Roster thread: Get To Work (2022-2023 Season)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Irie

Registered User
Nov 14, 2010
4,683
4,634
Pacific Northwest
(Earlier) 2023 2nd + Comrie + Bryson + Ostlund/Savoie for Reimer and Ferraro

Ferraro is an interesting case.

He was great last season paired with Burns, but since Burns left, he's been a bit lost, and flat out not very good for the Sharks.

I don't know if he's available, but watching his play this season, I do not know if bringing him in would be much of an upgrade unless he could find some chemistry with another D here (which is a gamble).

It might be like watching "Chiarot with Weber" or "Bogosian with Hedman" - They look fantastic when complementing stars, but take them out of that environment and pair them with a lesser partner and can you expect the same level of play?
 

Ehran

Registered User
Sponsor
Feb 2, 2019
4,237
4,177
Texas
And right there lies the issue. We're not a top team. Not even close. We're trying to become a top team that does exactly what you describe.

Hence the growing pains.
I guess my counter argument is that GMs should look to insert veterans, either thru free agency or trades, to supplement rosters instead of rookies and 1st or 2nd year players.

Like I said earlier, I'm now leaning against the "develop in the NHL" model that the Sabres are employing. I honestly did support it at the beginning of the season but the players don't seem to be developing attributes (ie defensive responsibilities) that lead to winning consistently at the NHL level. We're 2/3 of the way thru the season and its the same problems.
 

HaNotsri

Regstred User
Dec 29, 2013
8,608
6,484
I guess my counter argument is that GMs should look to insert veterans, either thru free agency or trades, to supplement rosters instead of rookies and 1st or 2nd year players.

Like I said earlier, I'm now leaning against the "develop in the NHL" model that the Sabres are employing. I honestly did support it at the beginning of the season but the players don't seem to be developing attributes (ie defensive responsibilities) that lead to winning consistently at the NHL level. We're 2/3 of the way thru the season and its the same problems.
So far we've improved by 10% in points percentage. That's huge. If you look at the team on paper we should be near the bottom based on past merits.

I wanted a top 4 defenseman and a real goaltender because we would have had a legit chance when it comes to playoffs. That doesn't take have the achievement by coaches and players to be in it this far into the season.
 

Doug Prishpreed

Registered User
May 1, 2013
11,075
7,531
Brooklyn
Can't keep doing the same thing and patiently waiting for a different result.
You can't possibly look at our place in the standings this year and say they're doing the same thing as last year when they're projected to improve by 13 points or so.

And you can't possibly compare the roster this year vs last year and say they're doing the same thing as last year. Many players have noticeably different names on the back of their sweater.

Different team, different result.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zman5778

Zman5778

Moderator
Oct 4, 2005
26,737
25,416
Cressona/Reading, PA
Like I said earlier, I'm now leaning against the "develop in the NHL" model that the Sabres are employing. I honestly did support it at the beginning of the season but the players don't seem to be developing attributes (ie defensive responsibilities) that lead to winning consistently at the NHL level. We're 2/3 of the way thru the season and its the same problems.

Worked for Cozens. Worked for Dahlin. More or less worked for Tage.

We have more points this season than last so ostensibly we're a better team this season than last.....in a far tougher conference than it was last year.

The whole lassiez faire attitude towards defense from the forwards is concerning. But if you look at the guys that I've mentioned..........the vast majority of their growth as players came in the offseason; Cozens/Dahlin/Tage/etc all appeared like upgraded versions of themselves on Day 1 of a new season.

I more or less expect we'll see the same out of Power/Quinn/Peterka -- they'll make a jump from this season to next, even if they're inconsistent in this season.
 

Irie

Registered User
Nov 14, 2010
4,683
4,634
Pacific Northwest
Detroit got criticized on this board for bringing on a bunch of middle six vets with their cap space. (totally blocking thier prospects I am sure) Right now that veteran presence and play is helping carry them as the playoff intensity ramps up, while the Sabres left a ton of cap available and filled the roster with prospects barely out of puberty. To be a better team you need not only better players, but also the right mix of players. This team has skill, but no amount of patience will get them the size and grit they need.

KA and Granato have to realize that they are there now. Its time to start shaping this team into a more balanced group. Its also time to start installing a team system that includes team defense.
Detroit's players, on average, had probably two years more experience than the Sabres core. I think that put them in a different place and sped up their timeline in terms of Yzerman's pressure to make bigger moves.

