Roster Moves: Roster Thread Talk 2021: it never ends

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Worst case scenario is way worse than Myers. Myers was at least cheap. Risto is not, so he's not just an anchor but an impediment to adding better players to boot.

And Risto "only" becoming 2nd pair quality is still a massive leap for him. You're expecting an awful lot.

A player needs to do more than chase hits to be worthwhile.
I’d label 4 40-point seasons by age 26, & 12th among all defensemen in primary assists the last 3 seasons, as “worthwhile.”

People describe Risto like he’s a no-talent slug which simply isn’t accurate. We’ll see how his defensive game looks in a new environment, but I’m not writing off Risto’s chances to be an effective 2nd pair RHD before he plays a single game here.

And the D absolutely had to get more physical in defending around the net. It was an abomination last season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LorneMalvo
I’d label 4 40-point seasons by age 26, & 12th among all defensemen in primary assists the last 3 seasons, as “worthwhile.”

People describe Risto like he’s a no-talent slug which simply isn’t accurate. We’ll see how his defensive game looks in a new environment, but I’m not writing off Risto’s chances to be an effective 2nd pair RHD before he plays a single game here.

And the D absolutely had to get more physical in defending around the net. It was an abomination last season.

Did you remember to account for the fact that his defense is so terrible that it more than cancels out offensive production?

He's everything you claim Sanheim and Ghost are in that regard. Oh, and there's more to defense than hitting.

Edit: oh, and the bulk of goals last season came from mid range and beyond. Exactly the areas Risto is weakest at.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ironmanrulez
Lots of just assumptions though. You guys act like you're in the boardroom, just assuming if you write a cheque every player wants to come here. Or every team is just open trading certain guys / and that said guy is 100% on board as well. We have literally no idea who he talked to, what the costs were, what the convos were. I do know Fletch was probably the busiest guy based on overall activity, and likely was on the phone with more teams/players than most would normally in an off-season. Savard was cheap as you mentioned and signed with his childhood team. Logic would normally dictate that he got less money to do so (which likely would have lead to a larger contract/term) elsewhere. My assumption was that they wanted someone much tougher on that backend, and the options for that to play in the top4 were probably minimal at best.

I will concede that it's possible he spoke with the agents for guys like Larsson and Savard to gauge interest and then pivoted towards Risto after.

However, he did say he's had his eye on Risto for 2 years.

Also, as I mentioned, options better than Risto did/do exist via trade as well.
 
Risto was in demand, no one wanted Ghost for free.

Risto may have been in demand. But that still doesn’t change the fact that Chuck over payed for him. I don’t care if 6 other teams were willing to give up a first for him. Risto is still a bad player and not worth a first let alone adding assets to that first. Chuck just pissed away draft picks. Right out of the Paul Holmgren playbook
 
Larsson signed with Seattle before any other team could sign free agents.

Yeah I know that. However, there were reports that Fletcher was "keeping close tabs" on the Larsson situation in Edmonton. That leads me to believe they were interested in signing him but the feeling must not have been mutual since he signed with Seattle during their early negotiation period.
 
Risto may have been in demand. But that still doesn’t change the fact that Chuck over payed for him. I don’t care if 6 other teams were willing to give up a first for him. Risto is still a bad player and not worth a first let alone adding assets to that first. Chuck just pissed away draft picks. Right out of the Paul Holmgren playbook

The worst part for me about the Risto trade might be that he couldn't even get them to retain salary. It's only 1 year of retention and Buffalo still isn't even at the cap floor as of today! Asking Buffalo to retain would have been well within Fletcher's right considering the price to acquire him and it would have been extremely helpful to a Flyers team that will now be forced to carry a 22 man roster all season.
 
He's everything you claim Sanheim and Ghost are in that regard. Oh, and there's more to defense than hitting.
Never said or implied that hitting is all that matters defensively. In fact, when I say they needed an improvement in their physicality defending around the net, I'm not talking about hitting. I'm talking about winning positional battles and keeping guys from camping out at the crease.

Anyway, I'm giving Ristolainen a chance before declaring he's incapable of being an effective 2nd pairing RHD for the Flyers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: orangey
I will concede that it's possible he spoke with the agents for guys like Larsson and Savard to gauge interest and then pivoted towards Risto after.

However, he did say he's had his eye on Risto for 2 years.

Also, as I mentioned, options better than Risto did/do exist via trade as well.

The fact that he has watched Risto for multiple seasons, seen him suck, and went ahead with a massive overpayment to make it happen is not that surprising when you remember this koala-brained creature once traded Burns for Setoguchi.

What an eye for talent.
 
