner, the Sabres just matched on Vanek.
Hamonic provides more offense at 5v5 than Vatanen does. Vatanen shines on the PP. But when it comes to even strength production, Hamonic wins out.
No. It's just that you only here about offer sheets that players sign. A team can send out a million offer sheets but if a player doesn't agree to it, we'd never hear about it.
If the Avs are willing to go through arbitration, you can't offer-sheet him.
I feel pretty confident Jones would sign.
That kinda stuff I'm not worried about. It's Columbus possibly matching it that would be the issue.
Personally I think the number of offer sheets that are turned down by the player are pretty damn small. They have to be absolutely in love with the situation they're in, how much can Seth Jones really be attached to with Columbus, he played a whopping 41 games for them and Tortorella is a hard ass.
Hamonic provides more offense at 5v5 than Vatanen does. Vatanen shines on the PP. But when it comes to even strength production, Hamonic wins out.
We most need it on the PP, though.
Do we?
The Oilers ranked higher on the PP than in 5v5 goals for. And more important than either is preventing goals at 5v5 where the Oilers were the worst team in the league. Hamonic would go a lot further at helping that than Vatanen.
If they throw their Goal Cannon in I'm down. That way we can send MacTavish off in grand fashion when his contract runs out in a few weeks.
Yes, they do.
While the Oilers are better 5v4 than they are 5v5, we should be near or at the top of the entire league 5v4 and aren't. We arguably have no player on the team, forward or defense, who belongs on the first unit PP playing the point. It's a serious weakness that keeps what should be the teams greatest strength from being much of a strength at all.
While the Oilers aren't exactly flush in ES point getters either, at least we have Andrej Sekera and Oscar Klefbom, who are at least reasonable in that regard.
I mean, ideally we'd be adding both a Vatanen and Hamonic but I don't really know how that happens.
You could front load to really make it hard
8.75/8/7/7/6/6/6 = 7 per cap hit, but Columbus would be paying probably beyond the salary cap in actually salary for a couple of years ... don't think they want anything to do with that.
I give them the choice of either matching that offer sheet or taking Nugent Hopkins straight across.
It's ****ing ruthless, but maybe it's time for that approach.
Draisaitl + 4th OVR for Jones + 3rd OVR?
Yet Dubois is still ranked higher.
I don't have to wait until the draft to know that advocating for the Oilers to draft for need rather than BPA is counter to what good organizations do.
Oilers could've had Murray instead of Yakupov if they drafted by need.
Doesn't Edmonton have to provide a first, second and third round pick for an offer sheet AAV of $7,000,000? I thought we owed Boston that 2nd rounder from the Chiarelli deal. Did something change?
NAy, they would have drafted Murray if they had listened to their scouts rank of BPA. Position had nothing to do with it. They truly felt Murray was the BPA and they said so.
It's kinda hard to say now. Virtually every scouting service I recall from that year had Yakupov no.1 with a bullet. The only reason Murray was even remotely discussed as no.1 was because we got the no.1 pick and we had taken two forwards with previous no.1s.
If Montreal or Columbus won the lottery they'd have taken Yakupov, I have zero doubt.
He was supposed to be like a mini-Ovechkin and he honestly did play a lot like that in junior.
If we had Murray we'd still suck, all it would've changed would probably be a couple of points in the standings at best -- enough for us probably to not have McDavid, but it's not like we'd be contenders with Murray.
None of the teams are going to help Edmonton with a solid established dman unless they really overpay. Oilers will likely end up with a guy from the UFA crop or gamble on a lesser known dude.
Maybe we can get some news about something today... anything please God anything before I go crazy. Hate the quite timesure. Here's to hope that it is the question before the storm