Your comment about the team system is a great point and the biggest difference between the two teams, imo. Young guys coming into a very structured system will have a much easier time being in the right place and not hurting the team defensively.

Granato's system requires every player to read the specific play and make quick decisions on what to do defensively. His coaching style gives the young players a ton of leeway to be creative and develop their offensive games in the NHL which I believe is going to pay off longterm, but it will come at the cost of short-term success, as I don't think this coaching philosophy is going to work in today's dynamic NHL. The players need more structure to defend against the movement of this new league, and if every player's decisions are based on their own reads and not the system telling them where to be, defensive chemistry is going to be nearly impossible to achieve against better teams that move and execute well.
 

Zman5778

Moderator
Oct 4, 2005
26,737
25,416
Cressona/Reading, PA
Granato's system requires every player to read the specific play and make quick decisions on what to do defensively. His coaching style gives the young players a ton of leeway to be creative and develop their offensive games in the NHL which I believe is going to pay off longterm, but it will come at the cost of short-term success, as I don't think this coaching philosophy is going to work in today's dynamic NHL. The players need more structure to defend against the movement of this new league, and if every player's decisions are based on their own reads and not the system telling them where to be, defensive chemistry is going to be nearly impossible to achieve against better teams that move and execute well.

I do wonder if what we're seeing this season is part of a long-term plan on Granato's side. He's mentioned a few times that he thinks it's far easier to let the kids figure out the offensive game on their own and then teach defensive structure. I wonder if the plan all along was to let the kids go this season, take the ups with the downs......and then use the offseason and into next season to teach the defensive structure they lack.

I know even the mere thought or idea that this year was more about development than winning might wrankle many........but KA and DG have preached long-term success.

I wonder if this defensive system/improvements we're all desperate for is coming in the off-season.....hmmm.......
 

Irie

Registered User
Nov 14, 2010
4,683
4,634
Pacific Northwest
I do wonder if what we're seeing this season is part of a long-term plan on Granato's side. He's mentioned a few times that he thinks it's far easier to let the kids figure out the offensive game on their own and then teach defensive structure. I wonder if the plan all along was to let the kids go this season, take the ups with the downs......and then use the offseason and into next season to teach the defensive structure they lack.

I know even the mere thought or idea that this year was more about development than winning might wrankle many........but KA and DG have preached long-term success.

I wonder if this defensive system/improvements we're all desperate for is coming in the off-season.....hmmm.......

I've heard those talking points too, that they just haven't had time to install the defensive structure yet. I don't buy that. A good coach should be able to have new system in place and work out the major kinks in 2-3 weeks. (player chemsitry can take much longer within the system, but the basic system does not take years to implement, unless you are trying to invent it as you go, which may be the case here.

I think Granato believes in a flow on the ice, where everyone is somewhat interchangeable defensively. We have heard it from a few players where they comment on the difference between playing center or wing, and that the transition is seamless because their job is not dictated by what position they are listed at, but where they are on the ice at any given moment. That requires a lot of mental processing by the players, and is especially hard on the young guys.

Razor has mentioned two or three times in the last few games that "Donny wants the extra aggressive mindset of challenging the puck-carriers before they have time to make plays" as the key to what the team is working on in practice. This philosophy shows on the ice. The team is extra aggressive and out of position more often than not. I believe it is a coaching philosophy that will no longer work in the NHL. It is good for the college game and juniors, where the reaction time of offensive players is 40% slower, but if you try that in today's NHL, talented teams that execute well will eat you alive.

The PK seems to be based on this philosophy as well, and I do not believe you can have a PK that works at even 75% in todays game if this is your gameplan, and if you are much below 80% on the PK, you aren't going to have any success in the playoffs and you are no where near contender status, imo.
 

Djp

Registered User
Jul 28, 2012
24,644
6,013
Alexandria, VA
Detroit got criticized on this board for bringing on a bunch of middle six vets with their cap space. (totally blocking thier prospects I am sure) Right now that veteran presence and play is helping carry them as the playoff intensity ramps up, while the Sabres left a ton of cap available and filled the roster with prospects barely out of puberty. To be a better team you need not only better players, but also the right mix of players. This team has skill, but no amount of patience will get them the size and grit they need.