Never said or implied that hitting is all that matters defensively. In fact, when I say they needed an improvement in their physicality defending around the net, I'm not talking about hitting. I'm talking about winning positional battles and keeping guys from camping out at the crease.

Anyway, I'm giving Ristolainen a chance before declaring he's incapable of being an effective 2nd pairing RHD for the Flyers.

He couldn't be a 2nd pairing dman for a worse team, so the omens are bad. Pretty much universally bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ironmanrulez
I'm ok with making a trade and paying the price when you have a specific target. But this is Fletcher's team now. This was his make or break off-season. So we better have a good season.
I don’t know if this is Fletcher’s team or AV’s. Where I am with this is that I doubt that the Flyers will carry that many defensemen that have a $5M per yr contract. Maybe four? Ellis, Provorov, Ristolainen, Sanheim on an extension. Then there is York who will be quickly coming into that pay range. Someone is going to get moved out. I doubt that it will be York, a Fletcher draftee or Ristolainen who the GM paid a price in order to obtain. So Sanheim, who may be the better defenseman (I’m a fan) could be the odd man out. Under most circumstances I could live with that but I don’t trust Fletcher to not get bent over in a trade with Sanheim in it.
 
The worst part for me about the Risto trade might be that he couldn't even get them to retain salary. It's only 1 year of retention and Buffalo still isn't even at the cap floor as of today! Asking Buffalo to retain would have been well within Fletcher's right considering the price to acquire him and it would have been extremely helpful to a Flyers team that will now be forced to carry a 22 man roster all season.

They took Hagg, I would think people around here would perceive that as "taking salary." :naughty:
 
I don’t know if this is Fletcher’s team or AV’s. Where I am with this is that I doubt that the Flyers will carry that many defensemen that have a $5M per yr contract. Maybe four? Ellis, Provorov, Ristolainen, Sanheim on an extension. Then there is York who will be quickly coming into that pay range. Someone is going to get moved out. I doubt that it will be York, a Fletcher draftee or Ristolainen who the GM paid a price in order to obtain. So Sanheim, who may be the better defenseman (I’m a fan) could be the odd man out. Under most circumstances I could live with that but I don’t trust Fletcher to not get bent over in a trade with Sanheim in it.

York will probably get a 2 year bridge at a reasonable price. Same with Zamula.
So they won't have to deal with that issue until 2024-25.
 
They took Hagg, I would think people around here would perceive that as "taking salary." :naughty:
For a first and a second for a pending UFA it would have been prudent to have Buffalo retain salary. To me including Hagg should have just been swapping players so that the net change on contract spots for both teams remained at zero.
 
I don’t know if this is Fletcher’s team or AV’s. Where I am with this is that I doubt that the Flyers will carry that many defensemen that have a $5M per yr contract. Maybe four? Ellis, Provorov, Ristolainen, Sanheim on an extension. Then there is York who will be quickly coming into that pay range. Someone is going to get moved out. I doubt that it will be York, a Fletcher draftee or Ristolainen who the GM paid a price in order to obtain. So Sanheim, who may be the better defenseman (I’m a fan) could be the odd man out. Under most circumstances I could live with that but I don’t trust Fletcher to not get bent over in a trade with Sanheim in it.

It’s a good thing to have this problem. York has a few years before his salary increases. Injuries happen. If we have to trade Sanheim or someone else because they have been passed it’s a good thing
 
I don’t know if this is Fletcher’s team or AV’s. Where I am with this is that I doubt that the Flyers will carry that many defensemen that have a $5M per yr contract. Maybe four? Ellis, Provorov, Ristolainen, Sanheim on an extension. Then there is York who will be quickly coming into that pay range. Someone is going to get moved out. I doubt that it will be York, a Fletcher draftee or Ristolainen who the GM paid a price in order to obtain. So Sanheim, who may be the better defenseman (I’m a fan) could be the odd man out. Under most circumstances I could live with that but I don’t trust Fletcher to not get bent over in a trade with Sanheim in it.

Are we really talking about York making $5 million before his 3 year ELC even kicks in? Lets maybe relax.
 
That would involve this organization accurately deciding who passed who.

Given they moved the teams best defenseman last year as a cap dump, we can objectively say they aren't capable of accurately deciding who passed whom.
Management/coaching didn't like him calling them out and wanted him gone which is fine. The rush to dump him at any cost is completely unacceptable.

They should have held onto him until the dust started to settle on free agency because I'm sure there's a team out there who lost out on their target(s) that would have given up an asset for him.
 
That would involve this organization accurately deciding who passed who.

Given they moved the teams best defenseman last year as a cap dump, we can objectively say they aren't capable of accurately deciding who passed whom.
Oh Boy , Striker gave you some Kool Aid and you just chugged it down .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ernie96
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad