GKJ
Global Moderator
- Feb 27, 2002
- 193,015
- 43,513
So guys like Cooley and Nazur are much younger?In the US system, the age cutoff works so that he's older than almost everyone around in his year, and he's at a developmental age where that can matter a lot. January birthdays tend to underperform relative to draft position.
So yes. It is a solid critique, thanks.
So guys like Cooley and Nazur are much younger?
Like a year or a few months? I mentioned nazar because a few said he has more upside. I guess even at his advanced age.Nazar was taken quite a bit later and yes, Cooley is younger.
Like a year or a few months? I mentioned nazar because a few said he has more upside. I guess even at his advanced age.
So disingenuous…. cooley is 4 months younger. While the other 5 are within 2 month of each other. With 2 being actually being older. Yes, definitely a solid critique.Lots of prospects are highly gifted athletes, and that's true across all sports. There's more to success than athletic talent at the highest levels.
If anything, it should be concerning that he's possibly just gotten by so far on being a better athlete and borderline over-ager. Fletcher never gravitates towards players with brainpower.
Do you have any athletic ability at all? Seriously, if you do, you should find that kinda impressive.He may have more upside. Gauthier doesn't really have any standout skills. Aside from hitting a golf ball ambidextrously, which doesn't really come in handy in hockey games.
So disingenuous…. cooley is 4 months younger. While the other 5 are within 2 month of each other. With 2 being actually being older. Yes, definitely a solid critique.
Do you have any athletic ability at all? Seriously, if you do, you should find that kinda impressive.
Did the Flyers pass on Cooley? Nope, just another spin job. Have you ever hit a golf ball 280 yards one way? Trust me it takes high end skill.Four months matters. US players with May birthdays are more successful relative to expectation.
All of these guys are impressive athletically. Being ambidextrous just isn't that big a deal. It's not going to make him better at hockey.
If all the guys are impressive athletically, why do they have combines?Four months matters. US players with May birthdays are more successful relative to expectation.
All of these guys are impressive athletically. Being ambidextrous just isn't that big a deal. It's not going to make him better at hockey.
Could be a good thing. A kid with confidence might thrive and grow.Boston College's roster looks incredibly short on skill next season -- and they were average offensively last season -- so I am curious to see what playing a new position without the talent of the USNTDP looks like. There is a heavy burden on him to create his own offense.
Yeah this isn't your Kevin Hayes' BC team. They have some OK defensemen (JSI!) but no one up front really.Boston College's roster looks incredibly short on skill next season -- and they were average offensively last season -- so I am curious to see what playing a new position without the talent of the USNTDP looks like. There is a heavy burden on him to create his own offense.
I think a PPG season would be a big win.
Did the Flyers pass on Cooley? Nope, just another spin job. Have you ever hit a golf ball 280 yards one way? Trust me it takes high end skill.
Can you believe this guy didn't go number 1 given his talent and eye coordinationNo talent involved in that? And driving a ball 280 yards from both sides of the plate is pretty damn impressive. Just a question, have you ever done anything atheletic in your life? Regarding hand-eye coordination?
Jamarcus Russell would f*** UP the NHL.Someone check if he can throw a football through the uprights from his knees at the 50yd line. I would feel better for sure.
I would have preferred Nazar too (or a trade back to get Gauthier if that was their guy or anyone else really). But I don't think it is so one-sided that picking Gauthier over Nazar (or Jiricek or whomever) is shocking or laughable or somehow proof that this is a bad pick because it was made by the Flyers.I think nazar is clearly better and much higher ceiling. Elite ceiling not maybe will become a first liner
I grew my toe back.Does anyone here have ANY athletic ability?
@BigToe can we get a ruling?I grew my toe back.
Does that count?
Does anyone here have ANY athletic ability?
So you heard this hype elsewhere? Not just from me? The non-hockey skills? That’s all the hype surrounding him? That raised your concern level? You are so disingenuous. Nice spin again.When I assess a hockey player I like hearing about their high end hockey skills. When the hype around him revolves around feats in non-hockey sports, that's a red flag.
I've watched thousands of hockey games, and as much footage as I can find from all eras. I must say, in all that viewing I've never once seen a single game involve an ambidextrous longest drive competition affect any of those games meaningfully. In fact, I've never seen one break out during a game at all. Until that becomes a regular part.of the sport I think I'll continue not caring about that unrelated skill.
Don't get me wrong, so long as the Flyers horrid development process doesn't further lower his ceiling, he should hopefully become a useful NHL player. But he's a safety pick. The Flyers passed on higher ceilings and others with better skills at getting the puck up ice and driving play in favor of a guy who has gotten by on big-boying smaller players. We need skill and high ceiling players desperately. Fletcher always passes on them for false safety. We don't need more Laughtons and Tippetts.
I would have preferred Nazar too (or a trade back to get Gauthier if that was their guy or anyone else really). But I don't think it is so one-sided that picking Gauthier over Nazar (or Jiricek or whomever) is shocking or laughable or somehow proof that this is a bad pick because it was made by the Flyers.