KA and Granato have to realize that they are there now. Its time to start shaping this team into a more balanced group. Its also time to start installing a team system that includes team defense.

thr issue in Detroit is that they wanted to try and be competitive again when they didn’t finish the rebuilding process.

early on in their rebuild they had some poor drafts which is hurting thrm now.

more than half their team are going to be UFAs between summer 2023-2025.

based on buffalo roster they will have how many? Girgs, KO, the 2 they signed in the off season, Olofsson. A few of their RFAs coukd be UFAs in 2025

detroit didn’t draft high rnough to get a big piece but these signing will likely keep them in thst bubble zone where they draft 10-18 the next few years instead 3-10. Now they could see bettuzzi and larkin walk
We are very overstocked with smallish forward prospects that are unlikely to do anything about what we are missing in our middle six. Detroit recognized you need a more balanced team and went out and got what it needed. We doubled down on small ball.

They are two different philosophies, and I am not happy with ours. We are going to have to build a better middle six and at is going to take trades or UFA's to do it because the prospects coming are the wrong type. Thats just how I see it. You want to get caved even more? Be patient and add, Rosen, Savoie, and Ostlund to our middle six.

we finished strong last year and felt they turned a corner and wanted to see how this team goes.

the problrm is buffalo has a bunch of younger players still on ELCs this year who are still learning. You want to get fill in vets and block their development. No matter when players will have an adjustment period

buffalo also has to be careful of cap space.
Something I dug up while researching this morning-

The top 10 teams by points in the NHL ice a total of 7 players that are 22 or younger - Leafs ice 0, Boston 0, Devils 1, TBL 0, VGK 0, Stars 1, Jets 0, Kings 1, Hurricanes 2, Rangers 2.

The Sabres alone ice 7. (Power, Quinn, Peterka, Cozens, Samuelsson, Krebs, Dahlin).

That's a lot of growing pains that we're enduring this year.

yep…they have a young team. They would be much younger without Anderson and KO. They are learning.
Top teams have decent flows of prospects flowing into their system and don't need to have "growing pains" in the National League. Or they have GMs that evaluate NHL level skills and continually bring in players as needs arise.

I'm starting to sour on the idea of developing players at the NHL level, TBH. Or at least 1/3 of the roster at the same time. But.... to be fair this is as much of a problem caused by previous GMs as it is the current one. There hasn't been an influx of NHL level developed players coming out of Rochester in way too many years. Not sure what the answer is.

This team does need to develop its defensive game at some point, however. We're still seeing the same issues as we did last year and all this season. When does the team learn to defend? Because if we need to take another year for the team to learn to do that, it's another year outside the playoffs.

EDIT: If the answer is that the coaches say "it's okay if you make mistakes defending as long you are trying" that is fine. But there has to be some consequences for the continual mistakes and lack of effort, at some point.

top teams have even flow…not really. They trade off their high picks thrn hope something late 2nd or worse becomes nhl worthy. The top teams now all were bottom teams in the past.

this is what happens when they go through change by trading Eichel, Reinhart, and risto. Thry also drsfted high picks. You want to give them time to development.

the team will have an influx the next few years. Thsts what happens with a bunch of top 45 picks.

buffalo is likely that way come 25/26 season thry will have a young team under longer contracts

We haven't been a top team in a dozens years. You won't get there on just drafting prospects and waiting. This waiting until we get better, before making moves to get better, is exactly why we do not get better. If your going to be a good team, start acting like a good team, which also means not fast tracking prospects! Also, not being afraid to trade picks or prospects to get better.

The NHL in not a development league. It is a league for NHL players, and NHL ready prospects. The Sabres continuously bring up prospects before they are really ready because they have needs and/or hopes to fill.

I do not want to see ANY of Rosen, Kulich, Savoie, Ostlund in the NHL next year. Move on from Aspland, Olofsson, Mitts, Okposo, Bryson, etc. Trade or sign better players to fill the holes in the roster, and don't worry about blocking prospects. Worry about supporting the current NHL ready core players you have. Then when prospects get good enough to force your hand, then there are lots of ways to make a spot for them if you need them, or trade for something you do need.

Can't keep doing the same thing and patiently waiting for a different result.

go back and see what other “ top”teams did in their last 10-15 years.
I guess my counter argument is that GMs should look to insert veterans, either thru free agency or trades, to supplement rosters instead of rookies and 1st or 2nd year players.

