Rumor: Rumors & Proposals: "But it was not, an interesting day" - the narrator

Will it be an interesting (Fri)day in Oil Country?

  • Sources say it could be

    Votes: 21 15.7%
  • Sources say nothing imminent

    Votes: 19 14.2%
  • Sources say tarot cards are my sources

    Votes: 31 23.1%
  • Sources say "ask again later".

    Votes: 63 47.0%

  • Total voters
    134
Status
Not open for further replies.

Lay Z Boy GM

Registered User
Sep 8, 2010
6,575
7,555
Vancouver
First period over. Sharks stink but Karlsson looks masterful on the PP. Super composed, roams all over the ice, so f***ing skilled. He looks like he did on the Sens but not as fast, but still a great skater.

They didn’t score but that PP was all about Karlsson, Vegas was focused on him even when he didn’t have the puck.
 

McBooya42

Let's do this!
Jun 28, 2010
9,197
7,196
Edmonton
I am not in favor of a Karlsson trade if Vinnie D and/or Kane are involved ... just speculating because they, along with the Scarecrow, sat today - coach referring to "maintenance days." Those two make up almost all our grit. They're the kind of players we need in the playoffs. Hoping it really was a maintenance day for the two ... Jesse "scarecrow" Puljujarvi can be fired into the sun for all I care.
"Yeah, we had a couple of maintenance days going on, and kept some people off the ice - make sure ahh...they're getting the right amount of rest...we'll see." <smirks at the camera> - Coach Jay Woodcroft

I, sincerely, still believe a price can be achieved between the 2 teams and I think Karlsson will be an Oiler at the end of that.

It makes a lot of sense for both teams
That's what I feel too. This can be a win win for both teams if done right. Grier's first big trade too that will save the ownership probably at least 24 million - yes it will cost, but not as MUCH.
 

VainGretzky

Registered User
Jun 4, 2015
14,033
12,736
First period over. Sharks stink but Karlsson looks masterful on the PP. Super composed, roams all over the ice, so f***ing skilled. He looks like he did on the Sens but not as fast, but still a great skater.

They didn’t score but that PP was all about Karlsson, Vegas was focused on him even when he didn’t have the puck.
Did he have a big smirk on his face
 

McBooya42

Let's do this!
Jun 28, 2010
9,197
7,196
Edmonton
Did he have a big smirk on his face
Jay Woodcroft.jpg
 

Mcnotloilersfan

I'm here, I'm bored
Jul 11, 2010
11,328
5,580
Niagara
It's not 3M any more.
Yes it is.

Correct me if I'm wrong but because we are over the cap from LTIR, our cap doesn't factor in percentage of season that has gone by.

Example. If we weren't and LTIR team, and we acquired a 6m player 2/3 into the season, they would only hit our cap as 2m. But since we are an LTIR team, we just look firmly at players AAV for the 82.5 cap hit. So acquiring that player would hit us at 6m.

But it also works the other way around. Losing JP means we get 3m off our cap worries.

Again please correct me if I'm wrong, but I feel like that's how our cap situation works
 
  • Like
Reactions: Louis Cypher

AddyTheWrath

Registered User
Mar 24, 2015
11,443
20,171
Toronto
Yes it is.

Correct me if I'm wrong but because we are over the cap from LTIR, our cap doesn't factor in percentage of season that has gone by.

Example. If we weren't and LTIR team, and we acquired a 6m player 2/3 into the season, they would only hit our cap as 2m. But since we are an LTIR team, we just look firmly at players AAV for the 82.5 cap hit. So acquiring that player would hit us at 6m.

But it also works the other way around. Losing JP means we get 3m off our cap worries.

Again please correct me if I'm wrong, but I feel like that's how our cap situation works
It’s not 3M if he goes to a team not on LTIR though right?
 

McXLNC97

Registered User
Mar 20, 2007
5,335
2,208
B.C.
Sharks are retaining 2.72m for another two years after this on Burns contract. That's 34% of his 8m cap hit, giving the Hurricanes a 5.28m cap hit for Burns. If they did 34% on Karlsson, that brings him down to 7.59m for the Oilers. So it's not like the Sharks aren't willing to retain because they are doing it for multiple years with Burns....not to mention the return the Sharks got for Burns was very very sad.
 

NedPlimpton

Registered User
Mar 23, 2013
6,489
10,390
Near Fantastica
I just saw Woody at a gas station and I didn't want to bother him but eventually worked up the nerve as he was finishing fueling and asked quickly, from a distance "what's the word on special K65?" and he winked and said "hold on to your tits" before he drove off into the night.

I get the sense something is occurring.
 

tinfish

Registered User
Jul 6, 2011
2,181
1,437
Edmonton
Sharks are retaining 2.72m for another two years after this on Burns contract. That's 34% of his 8m cap hit, giving the Hurricanes a 5.28m cap hit for Burns. If they did 34% on Karlsson, that brings him down to 7.59m for the Oilers. So it's not like the Sharks aren't willing to retain because they are doing it for multiple years with Burns....not to mention the return the Sharks got for Burns was very very sad.
That's why the idea of people willing to give up multiple 1sts and prospects turns my stomach. Karlsson could turn back into dogshit like he was the past two years. San Jose would have had to offer multiple 1sts to take his contract with 50% retention last year. This idea that he's suddenly 25 year old Karlsson again is bonkers
 
  • Like
Reactions: Biltmore

KanesThrowaway

Registered User
Aug 24, 2021
170
420
My sense is the oilers could do something tomorrow. It could be a trade, or it might not be. They could send some guys down, but they also might not. They also might not do anything at all. Then again, things can change quickly. Sometimes they don't though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad