KingsHockey24
Registered User
- Aug 1, 2013
- 14,764
- 13,620
Lets think of the positive things guys, likee Gaboriks sick goal. When was the last time we saw someone do that in a Kings uni?
Like others have said, when you lose this soundly, there's plenty of blame to go around. Hopefully Lombardi is able to detach emotionally and make a roster and make the necessary moves. The 2012 run is two years removed at this point - the kiddy gloves need to come off. The "heart and soul guys" need to be honestly evaluated, as well as the D core and bottom six. One thing I will never say about DL is that he's a lazy GM. Guy burns the candle at both ends, so let's just hope he has the insight to retool properly.
I do feel that Brown is getting a bit of a pass. All we hear about is Richards this and Richards that (and yes, he's been awful). Hell, there even had to be a dedicated ***** about Richards thread. Look at the numbers though:
On the bright side, the Kings didn't give up buckets of odd-man rushes last night. And they seemed to have figured out how to take away the stretch pass and the neutral zone cross icer.
It's a process, people.
I called Mike Richards two years ago and was vilified. Can we trade him straight up for David Clarkson?
Lets think of the positive things guys, likee Gaboriks sick goal. When was the last time we saw someone do that in a Kings uni?
Have King and Williams been good in this series? No, but i'd hardly blame it on them. Brown and Richards need more of the blame on this one.
QUOTE]
im not talking about blame...im talking about changes that have to be made
Brown and Richards at this point have more upside than Williams and King
thats my point
Williams is on a decline and King is King...nothing more than what we are seeing now
so they go
thats it
I'd be more open to trading Williams than I was, but I'd move Brown and Richards before anyone else. Actually, Brown first and then Richards. King and Williams don't have a huge salary cap hit for their production..that is what you need to look at.
Really? Did you not read the first paragraph of my post? Guess not. Well since you missed it or your reading comprehension is bad I said the Kings have done a good job finding complimentary players in the later rounds. But you are not going to build a championship caliber roster by hitting singles on bottom six and third pair defenders in later rounds , when it comes to the first round, outside of #2 overall pick Doughty the Kings have not hit a homerun and have actually struck out multiple times in round one. I think we all agree the Kings defense is aging and slowing down and there really isn't anyone in house who is ready to be anything more than a bottom pairing defender, you are crazy if you think two terrible and one questionable pick used on defenders from 07-10 isn't playing a part in that. If even one of Hickey, Teubert or Forbort had lived up to potential and been a Top 4 defenseman the Kings are in much much better shape than they currently are on the back end.
So again, not being critical of the drafting outside of round 1, and the Kings have a nice group of role players but a lot of the issues with the depth on this team go back to the misses and the traded first round picks, there is no disputing it.
I felt way more deflated after games 1 & 2. San Jose got the bounces last night. 3 of their goals were flukes (thank RR for knocking over Quick).
I liked the game last night as the Kings were actually hitting. Brown, Richards and mostly Stoll were throwing their weight around. Hell even Carter threw a big one.
If LA were to have played like that the first two games this series would not be all but over. If they finish it out playing like that I can wear my jerseys with pride. not that I wouldn't anyway.
One last point - if the Kings had not been blown out the 1st two games - if they lost in 5,6, or 7 in games like last night by a goal or in OT, would we be seeing so many posts looking for DL to blow up this team?
Amen.
I want to fire Regehr out of a cannon, maybe not his fault he's getting the minutes he's getting, but he was a big cause of last night's ultimate result![]()
Great post skolgar. I will say though that the criticism of McNabb is his footspeed, so there's that.
As an aside, this will be the first time Quick (and others, I'm sure) gets to rest and relax without rehabbing an injury. Theoretically, he will go into next season fully healthy, conditioned, and coached. Since the cup run, he's had back surgery and a groin injury...
I was hoping to see McNabb potentially get into the playoffs as a black ace.
Wasn't he getting like 20 minutes in the NHL two seasons ago? I know it was with Buffalo but still that is great experience.
Going back to the Chicago series, Kings have one win against teams that are fast and have an explosive offense. A record of 1-7-0 with just about the same cast of players on the roster. Something needs to be addressed.
Lets think of the positive things guys, likee Gaboriks sick goal. When was the last time we saw someone do that in a Kings uni?
A lot does need to change. I expect Lombardi to react and we will see what comes at the draft. Our defense definitely needs to become younger and faster. Regehr is the only guy I want back of the veterans, but as a bottom pairing guy.
On the bright side, it was really nice to see a few Kings attack the net. It was a breath of fresh air to see this last night:
Unfortunately, the only players we have capable of anything like that is Carter, Kopitar, Gaborik, and maybe Doughty.
The Kings got zero, ZERO even strength goals from the bottom six in 18 playoff games last year and the only change Dean made was bringing in Carcillo for Richardson.
That was one of Dean's poorest decisions as GM, not addressing the bottom six after the disaster of last years playoffs. To me it sent a horrible message that no one down there was held accountable for that performance. In fact Clifford and Lewis were given extensions with raises.
The Kings got zero, ZERO even strength goals from the bottom six in 18 playoff games last year and the only change Dean made was bringing in Carcillo for Richardson.
That was one of Dean's poorest decisions as GM, not addressing the bottom six after the disaster of last years playoffs. To me it sent a horrible message that no one down there was held accountable for that performance. In fact Clifford and Lewis were given extensions with raises.
Going back to the Chicago series, Kings have one win against teams that are fast and have an explosive offense. A record of 1-7-0 with just about the same cast of players on the roster. Something needs to be addressed.
Same. Theoretically, he's as NHL ready as they come, but I'm sure the team will like to do some development work with him. He was seeing time with Buffalo, yes