Like I said earlier, I'm now leaning against the "develop in the NHL" model that the Sabres are employing. I honestly did support it at the beginning of the season but the players don't seem to be developing attributes (ie defensive responsibilities) that lead to winning consistently at the NHL level. We're 2/3 of the way thru the season and its the same problems.

from buffalo fre sgrnts want more money/ more term thst buffalo won’t offer to block very good prospects. I expect come 24/25 Peterka and Quinn are better than most who were available as UFAs
 

MarkusKetterer

Shoulda got one game in
Ferraro is an interesting case.

He was great last season paired with Burns, but since Burns left, he's been a bit lost, and flat out not very good for the Sharks.

I don't know if he's available, but watching his play this season, I do not know if bringing him in would be much of an upgrade unless he could find some chemistry with another D here (which is a gamble).

It might be like watching "Chiarot with Weber" or "Bogosian with Hedman" - They look fantastic when complementing stars, but take them out of that environment and pair them with a lesser partner and can you expect the same level of play?

My thinking is we get a partner for Power or Joker, and upgrade the D corps.

With my proposals, that people are pushing back on, the team is:

Skinner - Tage - Tuch
Crouse - Cozens - Quinn
Mitts - Jost - Olofsson
Girgensons- Krebs - Okposo
Asplund

Sammy - Dahlin
Power - Peeke/Ferraro
Peeke/Ferraro - Joker
Lyubushkin

Reimer
6K
Anderson

Obviously some of the bottom 6 becomes unknown in the future, but those should be easier to get in the off-season
 

Zman5778

Moderator
Oct 4, 2005
26,737
25,416
Cressona/Reading, PA
I've heard those talking points too, that they just haven't had time to install the defensive structure yet. I don't buy that. A good coach should be able to have new system in place and work out the major kinks in 2-3 weeks. (player chemsitry can take much longer within the system, but the basic system does not take years to implement, unless you are trying to invent it as you go, which may be the case here.

I think Granato believes in a flow on the ice, where everyone is somewhat interchangeable defensively. We have heard it from a few players where they comment on the difference between playing center or wing, and that the transition is seamless because their job is not dictated by what position they are listed at, but where they are on the ice at any given moment. That requires a lot of mental processing by the players, and is especially hard on the young guys.

Razor has mentioned two or three times in the last few games that "Donny wants the extra aggressive mindset of challenging the puck-carriers before they have time to make plays" as the key to what the team is working on in practice. This philosophy shows on the ice. The team is extra aggressive and out of position more often than not. I believe it is a coaching philosophy that will no longer work in the NHL. It is good for the college game and juniors, where the reaction time of offensive players is 40% slower, but if you try that in today's NHL, talented teams that execute well will eat you alive.

The PK seems to be based on this philosophy as well, and I do not believe you can have a PK that works at even 75% in todays game if this is your gameplan, and if you are much below 80% on the PK, you aren't going to have any success in the playoffs and you are no where near contender status, imo.

I agree with the bulk of your post but just wanted to clarify something as regards the bolded:

I don't think that DG hasn't had the time. I think it's a deliberate, intentional thing -- focus on the offensive side of the game this year, expose them to what happens if you continue to focus on nothing but offense.....and then bring in a defensive system in the offseason once the players "get it".

Now, I do agree that if this is intentional -- it's kind of baffling. Now is the time to be like "You've seen what happens if you ignore defense -- now let's learn to play D and win even more". Now is the time to rein the kids in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sabreality

Sabreality

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 12, 2008
10,871
4,639
Atlanta, GA
I do wonder if what we're seeing this season is part of a long-term plan on Granato's side. He's mentioned a few times that he thinks it's far easier to let the kids figure out the offensive game on their own and then teach defensive structure. I wonder if the plan all along was to let the kids go this season, take the ups with the downs......and then use the offseason and into next season to teach the defensive structure they lack.

I know even the mere thought or idea that this year was more about development than winning might wrankle many........but KA and DG have preached long-term success.

I wonder if this defensive system/improvements we're all desperate for is coming in the off-season.....hmmm.......
I dont think you have to wonder, he's always stated he wants them to play 'fast and free', Its obvious he doesnt want to put too much on their plate and them to overthink. I've jokingly said before equating it to school that they havent reached that part of the curriculum yet, it'll come. You can't fast forward physical maturity no matter how much fans want it, it takes more than just effort and X's & O's to play a defensive game, these guys need to play to their strengths now until they get stronger.

