I wonder if something around Joker for Fabbri could be an interesting chance of scenery trade for both teams
Maybe.....I wonder if something around Joker for Fabbri could be an interesting chance of scenery trade for both teams
I'm really starting to think that Mitts is going to anchor our 3rd line long-term and won't look out of place when he has to move into the top 6 due to injuries. The switch may have finally been flipped.
I'm really starting to think that Mitts is going to anchor our 3rd line long-term and won't look out of place when he has to move into the top 6 due to injuries. The switch may have finally been flipped.
He is pretty damn tenacious along the wall though, and in puck battles in general.he looks so bad defensively. Makes so many odd turnovers. I get not every player on the team can be great. I'm just not seeing it with him. I'd prefer a player with size who does other things needed included defense.
I think he's one of our better forwards when it comes to getting into passing lanes and winning board battles. He could end up scoring 50+ points in a very limited role so I'm impressed either way.he looks so bad defensively. Makes so many odd turnovers. I get not every player on the team can be great. I'm just not seeing it with him. I'd prefer a player with size who does other things needed included defense.
That is what I would do. Getting Fabri is a lateral move. Nashville probably wants picks or cheaper labor because they are going to be cap strapped.Maybe.....
But I do wonder if maybe Joker is someone we package with a pick and/or a prospect for a better RHD to partner with Power long-term.
he looks so bad defensively. Makes so many odd turnovers. I get not every player on the team can be great. I'm just not seeing it with him. I'd prefer a player with size who does other things needed included defense.
Weirdly, my favorite play of his last night was when Clague made the soft pinch on the left wing boards that put four Sabres deep in the Duck's zone and Mitts looked up, saw this, and busted ass to get back to intercept the pass to Comrie's right on the odd-man rush deep in the Sabres zone. He can make those plays and he's gotten a lot better at puck security around both bluelines (same thing that Krebs has had to learn this year). He's been a lot better over the last 6 weeks than the first 6 weeks of the season. His wall work is some of the best on the team and he's been really good at establishing forecheck.
That is what I would do. Getting Fabri is a lateral move. Nashville probably wants picks or cheaper labor because they are going to be cap strapped.
That is what I would do. Getting Fabri is a lateral move. Nashville probably wants picks or cheaper labor because they are going to be cap strapped.
FA rto isI'm not even sure swapping Joker for Fabbri is a lateral move for us........I think the best case with such a swap is that it turns out to be a lateral move. I certainly don't think that swap makes us a better team, at first.
Savoie likely will not be ready next season and back in the CHLNo interest in that move. None. It’s a clear and significant downgrade.
Roy would have been on the 04/05 team the full season. Poms and Vanek likely get called up. Gaustead on the team too. They played in Rochester.
Quinn and Peterka did not get fast tracked. Most rookies don’t strp in and put up 50+ pts. Keeping thrm in the A WOULD NOT have mattered. Thry woukd still have to go through the adjustment.
usually you don’t see 21 draft start their ELC till 23/24 season. 22 draft till the season later.
i see Rosen getting called up during 23/24 season. Kulich might as well. Savoie coukd be 4C on next years team because of CHL exclusivity rules.
next year you coukd have
Skinner-tage-tuck
xxx-Cozens-xxx
Girgrnsons-Krebs- xxx
quinn-Savoie-Peterka
xxx are Mitts, Olofsson, and Okposo resigned.
its not a banner year, its called progressionView attachment 650292
View attachment 650293
It isn't though? It's actually reasonably close with the edge slightly in Greenway's favor. And keep in mind, this is a down year for Greenway and a banner year for Mittelstadt.
When looking to build our defense long term, I think we need to realize a couple things…
1. Dahlin is not only adept at playing on his off-hand, but I believe it’s better for him. He should generally be considered a “RHD” when putting together a roster.
2. Power is also strongly capable of playing his off hand.
3. Samuelsson will be tied to one of the two throughout his tenure here
4. Samuelsson plays s physical style that we need to have depth behind with someone who plays a similar game.
Taking these things into consideration I believe short term we need a LHD to improve the Bryson spot, but long term are likely looking to improve on Jokhiharju. Regardless, the team should simply find the best defenseman it can, and that player should be able to pair into the top-4 regardless. The main thing is that I believe the player they add to the defense should,
1) be a similar styled player to Samuelsson
2) be a veteran (mid 20’s to early 30’s) with 2-3yrs left on their deal.
Rumors floating that Calgary may be shopping Weegar. Shame he signed an 8 year deal, Weegar for 4 years would have been interesting if he was available.Dingggggg donngggg
Do you have a moment to talk about our lord and savior, Mattias Ekholm?
Rumors floating that Calgary may be shopping Weegar. Shame he signed an 8 year deal, Weegar for 4 years would have been interesting if he was available.
Duffer throws the idea of Chychrun into the mix and Shayne gets giddy around 8 minutes in.
Rumors floating that Calgary may be shopping Weegar. Shame he signed an 8 year deal, Weegar for 4 years would have been interesting if he was available.
He’s beat his previous career high of points by 30% and there is 20 games left in the season.its not a banner year, its called progression