gordonhught
Registered User
- Feb 18, 2009
- 14,524
- 13,503
I'd prefer if they just give him a short call up before they write him in, but he's certainly earned a look if the opportunity arises.Maybe the Oilers are going to add Lavoie as a depth RW?
You have to wonder when the NHL realizes that a cap that escalates this slowly is damaging their product.
Half joking. I am a bit concerned about the lack of RW depth. If Yamo goes down ...I'd prefer if they just give him a short call up before they write him in, but he's certainly earned a look if the opportunity arises.
So basically the initial increase bettman had was $4M to $86.5M nxt year as of September.NHL and PA have an agreement in place to not raise the cap until the Escrow account the players owe the owners is repaid in full.
Most projections have it falling just short of that this season. Close enough that some believe both sides will put pressure on Bettman to let it go and let the cap escalate.
They found the right NA city. Not many cities have as much green space as Edmonton and you can walk and see a Moose, deer, beavers, etc and just fully enveloped green spaces. One of the really nice things is we've protected our river valley and ravine spaces more than most Urban areas have done.Ya lots of choices.
I was lucky enough to move into that area (basic bungalow). I never knew how awesome the river valley is. Some of the forest trails make you feel like you aren’t in a city. We’ve bought kayaks to use on the river too.
I think Ekholm will really enjoy the city. People like to crap on our city but it’s really beautiful if you like to get outdoors.
I disagree I think he’ll be a RW for us
NoooooooSorry, I must have missed something.
If the revenue projections Bettman made earlier hold I think there will be a negotiated increase. Otherwise it really impacts new free agents. If they don't increase the cap by more than $1M I could see a lot of guys signing one year deals hoping for a big payoff in 2024-2025.NHL and PA have an agreement in place to not raise the cap until the Escrow account the players owe the owners is repaid in full.
Most projections have it falling just short of that this season. Close enough that some believe both sides will put pressure on Bettman to let it go and let the cap escalate.
so getting Ekholm and Bjugstad was lazyThe oilers not sending down Shore and upgrading is stupid and lazy.
Cap is only going up $1MM this year right?
Question why so low with the revenues now (including the amount the players owe) isnt there room for a fairly sizeable increase?
I pointed out earlier that there is maybe 4 players available with 50% retention that would be good adds that are clear improvements on Shore, which none of them have been moved today.The oilers not sending down Shore and upgrading is stupid and lazy.
Is this photoshopped?
If AZ did that?????If the revenue projections Bettman made earlier hold I think there will be a negotiated increase. Otherwise it really impacts new free agents. If they don't increase the cap by more than $1M I could see a lot of guys signing one year deals hoping for a big payoff in 2024-2025.
What would really choke me is if they kept it at $83.5M and teams like Arizona made a killing selling their cap sapce while not even trying to compete.
What they can do nowadays. Just amazing.Far from it. Meme generator site. Gotta keep them low budget.
so getting Ekholm and Bjugstad was lazy