See how Krueger mismanaged Dahlin, attempting to get him to play like a 25yr old Dman, he wasnt ready and shouldve been allowed to GO...we have more of those kids now, and they arent ready for that D game...time takes time so its pond hockey for now :laugh:
 

Irie

Registered User
Nov 14, 2010
4,683
4,634
Pacific Northwest
My thinking is we get a partner for Power or Joker, and upgrade the D corps.

With my proposals, that people are pushing back on, the team is:

Skinner - Tage - Tuch
Crouse - Cozens - Quinn
Mitts - Jost - Olofsson
Girgensons- Krebs - Okposo
Asplund

Sammy - Dahlin
Power - Peeke/Ferraro
Peeke/Ferraro - Joker
Lyubushkin

Reimer
6K
Anderson

Obviously some of the bottom 6 becomes unknown in the future, but those should be easier to get in the off-season
Would love to add Crouse, but I don't think he's available (I know RT said he would think long and hard about trading him for Peterka and a pick, but Armstrong and most other Yotes fans I think may feel differently).

Also, would a late 2nd and a B prospect be enough for Peeke? Didn't columbus just lock him in longterm?

The problem with trading for players that aren't for sale is that the costs are always going to be more than the value of the player to get teams to bite. I think fans see prospects like Jiricek and Mateychuk and want to move out guys to make room, but management often wants to keep their prospects down "marinating" longer than we fans, and the perception that guys should be available might not be the case.

Savoie+ the early 2nd in this draft for Reimer and Ferraro is not very good value, imo, but I like them as adds (just not at that price)
 

Irie

Registered User
Nov 14, 2010
4,683
4,634
Pacific Northwest
I agree with the bulk of your post but just wanted to clarify something as regards the bolded:

I don't think that DG hasn't had the time. I think it's a deliberate, intentional thing -- focus on the offensive side of the game this year, expose them to what happens if you continue to focus on nothing but offense.....and then bring in a defensive system in the offseason once the players "get it".

Now, I do agree that if this is intentional -- it's kind of baffling. Now is the time to be like "You've seen what happens if you ignore defense -- now let's learn to play D and win even more". Now is the time to rein the kids in.

I have thought of this too, and I hope you are right, but the over-aggressive high-pressure strategy is very common at the Collegiate and lower levels of coaching, and while the work-ethic aspect of it is good, it develops bad habits. imo. If there is a disciplined structured defensive system in the pipeline, installing the basics of just team defense positioning, gap control, and D-zone spacing should be part of the rebuild philosophy.

Sound spacing and gapping are not locking the young guys into a rigid forecheck and nuetral zone structure that is going to neuter their offensive development the way a Trotz or Tortorella coaching plan does.

I don't see a downside and a reason not to, unless that is not part of the system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zman5778

Ehran

Registered User
Sponsor
Feb 2, 2019
4,237
4,177
Texas
Worked for Cozens. Worked for Dahlin. More or less worked for Tage.

We have more points this season than last so ostensibly we're a better team this season than last.....in a far tougher conference than it was last year.

The whole lassiez faire attitude towards defense from the forwards is concerning. But if you look at the guys that I've mentioned..........the vast majority of their growth as players came in the offseason; Cozens/Dahlin/Tage/etc all appeared like upgraded versions of themselves on Day 1 of a new season.

I more or less expect we'll see the same out of Power/Quinn/Peterka -- they'll make a jump from this season to next, even if they're inconsistent in this season.
I'm not saying it can't work, just that I'm not convinced that it's a good idea to do it with 1/3 of the team at once.

Dahlin is in his 5th year. Thompson was in his 5th year before he started to score. Cozens is in his 3rd year.

If the plan is for Power/Quinn/Peterka to have major jumps next season and the rest of the team to suddenly care about defense, that's not a plan, that's a hope.
 

