GKJ
Global Moderator
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2002
- Messages
- 194,704
- Likes
- 44,473
Last edited:
The list of NHL team's who have fans that suffer more than us is growing dangerously thin.
Can they ever just say: "This is a player with phenomenal skill"?
No one knows upside like Chuck Fletcher.
I firmly believe the Flyers are destined to be the next Chicago Cubs of sports, 50 year drought is already here, what's to stop this drought from another 30 years?
It easy to say trade down, but in practice it's often difficult, especially when there's no one that someone below you falls in love with and are willing to pay a premium to move up. It's not like other teams were trading down.The 3 biggest boondoggles in drafting high are 1.) reaching on centers 2.) reaching on size 3) reaching on shoot-first players. Re-drafts are littered with the skulls of these archetypes, because teams want the good versions desperately, and Chuck Fletcher is an unimaginative GM who obsesses over certain traits and certain players. In a gallows humor way, it was always the obvious pick for this team.
Without saying Gauthier can't be a useful player, the Flyers possibly pulled the trifecta, and that's if Gauthier can even play center. I'm slightly more open to it than some -- I think he operates better in space, his puck control is fine, he's a utilitarian passer, and he already gravitates towards 3rd man high (so much for that PWF label, eh?) -- but it's assuming added risk, without a reward in keeping with 5th overall. If he can't make the switch, it's that much worse. It's hard to escape the idea they drafted your garden variety 15th overall type at 5th.
This isn't a gigantic swing, like it's being portrayed. That's the stuff that dreams are made of. It's a middle 6 floor pick. I'm skeptical he projects as a top end player, without anything resembling high-end skill or creativity; he'll probably always be a complimentary player, at ES/PP (flank?....trigger?). I'm a believer in this level pick needing to be used on real impact line drivers with a path to stardom. They painted themselves into a corner, colored by daydreams and (alleged) fit, to all but guarantee it looks bad from a future value/evaluative standpoint. The Flyers talking about needing elite talent, while not wanting to rebuild, and making this pick are totally incongruous. I'll gladly eat my words, but this will be one of those "what could've been" picks. It's the exact type of pick that prevents this organization from achieving escape velocity from the bubble.
It easy to say trade down, but in practice it's often difficult, especially when there's no one that someone below you falls in love with and are willing to pay a premium to move up. It's not like other teams were trading down.
One reason Roseman started making some of these deals pre-draft was getting burned on draft day.
It takes two to tango.
Well, weren't there a lot of question marks about Juricek?I don't disagree, but Jiricek was also on the board. God knows where the Flyers ranked Gauthier (top 3?), so I'm going to guess this is a scenario that had more to do with how they valued the pick than a lack of viable offers.
It was him or a RHD with a bad knee (why would the Flyers shy away from a top pick with an injury history?).
Gauthier is a risky pick, so was everyone else left on the board.
If he can play center, he fills a big need - if not, he'll still be a solid fit at LW, which after JVR leaves is basically Farabee, Lindblom, Laughton and Cates, and Desnoyers (if he moves from center). Unless you think Ratcliffe has top 9 potential or Lycksell is going to emerge as a major offensive force.
Once thing I like about big centers, as we've seen with Couts, is it's easier to fit smaller wings around them - and you can find smaller scoring wings well into the second round, big centers rarely are found past pick #20. So from roster construction, IF he pans out at center it's a big win. At LW, it's more a high ceiling pick. WIth his size, skating and shot, he could be a solid PF at LW, but unlikely to be a star.
He's basically BPA at the point in this draft where the only better player had injury concerns, after that, throw names into a hat.
Flyers got screwed again, if they stay at #4, they have a no-brainer pick.
Just remembered that the Hakshell cost the Flyers the #4 pick by blowing a 2 goal 3rd period lead in that make up game against Winnipeg.
Would the Flyers have taken Wright at #4, or would Fletcher's connection have still won out?
This is how I picture Fletcher conducting the interview:
Can they ever just say: "This is a player with phenomenal skill"?
No one knows upside like Chuck Fletcher. Aim low, it's all upside, baby.
He's the spitting image of Flahr at half the size.
Well, weren't there a lot of question marks about Juricek?
Brent Flahrkonnen