SundherDome

Y'all have to much power
Jul 6, 2009
15,289
7,186
Minneapolis,MN
I like this discussion on prospects. I'm in the slow cook method. IMO guys should put in a year in the minors **unless they are generational**. That first year should be broken out into trimesters. First trimester, go play. Let's see what these guys/gals have and watch their habits and how they adjust to a new rink/faster more physical players.
2nd trimester, work on what their good at. Put them in situations to use their drafted skills.
3rd trimester, work on their weaknesses. What is something they really struggle with? Put them in those situations and see how they react.

From there you then give them an off-season plan that caters to what they need to work on.

Training camp next year you see what they have. See if they earned a spot or if they need a little more time or a lot more time.
 

MarkusKetterer

Shoulda got one game in
Would love to add Crouse, but I don't think he's available (I know RT said he would think long and hard about trading him for Peterka and a pick, but Armstrong and most other Yotes fans I think may feel differently).

Also, would a late 2nd and a B prospect be enough for Peeke? Didn't columbus just lock him in longterm?

The problem with trading for players that aren't for sale is that the costs are always going to be more than the value of the player to get teams to bite. I think fans see prospects like Jiricek and Mateychuk and want to move out guys to make room, but management often wants to keep their prospects down "marinating" longer than we fans, and the perception that guys should be available might not be the case.

Savoie+ the early 2nd in this draft for Reimer and Ferraro is not very good value, imo, but I like them as adds (just not at that price)

He’s not available, but it might make Armstrong think and mull it over. It is two first rounder equivalents after all. Plus it gives the Yotes someone to plug into the lineup right away. It’s not like it’s Poltapov and a pick.

And I said Savoie or Ostlund (preferably Ostlund). Bryson + Comrie is just contract swapping, so I figure they add no value. So it breaks down to Ostlund for Ferraro, and then the second for Reimer which is probably his value. It’s an overpayment, but nothing too crazy of one.

As for Peeke, as far as I know he’s a RFA this off-season. He’s having a down year, which Columbus fans have acknowledged and said he’s probably worth less than he would have been if the team didn’t get decimated by injuries and become dogshit.

Regardless, all of these players, besides Reimer, are in their mid 20s and can grow with the core.
 

Bendium

Registered User
Oct 18, 2019
1,907
1,489
You can't possibly look at our place in the standings this year and say they're doing the same thing as last year when they're projected to improve by 13 points or so.

And you can't possibly compare the roster this year vs last year and say they're doing the same thing as last year. Many players have noticeably different names on the back of their sweater.

Different team, different result.
Yeah, go back and read the post I was responding to. You kind of pulled that statement out of my post, out of context. What your responding with is not at all what I was talking about and responding too. So not sure how to answer you.

I agree its a different team that is doing better than expected and better than last year. That doesn't mean we should once again do nothing to improve the team....because we just aren't good enough yet.
 

Bendium

Registered User
Oct 18, 2019
1,907
1,489
I'm not saying it can't work, just that I'm not convinced that it's a good idea to do it with 1/3 of the team at once.

Dahlin is in his 5th year. Thompson was in his 5th year before he started to score. Cozens is in his 3rd year.

If the plan is for Power/Quinn/Peterka to have major jumps next season and the rest of the team to suddenly care about defense, that's not a plan, that's a hope.
Don't forget we have Rosen, Kulich, Ostlund, and Savoie coming that we have to wait to develop, and the 4 pickes we will make this year in the first 2 rounds.....oh, and then there is next years picks......got to wait on them to develop tooo.

Be patient, we will get there. :sarcasm:
 

The Blunder Years

Registered User
Nov 11, 2013
2,585
2,248
716
My dream right now is somehow grabbing Barbashev with an extension and pulling off the Chychrun trade for the reported asking price.

Mitts, 2nd for Barbashev
Lottery protected 1st and Rosen for Chychrun.

Bottom 6 this year and next (rotate in Rousek/Kulich)

Barbashev-Krebs-Olofsson
Girgs-Jost-Okposo

D core:

Samuelsson-Dahlin
Power-Chychrun
Johnson/FA-Joker
Boosh
 

Irie

Registered User
Nov 14, 2010
4,683
4,634
Pacific Northwest
He’s not available, but it might make Armstrong think and mull it over. It is two first rounder equivalents after all. Plus it gives the Yotes someone to plug into the lineup right away. It’s not like it’s Poltapov and a pick.

And I said Savoie or Ostlund (preferably Ostlund). Bryson + Comrie is just contract swapping, so I figure they add no value. So it breaks down to Ostlund for Ferraro, and then the second for Reimer which is probably his value. It’s an overpayment, but nothing too crazy of one.

As for Peeke, as far as I know he’s a RFA this off-season. He’s having a down year, which Columbus fans have acknowledged and said he’s probably worth less than he would have been if the team didn’t get decimated by injuries and become dogshit.

Regardless, all of these players, besides Reimer, are in their mid 20s and can grow with the core.

While I think the age is important, having team control for multiple years and not having contracts that take players into the 32+ gamble years is my main focus. If a guy is 26 or 27 and under contract until they are 30 or 31, I feel they have a lot more value to this team than a guy who is 24 and UFA in a season or two. Target age" is not as big of a thing to me, but I like your position of bringing in guys you know are going to be around for multiple seasons, and could get on board with some of those deals.

Given where we are in the team rebuild timeline, moving a lot of assets for a better players now is not as huge of a priority to me. I feel like it is an alternative build philosophy that has some merrit as well, but for me, this team is going to be competitive when Power, Cozens, Quinn, Samuelsson and Peterka are dominant, and can compliment Dahlin, Thompson and Tuch. Not when they are all still passengers, so I am ok waiting another year before being extra aggressive and ramping up the finishing touches on the rebuild.

*Edit* - also on Peeke, he signed a 3 year extension earlier this year that kicks in next season
 

MarkusKetterer

Shoulda got one game in
While I think the age is important, having team control for multiple years and not having contracts that take players into the 32+ gamble years is my main focus. If a guy is 26 or 27 and under contract until they are 30 or 31, I feel they have a lot more value to this team than a guy who is 24 and UFA in a season or two. Target age" is not as big of a thing to me, but I like your position of bringing in guys you know are going to be around for multiple seasons, and could get on board with some of those deals.

Given where we are in the team rebuild timeline, moving a lot of assets for a better players now is not as huge of a priority to me. I feel like it is an alternative build philosophy that has some merrit as well, but for me, this team is going to be competitive when Power, Cozens, Quinn, Samuelsson and Peterka are dominant, and can compliment Dahlin, Thompson and Tuch. Not when they are all still passengers, so I am ok waiting another year before being extra aggressive and ramping up the finishing touches on the rebuild.

You deal with it. If you have an extended core, then it’s better. The only not long term piece in those trades is Reimer, but that’s due to age. And he’d be a good coach for 6K and/or Levi.

It’s also why I wanted the slow as f*** Chara last year. Imagine him teaching Dahlin, Sammy, Joker and Power. Hell, even Bryson and Fitzy. They’re gonna listen more to a HOFer than Marty Wilford, who couldn’t even crack a shitty Preds team
 

Mattilaus

Registered User
Sep 12, 2014
7,762
6,443
Beyond the Wall
Am I the only one not convinced Barbashev is that good? His defensive stats are not good and he has a career high of 60 points in 81 games last year as a 26 year old. Before that his career high was 26 points. He is on pace for like 40 points this year. What am I missing on this guy?

1677115655004.png
 

Irie

Registered User
Nov 14, 2010
4,683
4,634
Pacific Northwest
Am I the only one not convinced Barbashev is that good? His defensive stats are not good and he has a career high of 60 points in 81 games last year as a 26 year old. Before that his career high was 26 points. He is on pace for like 40 points this year. What am I missing on this guy?

View attachment 654970

I agree, I think his style of play was a perfect fit to go with Buchnevich and Tarasenko, and the results was much greater than the sum of their parts.

Right now there is a big "grass is always greener" mentality around the league. People want change just for change's sake.

There are so many people trying to earn a living by throwing takes around on the Internet, that we have "pundits" pushing narratives and parroting each other, and it often leads to some idle speculation becoming a gospel that too many take for fact, despite evidence to the contrary.
 

The Blunder Years

Registered User
Nov 11, 2013
2,585
2,248
716
Am I the only one not convinced Barbashev is that good? His defensive stats are not good and he has a career high of 60 points in 81 games last year as a 26 year old. Before that his career high was 26 points. He is on pace for like 40 points this year. What am I missing on this guy?

View attachment 654970
Not sure who he has been playing with this year and how much the Blues poor play has impact his metrics. However, I think he’s the spark plug energy player that our team is really missing. You could argue Jost is but he doesn’t have the physical game that Barbashev has.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad